Bulls have offer from Bucks(via Thessaloniki)

biggestbullsfan · Post #61 » by **biggestbullsfan** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:01 pm

Who is the source for this again and is it legit?

Chicago-Bull-E · Post #62 » by **Chicago-Bull-E** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:01 pm

Would anyone like minny be willing to trade 6 for 10 and 16? Id do it.

biggestbullsfan · Post #63 » by **biggestbullsfan** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:01 pm

Who is the source for this again and is it legit?

biggestbullsfan · Post #64 » by **biggestbullsfan** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:01 pm

Who is the source for this again and is it legit?

BG43 · Post #65 » by **BG43** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:01 pm

Oh man, so many rumors I can't even keep track.

I would do this in a heartbeat, Ridnour is a very solid backup pg, but I agree with some of you that it sounds a little steep for Kirk, but a man can dream!

GOBULLS · Post #66 » by **GOBULLS** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:02 pm

bulletbill wrote:Lets say the rumored deal of 16 + 26 for the Nets 11th pick goes down, as well as this trade for the Bucks 10th. Do you:

- keep both picks
-Trade up to keep
-Make a move for Bosh now

Thabeet in a package for Bosh sounds real good to me.

I'll believe it when i see it confirmed...but hell of a deal for the Bulls. IF we also got the 11th pick from the Nets, I would sent Toronto a package of players including the #11 pick and 2010 1st round pick fo Bosh. I would pick Henderson (or DeRozan if he slips) with the 10th pick.

Ralphb07 · Post #67 » by **Ralphb07** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:02 pm

kulaz3000 wrote:
Ralphb07 wrote:it seems too good to be true. Luke is a nice back up PG and Elson would be a nice big to have on the bench

the 10th pick would be huge. We can land Derozan, Williams or Henderson and still have the 16th for TH, Blair and the 26th for a overseas guy

It would be us in major 2010 mode

In my opinion, we just aren't going into next season with 2 rookies. I think it's one rookie, and the other spots will be filled with veterans.

Quite frankly, if what you said above happens, I honestly wouldn't be upset by trading both picks to a team like the Thunder and the Wolves for their picks next year, then keep our 10.

Blair is NBA ready and for 1.2mil you won't find a FA big that will rebound better than him( Thanks Chad Ford) so he makes sense

Williamsn and Henderson are both NBA ready and fill a need to and again what the rookie pay scale is and their upside why not take it

26th should be a player we can stash away for the year... Think about it going to 2010 the only large contract would be is Deng and we will have young players like Noah, Rose, 10th, 16th, 26th, Omer to fill out the roster which are cheap contracts

theanimal23 · Post #68 » by **theanimal23** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:03 pm

biggestbullsfan wrote:Who is the source for this again and is it legit?

Just gotta take the word of one of our long-time posters.

Mr X · Post #69 » by **Mr X** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:03 pm

The best thing about the trade is it the 10 pick gives the Bulls a lot of versitility. Personally I would first try to trade picks for either Bosh or Amare. If that doesn't work I'd try get Harden who could end up being better than BG down the line. even if the Bulls stay pat something along the lines of DeRozan/Hill at 10, Blair/TH at 16, and Ellington/Douglas at 26 would really be a good day IMO

BullsFan123 · Post #70 » by **BullsFan123** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:04 pm

The Bucks must be the WORST drafting team in the past decade, so maybe it isn't is steep price for them to pay afterall. You know they will screw up the draft big time anyway.

tyrususi007 · Post #71 » by **tyrususi007** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:06 pm

I would have to say that Kirk is better player for Milwaukee then any player their front office could draft for them...lol

Sk23 · Post #72 » by **Sk23** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:06 pm

Do it.....Just do it!!!

Chi Dynasty12 · Post #73 » by **Chi Dynasty12** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:06 pm

If Kirk is going, this is the deal to make. Then Package 10 + 16 in a package for Bosh.

Ralphb07 · Post #74 » by **Ralphb07** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:06 pm

Looks like RealGm had a little glich. Double posting my last post

Post #75 » by **Ben** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:06 pm

sdeezy wrote:Sounds like a very good trade. I'm not so excited about having 3 rookies from a trash draft. If we can package all 3 and move up to get Harden, i'll be pleased

That's about the only way I would get really, really excited from this draft. I put the chances at lower than 1.7%, but if we could turn #10, 16 and 26 into Harden-- who I don't actually think is going to fall-- I would be ecstatic. Rose & Harden could be an incredible tandem for the future. Not gonna happen, though. Gerald Henderson's gonna be a major comedown for anyone who's dreaming of Harden.

theanimal23 · Post #76 » by **theanimal23** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:08 pm

Gerald Henderson is a let down at 10. With the assets we have, we should move into the 6-8 range

JeremyB0001 · Post #77 » by **JeremyB0001** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:09 pm

Better than what I would've guessed we could do from an assets perspective but if we can't resign BG without finding a deal for Kirk that saves us money this season then that complicates everything considerably.

biggestbullsfan · Post #78 » by **biggestbullsfan** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:12 pm

Ben B. wrote:
sdeezy wrote:Sounds like a very good trade. I'm not so excited about having 3 rookies from a trash draft. If we can package all 3 and move up to get Harden, i'll be pleased

That's about the only way I would get really, really excited from this draft. I put the chances at lower than 1.7%, but if we could turn #10, 16 and 26 into Harden-- who I don't actually think is going to fall-- I would be ecstatic. Rose & Harden could be an incredible tandem for the future. Not gonna happen, though. Gerald Henderson's gonna be a major comedown for anyone who's dreaming of Harden.

He wouldnt be terrible for wnyone thinking that losing Ben is throwing away our season. I think we still make the Playoffs if we had HArden and started him. Doubt we do though. Teo rookies in this draft isnt bad though. Derozan and Hill could fall to 10 though. Im not sold on Derozan but Hill would be amazing.

theanimal23 · Post #79 » by **theanimal23** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:12 pm

JeremyB0001 wrote:Better than what I would've guessed we could do from an assets perspective but if we can't resign BG without finding a deal for Kirk that saves us money this season then that complicates everything considerably.

Move Jerome James ($6 million toward the cap, but insurance covers half), $3 million in cash, and #26 for a second rounder.

We trim his cap number, and we would be paying the $3 million regardless if he is on our team or not. This way we can have the money to spend on Gordon. But Uncle Jerry would be pissed with this idea.

Luke NOT Luc · Post #80 » by **Luke NOT Luc** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:12 pm

I had to leave work for 10 minutes and this happens!! Has anyone clarified this? Is it real?