Image ImageImage Image

Simmons: Why Bulls Should be Dwight's #1 Choice

Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23

User avatar
skoolboy180
Senior
Posts: 648
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 08, 2008

Simmons: Why Bulls Should be Dwight's #1 Choice 

Post#1 » by skoolboy180 » Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:10 pm

5. Chicago Bulls

And here's why the Dwight Howard era makes me nervous. As I've written before, God doles out the "complete car wash package" to only a handful of athletes. We love the ones who take care of it; we resent the ones who don't. Through seven years, Howard displayed every skill except one: an ongoing thirst to dominate everyone else. Shaq drifted through his career, made excuses, only intermittently stayed in shape and made a point to care about a variety of things — not just basketball — but during the 2000, 2001 and 2002 playoffs, history will show that he annihilated everyone in his path. (Same for Hakeem in the 1994 and 1995 playoffs, Moses in the 1983 playoffs … the list goes on and on.) Dwight hasn't had that moment yet. Never jumped a level when it mattered. Never dragged his teammates to a better place, made them feel invincible, made his opponents say, "Once that guy gets going, we're helpless." If anything, those opponents swung the other way, allowed him to get his stats and concentrated on shutting down everyone else (like Atlanta did last spring).

Quite simply, it's been weird to watch. The numbers say one thing; our eyes say something else. We're watching someone take care of the "complete car wash package," but not totally. And that infamous trade list summed everything up. How could the Chicago Bulls NOT be on it?

How could Howard not be thinking, "Get me to Chicago, I could win right away!"

How could Howard be looking at this NBA landscape without saying, "Maybe it's a good idea for me to team up with Derrick Rose, the 23-year-old MVP?"

How could someone in his camp not point out to him, "Hey Dwight, if you pushed for the Bulls, they could offer Joakim Noah, Luol Deng, Omer Asik, salary-cap filler and two no. 1 picks and take back your deal and Turkoglu's deal, and you'd still have Rose, Carlos Boozer, Rip Hamilton, Kyle Korver, Taj Gibson, whatever veterans they can bring in AND the best defensive coach in the league?"

And if you're picking a cold-weather team based on markets, point guards and branding opportunities, how could you pick Brooklyn (living in the shadow of the Knicks), Deron Williams, this goofy Nets ownership, a lousy supporting cast and a franchise with a sad-sack history over Chicago (the third-biggest market), Rose (better and younger than Williams), a better supporting cast, a shrewd ownership and one of the most rabid fan bases in the league?

Put it this way: If I'm Dwight Howard, I'm thinking about titles and titles only. I don't care about money — that's coming, regardless. I don't care about weather — I have to live in whatever city for only eight months a year, and I'm traveling during that entire time, anyway. I don't care about "building my brand" and all that crap — if I don't start winning titles soon, my brand is going to be "the center who's much better than every other center but can't win a title." I care only about playing in a big city, finding a team that doesn't have to demolish itself to acquire me, finding one All-Star teammate who can make my life a little easier (the Duncan to my Robinson), and winning titles. Not title … titles. I want to come out of this decade with more rings than anyone else. I want to be remembered alongside Shaq, Moses and Hakeem, not Robinson and Ewing.

If you're looking at it like that, Chicago has to be the choice. Two summers ago, I thought LeBron copped out by joining forces with his biggest rival; it just seemed peculiar that the most talented player of his generation, and possibly ever, would willingly become the Robin to someone else's Batman. Howard's trade list was peculiar for a different reason: Either he doesn't follow the league, cares about the wrong things, has the wrong people advising him, or all of the above. Because I can't imagine, for the life of me, why Dwight Howard wouldn't be scheming to become Derrick Rose's teammate right now.

As a basketball fan, I'm disappointed. As a Celtics fan, I'm delighted. Either way, the way he ignored Chicago tells me everything I need to know about Dwight Howard. Wherever he lands, that team will definitely win. I just don't know if it'll win. And neither do you.


http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/7352957/the-ninth-day-nba-christmas

**This is not the entire article, just the Bulls portion...FYI"
We all die, the goal is not to live forever, the goal is create something that will.
User avatar
LoveDaBoo
RealGM
Posts: 17,079
And1: 1,962
Joined: Jun 12, 2009
     

Re: Simmone: Why Bulls Should be Dwight's #1 Choice 

Post#2 » by LoveDaBoo » Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:13 pm

I was wondering who this "Simmone" was, and then I realized it read a lot like a Simmons piece. Ah-ha!
User avatar
ChiBulls09
Junior
Posts: 426
And1: 191
Joined: Apr 10, 2009
   

Re: Simmone: Why Bulls Should be Dwight's #1 Choice 

Post#3 » by ChiBulls09 » Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:13 pm

Nice :clap:
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 71,535
And1: 36,871
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: Simmone: Why Bulls Should be Dwight's #1 Choice 

Post#4 » by DuckIII » Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:14 pm

Everyone agrees with that except for Dwight Howard.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
khufure
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,939
And1: 1,464
Joined: Jul 08, 2010
Location: California
     

Re: Simmone: Why Bulls Should be Dwight's #1 Choice 

Post#5 » by khufure » Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:17 pm

whatever. who cares if anyone wants to come here. I think we can win with the pieces we have now. in fact that's the sweetest way to win IMO.
GetBuLLish
General Manager
Posts: 9,029
And1: 2,623
Joined: Jan 14, 2009

Re: Simmone: Why Bulls Should be Dwight's #1 Choice 

Post#6 » by GetBuLLish » Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:18 pm

DuckIII wrote:Everyone agrees with that except for Dwight Howard.


