WT- Nate unlikely to be back (WAIT! + instagram pic pg 81!)
Moderators: HomoSapien, kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
- Quinarvy
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,444
- And1: 134
- Joined: Oct 16, 2010
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
Why are the Bulls so against using the D-League?
D-ROSE. BIGGER. STRONGER. FASTER THAN YOU CHRIS PAUL.
- Stacey King
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,573
- And1: 2,463
- Joined: Jun 05, 2013
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
Quinarvy wrote:Why are the Bulls so against using the D-League?
I don't understand that either. Same with summer league, we have a bunch of nobodies. We didn't even go ask undrafted rookies who had decent college careers.
DENG HE SUCKS!!!!
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,151
- And1: 1,949
- Joined: Jul 05, 2013
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
not sure about the dleague but I think the bulls didnt go after may top name undrafted rookies because they want to give the bulk of the minutes to teague, snell, malcolm thomas, and erick murphy. They are proabaly going to look at goudelock and routins to see if they can bring anything valuable to the team. but all of the top undrafted players proably chose summerleague rosters that they know that they have a chance of making the team. And they proably also chose a summerleague roster that they know they get more playing time on. The bulls are proably are only going to sign 1 or two more players.It seems more likely that they are going to be vets. I do hope they give goudelock a look if they cant resign nate though.
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
- HomoSapien
- Senior Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 37,246
- And1: 30,215
- Joined: Aug 17, 2009
-
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
Chitownbulls wrote:Quinarvy wrote:Why are the Bulls so against using the D-League?
I don't understand that either. Same with summer league, we have a bunch of nobodies. We didn't even go ask undrafted rookies who had decent college careers.
They are against it because of what happened to their young big man, Martynas Andriuskevicius.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
- kyrv
- RealGM
- Posts: 60,434
- And1: 3,788
- Joined: Jan 02, 2003
- Location: Intimidated by TNT
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
HomoSapien wrote:Chitownbulls wrote:Quinarvy wrote:Why are the Bulls so against using the D-League?
I don't understand that either. Same with summer league, we have a bunch of nobodies. We didn't even go ask undrafted rookies who had decent college careers.
They are against it because of what happened to their young big man, Martynas Andriuskevicius.
He was in the Hughes/Gooden for Wallace trade right? I remember him, I remember him going to the D-League, but I don't remember what happened?
Bill Walton wrote: Keep the music playing.
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,511
- And1: 1,745
- Joined: Apr 16, 2012
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
kyrv wrote:HomoSapien wrote:Chitownbulls wrote:
I don't understand that either. Same with summer league, we have a bunch of nobodies. We didn't even go ask undrafted rookies who had decent college careers.
They are against it because of what happened to their young big man, Martynas Andriuskevicius.
He was in the Hughes/Gooden for Wallace trade right? I remember him, I remember him going to the D-League, but I don't remember what happened?
Way before that 2005 44th pick was traded to the bulls in 06 and in the 06 summer league suffered a fractured skull courtesy of a punch from Awvee Storey.
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
- RedBulls23
- Forum Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 38,338
- And1: 21,318
- Joined: Jan 19, 2009
- Location: Waiting in Grant Park
-
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
kyrv wrote:
He was in the Hughes/Gooden for Wallace trade right? I remember him, I remember him going to the D-League, but I don't remember what happened?
He got sucker punched by a teammate during practice. I think Martynas was practicing hard and the guy didn't like it or something and hit him so hard that I think Martynas ended up being in the hospital. It was a real dirty hit if I remember correctly.
Edit: Found an article.
”He has a skull fracture, severe concussion and a two-centimeter hematoma on the left side of his brain,” Andriuskevicius’ agent Herb Rudoy said. ”They’ve been monitoring him because they’re concerned about seizures.
”From what I’m told, when he got hit unexpectedly, he went out cold instantly and fell right back on his head.”
Read more: http://www.everyjoe.com/2006/12/23/spor ... z2YsNSNPTQ
My Tweets:@Salim_BGhoops
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
- Flopper
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,541
- And1: 2,505
- Joined: Jun 05, 2010
-
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
HomoSapien wrote:Chitownbulls wrote:Quinarvy wrote:Why are the Bulls so against using the D-League?
I don't understand that either. Same with summer league, we have a bunch of nobodies. We didn't even go ask undrafted rookies who had decent college careers.
They are against it because of what happened to their young big man, Martynas Andriuskevicius.
Guess they didn't have to worry about that with James Johnson.

Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,042
- And1: 5,965
- Joined: Jul 04, 2004
- Location: Palm Bay, FL
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
Brett Poirier NBA @BrettNBA 2h
Source: Raptors interested in signing free agent Nate Robinson, would use him as backup point guard behind Kyle Lowry
Kevin Bryant @KevinRashidi 2h
Talks about getting Nate Robinson or Rodrigue Beaubois are back on as Raptors will NOT be signing Julyan Stone due to a failed physical.#R
So Nate could be Toronto bound now. This would be the 2nd year Toronto took our 3rd string PG.
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,280
- And1: 9,916
- Joined: Dec 04, 2001
-
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
I thought JamesOn Curry punched Martynas, not Storey?
https://august-shop.com/ - sneakers and streetwear
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
- JackFinn
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,121
- And1: 1,605
- Joined: Oct 08, 2006
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
Kevin Bryant @KevinRashidi 2h
Talks about getting Nate Robinson or Rodrigue Beaubois are back on as Raptors will NOT be signing Julyan Stone due to a failed physical.#R
They better get Beaubois. If they don't, they're clearly racists.
