DuckIII wrote:Mark K wrote:Bulls03 wrote:Rose has never been a good defender. There's no excuse for it.
This isn't true. He definitely could play defense during his peak, but you were likely a Heat fan during that stretch so you probably wouldn't have noticed.
No, it's true. Rose was never a good defender. He improved to the point that he was no longer bad and a liability, but he never became affirmatively good.
It's also true that there was no excuse for it.
I disagree on two counts.
First, in his 3rd and 4th years IMO he was definitely a plus defender, especially when it was most needed against the tougher PGs.
I also disagree that there wasn't an excuse for it. You know how color guys and other media types often praise a guy who is great both ways and talk about how difficult it is? That's cause it is. It takes extreme stamina and strength to play at a high level on both ends.
Now consider that due to play style, it may be a fair claim that in his first few years, Rose exerted himself more on the offensive end more than any player in the league. He simply didn't have enough juice to go all out on the other end all the time. Had to pick his spots.
After his injuries he's just been a poor defender so much of the time because he's afraid of injury and lacks some motivation IMO.