Yea. That kinda sucks.


LoveDaBoo wrote:I was wondering who this "Simmone" was


Somehow that's worse than how Kyrv calls Simmons "Billy." haha
User avatar
Bluewaterheaven
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,063
And1: 664
Joined: Jun 28, 2007
     

Re: Simmone: Why Bulls Should be Dwight's #1 Choice 

Post#7 » by Bluewaterheaven » Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:19 pm

khufure wrote:whatever. who cares if anyone wants to come here. I think we can win with the pieces we have now. in fact that's the sweetest way to win IMO.


With the pieces we have now, we could win a championship or two. If we got Dwight we would win at least three, and probably a lot more then that.
Unknown wrote:Dwarves laugh when they run because the grass tickles their balls.
bennjuiced34
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,560
And1: 2,009
Joined: Jun 21, 2009

Re: Simmone: Why Bulls Should be Dwight's #1 Choice 

Post#8 » by bennjuiced34 » Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:19 pm

I think it's pretty apparent that Dwight has interests other than winning and titles. He doesn't want to be in Derrick's shadow, he wants to build his brand and he is also looking at a career in acting.

Good luck with that Dwight.
chifan1798
RealGM
Posts: 14,741
And1: 2,883
Joined: Sep 15, 2006
   

Re: Simmone: Why Bulls Should be Dwight's #1 Choice 

Post#9 » by chifan1798 » Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:22 pm

LoveDaBoo wrote:I was wondering who this "Simmone" was, and then I realized it read a lot like a Simmons piece. Ah-ha!

Yeah, the being a celtics fan was what gave it away for me, lol, then I realized it was a typo.
Senor Chang
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,333
And1: 1,304
Joined: Jan 26, 2002
Location: Why do you teach Spanish?
Contact:

Re: Simmone: Why Bulls Should be Dwight's #1 Choice 

Post#10 » by Senor Chang » Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:24 pm

Dwight wants to be the man to avoid the same criticism Lebron got for being Robin in Miami. Derrick however is a much better fit for Dwight's game than either Wade or Bosh are to Lebron. His loss, between LA, Brooklyn, and Dallas, i don't think any of those teams + Dwight is going to stop the Bulls anytime soon. Only Miami and OKC worry me long-term.
wayoftheroad wrote:We’re getting bodied by Moochie Norris lmao
User avatar
PMONSTER
Head Coach
Posts: 6,400
And1: 1,301
Joined: Nov 28, 2009
     

Re: Simmons: Why Bulls Should be Dwight's #1 Choice 

Post#11 » by PMONSTER » Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:25 pm

Funny thing about living in Rose's shadow is that if they were to team up and win 6 rings (calm down everyone) then I could easily see them sharing the Finals MVP awards.
NBA Playoffs.... I can never wait!
khufure
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,939
And1: 1,464
Joined: Jul 08, 2010
Location: California
     

Re: Simmone: Why Bulls Should be Dwight's #1 Choice 

Post#12 » by khufure » Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:29 pm

hey guys, if we could get a lineup like

drose
egordon
durant
love
howard

we'd win at least 6 titles. but our front office sucks/is cheap so it's not gonna happen..
GetBuLLish
General Manager
Posts: 9,029
And1: 2,623
Joined: Jan 14, 2009

Re: Simmone: Why Bulls Should be Dwight's #1 Choice 

Post#13 » by GetBuLLish » Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:29 pm

khufure wrote:whatever. who cares if anyone wants to come here. I think we can win with the pieces we have now. in fact that's the sweetest way to win IMO.


I pretty much feel the same way. I know if we got Howard, I'd be happy too. But there's just something about seeing this team, as constructed, play it out. Something about reading "Noah hitting mid-range jump shots at practice" that makes me excited. Or hearing that Deng has been working even more on 3 point shooting. Or hearing that Boozer went to Amsterdam to have experimental surgery done so that he would become 5 years younger, except it turned out that the doctor was not actually a doctor but just some crazy man high out of his mind and trying to replace hair on Boozer's scalp.

