the ultimates wrote:Then you really haven't been paying attention. Their have been ton of threads asking essentially the same question of how good will Rose be just worded slightly differently. Many of the same people who say that he'll never be anything close to what he once was cite these ten games.
Many people say the 10 games prove he'll be a superstar again, and the talent isn't a question, only whether he can stay healthy.
Looking at the status above in this thread, that's clearly not the case. He stunk in those 10 games.
However, if it isn't explicitly stated, there is no proof over what Derrick will do. There is only opinion based on various objective and subjective data points.
If someone wants to say Rose won't be good and uses as evidence the following:
1: He wasn't good in his 10 games back
2: Effectively no one misses two years and comes back to play well, I can't think of any counter example at all really.
Well, there's something to be said for that set of evidence.
If someone wants to counter with:
1: He looked athletic but just rusty in those 10 games, and with more time likely would have improved
2: The sample size of quality players who've missed two years under similar circumstances is so small it's not that relevant
Well, I could get that too.