push wrote:I don't know much about what would work for trades, but getting rid of Niko and Portis is a plus in its own, but acquiring Aldridge at the same time? Is that a valid trade?
There's absolutely no chance that happens lol.
Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, Payt10, RedBulls23, coldfish, fleet, AshyLarrysDiaper, kulaz3000, Michael Jackson
push wrote:I don't know much about what would work for trades, but getting rid of Niko and Portis is a plus in its own, but acquiring Aldridge at the same time? Is that a valid trade?
High level wrote:Just found out spurs may shop Aldridge for whatever reason. I would trade Niko and portis or taj if we have to for Aldridge.
Brad Biggs wrote:Fields was in the bottom third of the league in too many key statistical metrics for the Bears to commit to the idea of trading down from the first pick for a bundle of future assets and then building around him.
fleet wrote:Stratmaster wrote:fleet wrote:A drawback of Hoiberg being such a green coach. A tenured coach with lots of built in gravitas could conceivably make a call like that and have the team fall in line. As such, you may have a guy that simply cannot make best use of his roster
Or, we may once again be making the mistake as a board of looking at rooks and journeyman level players performance in summer leagues and preseason and assigning way too much significance to it. I would much rather have Rondo getting the ball to our alphas than Canaan, and neither Wade nor Butler are prepared to fill a point role while also being the main scorers. I have seen nothing in Canaan's history to indicate he is anything more than a 3 point specialist, and nothing to indicate he is starter material, despite managing to get starts half the time on the worst team in the NBA.
Hoiberg was not afraid to bench Noah. He was not afraid to bench Mirotic. Rondo was brought here to start, and if you believe benching Noah caused rifts try doing it to Rondo and see what happens. That has nothing to do with Hoiberg's gravitas. Thibs was more guilty of granting entitlement minutes than Hoiberg has been.
Safe to say a couple guys didn't respect Hoiberg last season, Noah or not. I have no reason to expect that to change much if the guy thought a given lineup move was hard to sell this time around either. It would he hard for any coach to sell something like this. Not necessarily a Hoiberg specific problem. But if Canon did happen to work better with the starters, it is doubtful that Hoiberg could pull it off without bickering as you say. It would be more of a thing that Hoiberg could run during the game rather than starting necessarily. It would be up to Hoiberg to get a guy like Rondo to accept sacrifice of some overall minutes in this example. Degree of confidence would be low in Hoiberg's ability to get Rondo to do it, but Rondo does seem enthusiastic. Im guessing because he thinks he can run all over Hoiberg
fleet wrote:High level wrote:Just found out spurs may shop Aldridge for whatever reason. I would trade Niko and portis or taj if we have to for Aldridge.
I'm guessing guys like Valentine and or MCW would be included. Especially Valentine. Pop must drool over that guy.
push wrote:the ultimates wrote:push wrote:I did, which is why I'm not putting myself through it again two seasons in a row, unless they improve.
Improve in wins, playoffs, personnel. Which ways
Improve in that they look like an actual team running smooth offense instead of looking lost out there and turning the ball over for no reason. If they can play with energy and make it fun to watch them, it's an improvement. From what I've seen in preseason, there's just sloppiness, and if anyone thinks they will turn around the play enough to actually accomplish that, they're in denial. They'll probably get it together enough to get more wins than last season, and clean up turnovers, but we will still be bad, and we will not look good enough to watch.
weneeda2guard wrote:I am actually more surprised at some of our good showings, and in not disappointed at all, this Charlotte game, was them coming out very hot, which happens quite often when you are a team with a target on you, once we settled in, defense kicked up, found some defense for kemba, we came back and was poised to wipe them out in the 4th, but we benched our starters and our bench, basically out 3rd string took them to ot.
I'm more impressed with the fact that we know Charlotte pnr'd us to death and pretty much ran us off the floor last season, and sample size, preseason of course, they couldn't do that to us this time around because we defended it a lot better. They just hit some tough shots and we came out cold. Once we got into our groove and there shooting came back down to earth we gained control. But the point is, we didn't get pnr'd to death, so just that much was improvement from last season.
kulaz3000 wrote:The Heat were a mess and extremely inconsistent and sloppy when they first formed the now infamous Big 3. It takes time.
If anyone was expecting smooth sailing from the get-go you were only fooling yourself, especially if you remind yourself that we have added new starters in Lopez, Wade and Rondo, and you could even put Taj as a relatively new starter in a new role. And to add, Jimmy is now shifting to the small forward spot, no it's not a major shift but it is a change in position nonetheless.
My point is, it was inevitable that there was going to be an adjustment period and I remind myself of that every single game, especially in the preseason. A vast majority of the team is different, addition of dominate players in the starting line up, I'd be shocked if we didn't start the season quite sloppy and poorly, so much so that a majority of the fans will likely want everyone traded by game 5. But I do feel we have enough talent on this team that we can get close to 50 wins this season and hit our stride by around game 20.