It's these little things that make following the Bulls even more enjoyable.
User avatar
JackFinn
RealGM
Posts: 15,121
And1: 1,605
Joined: Oct 08, 2006

Re: Simmons: Why Bulls Should be Dwight's #1 Choice 

Post#14 » by JackFinn » Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:29 pm

an old joystick
Harden
Durant
Ibaka. Or not. Who cares.
Howard

Paul/Williams
Billups/Foye
Butler
A guy. Named Chaz Bono.
Howard

Rose
Hamilton/Korver
Brewer
Boozer/Taj
Howard

No one. Just 4 players on the court.
Wade
James.
Actually, scratch that. 3 players.
Howard


Dwight did not include these teams in his list. He did this because *and then I say something that somehow makes a semblance of sense*
User avatar
kyrv
RealGM
Posts: 60,434
And1: 3,788
Joined: Jan 02, 2003
Location: Intimidated by TNT

Re: Simmone: Why Bulls Should be Dwight's #1 Choice 

Post#15 » by kyrv » Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:33 pm

khufure wrote:hey guys, if we could get a lineup like

drose
egordon
durant
love
howard

we'd win at least 6 titles. but our front office sucks/is cheap so it's not gonna happen..


Is this too big for a sig?

This is awesome.
Bill Walton wrote: Keep the music playing.
User avatar
LoveDaBoo
RealGM
Posts: 17,079
And1: 1,962
Joined: Jun 12, 2009
     

Re: Simmone: Why Bulls Should be Dwight's #1 Choice 

Post#16 » by LoveDaBoo » Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:34 pm

Senor Chang wrote:Dwight wants to be the man to avoid the same criticism Lebron got for being Robin in Miami. Derrick however is a much better fit for Dwight's game than either Wade or Bosh are to Lebron. His loss, between LA, Brooklyn, and Dallas, i don't think any of those teams + Dwight is going to stop the Bulls anytime soon. Only Miami and OKC worry me long-term.

The real tragedy here is this: Dwight on the Bulls would be a force capable of shutting the three homogoes out of the Finals. Could there be anything more awesome in the history of humanity than the Heat teaming up, losing in the finals in their first season, and then being shut out of the finals by another superteam formed the following year?
User avatar
kulaz3000
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 42,637
And1: 24,852
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: Simmons: Why Bulls Should be Dwight's #1 Choice 

Post#17 » by kulaz3000 » Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:35 pm

Another thing, I've mentioned previously even when we had the hope of courting LeBron or even Wade was that if it's the spotlight that Dwight so deseperately desires and feels that he won't get that with Rose being around, he is a damn fool.

Can anyone imagine Rose complaining or being disgruntled if Dwight were to garner all the attention, well at least from the media and fans as long as they are winning? I highly doubt that. As much as Rose seemingly has opened up to the media more recently, he is still a reluctant public figure in my opinion, and he could thrive with a personality like Dwight by his side. Allow Dwight to be the public face, allow him to play the silly clown so he can just go about his business and win, win and win.
Why so serious?
suckfish
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,534
And1: 1,273
Joined: Jun 12, 2007

Re: Simmone: Why Bulls Should be Dwight's #1 Choice 

Post#18 » by suckfish » Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:38 pm

DuckIII wrote:Everyone agrees with that except for Dwight Howard.


I don't see how this will be an obstacle..
User avatar
jc23
RealGM
Posts: 27,414
And1: 12,219
Joined: May 31, 2010
Location: 1901 W.Madsion St
     

Re: Simmons: Why Bulls Should be Dwight's #1 Choice 

Post#19 » by jc23 » Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:41 pm

As a basketball fan, I'm disappointed. As a Celtics fan, I'm delighted. Either way, the way he ignored Chicago tells me everything I need to know about Dwight Howard. Wherever he lands, that team will definitely win. I just don't know if it'll win. And neither do you.


and there it is.
"Showing off is the fool's idea of glory"

-Bruce Lee
User avatar
blumeany
RealGM
Posts: 16,670
And1: 2,551
Joined: Feb 05, 2003
Location: Chicago
       

Re: Simmons: Why Bulls Should be Dwight's #1 Choice 

Post#20 » by blumeany » Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:43 pm

kulaz3000 wrote:Another thing, I've mentioned previously even when we had the hope of courting LeBron or even Wade was that if it's the spotlight that Dwight so deseperately desires and feels that he won't get that with Rose being around, he is a damn fool.

Can anyone imagine Rose complaining or being disgruntled if Dwight were to garner all the attention, well at least from the media and fans as long as they are winning? I highly doubt that. As much as Rose seemingly has opened up to the media more recently, he is still a reluctant public figure in my opinion, and he could thrive with a personality like Dwight by his side. Allow Dwight to be the public face, allow him to play the silly clown so he can just go about his business and win, win and win.


Exactly! Howard could not ask for a better superstar teammate. Rose would gladly step into the shadows and let Dwight do all the talking. As Rose has said ad nauseum: "I just want to wiiiin"
2024: Maybe there's some hope?

Return to Chicago Bulls