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,936
- And1: 2,699
- Joined: Jul 16, 2010
-
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
Ralphb07 wrote:Brett Poirier NBA @BrettNBA 2h
Source: Raptors interested in signing free agent Nate Robinson, would use him as backup point guard behind Kyle LowryKevin Bryant @KevinRashidi 2h
Talks about getting Nate Robinson or Rodrigue Beaubois are back on as Raptors will NOT be signing Julyan Stone due to a failed physical.#R
So Nate could be Toronto bound now. This would be the 2nd year Toronto took our 3rd string PG.
This was after the Dwight Buycks signing? In the WT is said:
The Oklahoman first reported that Buycks had agreed to be the Raptors’ backup point guard.
I realize it would make since to have a veteran PG as back-up as Buycks is unproven at the NBA level, but was just curious if these tweets were taking that signing into consideration
Doctor Drain wrote:Can a butterfly sing?
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
- RedBulls23
- Forum Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 38,338
- And1: 21,318
- Joined: Jan 19, 2009
- Location: Waiting in Grant Park
-
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
Gar Paxdorf wrote:I thought JamesOn Curry punched Martynas, not Storey?
No JamesOn had different issues in the d leauge. He was arrested for public urination. Those two reasons I think why the fo doesn't like letting our rookies go down there. They probably feel it's not the best atmosphere and they could just teach them more by themselves.
My Tweets:@Salim_BGhoops
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,042
- And1: 5,965
- Joined: Jul 04, 2004
- Location: Palm Bay, FL
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
Buycks failed his physical
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
- RedBulls23
- Forum Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 38,338
- And1: 21,318
- Joined: Jan 19, 2009
- Location: Waiting in Grant Park
-
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
Do the raptors have the full mle still? Chances are they will offer him half of that 

My Tweets:@Salim_BGhoops
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,363
- And1: 224
- Joined: Jul 07, 2013
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
Ralphb07 wrote:Buycks failed his physical
If that is true, the Raptors must be jinxed, since Julyan Stone failed his. Maybe that is enough reason for Nate to stay away? I see Dallas as a better fit anyway.
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,387
- And1: 310
- Joined: Mar 22, 2013
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
we are the best fit for nate
come now
come now
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,936
- And1: 2,699
- Joined: Jul 16, 2010
-
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
Ralphb07 wrote:Buycks failed his physical
Buycks and Stone failed physicals? Or was that a typo in the Kevin Bryant tweet
Doctor Drain wrote:Can a butterfly sing?
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
- JackFinn
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,121
- And1: 1,605
- Joined: Oct 08, 2006
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
Nate discussion on the Raps board
viewtopic.php?f=32&t=1263761
My favorite part:
viewtopic.php?f=32&t=1263761
Double Helix wrote:This is the source of this "rumor:"
http://m.journalpioneer.com/News/Local/ ... rm-Watch/1
See you Wodge and Stein! Looks like it's time for early retirement for you two! Kid blogger has the scoops!
Inevitable wrote:Chicago Bulls Rumors @chicagobullsbot 9h Toronto Raptors are looking at signing Nate Robinson or Rodrigue Beaubois as their backup PG according to a source. (Source: Kevin Bryant)
Seems legit, no?
dagger wrote:youreachiteach wrote:who is Kevin Bryant?
jval17 on this board, actually. He is not a journalist or blogger.
galacticos2 wrote:It's also funny that Kevin Rashidi aka Jval posted on his twitter about the Raptors gettin Rodrigue Beubois minutes after I posted on the board that the Raptors should get him
BAN THESE GUYS!
barrist wrote:he's watching this thread guys lol. he just called out dagger on Twitter.
Troubadour wrote:The real story here is Kevin Bryant firing SHOTS at Dagger over twitter.
@accfanto Excuse me? I'm not a journalist or a blogger? I'd beg to differ. How many NBA players/writers have you spoken to?How many articles
@accfanto have you written? That's right 0. Don't talk behind my back on a board. You know nothing about me or anything I know
TheRealBlizzy wrote:First Post:
Kevin Bryant @KevinRashidi 6h
@BuycksWorld23 Congrats on joining the Raptors!
Second Post:
Kevin Bryant @KevinRashidi 6h
@BuycksWorld23 Please follow back, would like to dm a media request. Thanks Dwight
Third Post:
Kevin Bryant @KevinRashidi 6h
Anybody got questions they want answered by Raptors new PG. Dwight Buycks? Let me know #RTZ
LOL
Troubadour wrote:barrist wrote:To be fair he does seem to have a portfolio of interviews with established NBA journalists (http://o.canada.com/author/kevrashidi/)
It's just a Q&A that's transcribed for the web. He's basically sent them 10 questions, they sent responses, and it was called an interview.
My favorite part:
N1QUE24 wrote:Scary how he can't even spell contributor correctly...
|Raptors insider|Toronto Raptors SSH|Contributer for http://Canada.com , http://DinoNationblog.com and http://ProBballReport.com |
barrist wrote:N1QUE24 wrote:Scary how he can't even spell contributor correctly...
|Raptors insider|Toronto Raptors SSH|Contributer for http://Canada.com , http://DinoNationblog.com and http://ProBballReport.com |
lol he just corrected it.
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
- Ben
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 26,799
- And1: 2,937
- Joined: Feb 09, 2006
Re: WT- Nate unlikely to be back
JackFinn wrote:Nate discussion on the Raps board
viewtopic.php?f=32&t=1263761Double Helix wrote:This is the source of this "rumor:"
http://m.journalpioneer.com/News/Local/ ... rm-Watch/1
See you Wodge and Stein! Looks like it's time for early retirement for you two! Kid blogger has the scoops!Zeno wrote: this a definitively non-tank move.
I was just about to write "fml," but then I saw your addition about the source and now I'm all "lol."
But it's still plausible that Nate would go there. Damn, I hope not.