Bulls have offer from Bucks(via Thessaloniki)

AAU Teammate · Post #81 » by **AAU Teammate** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:18 pm

I hope we dont lock. This is fun to me. As long as these sorts of things arent cluttering , they have value to me. Besides the original incarnation of the Hughes/Gooden deal started as such.

Luke NOT Luc · Post #82 » by **Luke NOT Luc** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:20 pm

Is there any link or any source to lend any credibility to this rumor?

Grand Champ · Post #83 » by **Grand Champ** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:21 pm

You know what hilarious thought just popped into my head?

Skiles coaching Yi

:rofl:

Mr X · Post #84 » by **Mr X** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:21 pm

biggestbullsfan wrote:Is it only me or does this seem too good to be true? So good its unrealistic. I am a huge Hinrich fan but unless Skiles owes kirk a leg, doesnt this seem to be an overpayment for kirk?

Skiles would get an erection faster for Hinrich then I would for Megan Fox.

theheel · Post #85 » by **theheel** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:21 pm

if this is true...i havnt read the whole thread..

after the trade we should dangle the 10th, 16th, and 26th + tryrus + salary filler to make contracts work for bosh signed and extended (assuming toronto wants to and bosh wants to).

Luke NOT Luc · Post #86 » by **Luke NOT Luc** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:22 pm

The only thing that makes me think this is true is that it is Skiles. Being cheap, I'd also imagine the Bucks being fond of Hinrich's diminishing contract

MJ-23 · Post #87 » by **MJ-23** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:23 pm

Ok.. If this is true it has to be done

Hinrich and the Bulls need to move on

Ridnour is Hinrich but his defense is like a European prospect trying to guard LeBron.
Elson.. 3rd string back up
10th pick.. Flynn or maybe Derozen

AAU Teammate · Post #88 » by **AAU Teammate** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:23 pm

theheel wrote:if this is true...i havnt read the whole thread..

after the trade we should dangle the 10th, 16th, and 26th + tryrus + salary filler to make contracts work for bosh signed and extended (assuming toronto wants to and bosh wants to).

i'm sure others could beat this type of offer easily

crkone · Post #89 » by **crkone** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:26 pm

Bucks fan here. We do not like this as it doesn't help us with our goal of getting rid of long term contracts, and stunts developing our Sessions/Mbah a Moute/Bogut core. I don't see why they would want to get rid of useful expirings for a diminishing PG, when they could possibly flip them at the deadline for younger players.

Luke NOT Luc · Post #90 » by **Luke NOT Luc** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:26 pm

I wasn't thinking about all those picks for Bosh, because I really don't think Bosh is going anywhere before the deadline and even then, I'm not buying it. What is intriguing is if we have all these picks, we should be able to trade up for an even higher pick and get one of the only few players in this draft that actually have value, Harden definitely comes to mind

nomorezorro · Post #91 » by **nomorezorro** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:26 pm

just out of curiosity why would sources in greece have the inside scoop on something like this

Luke NOT Luc · Post #92 » by **Luke NOT Luc** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:27 pm

crkone wrote:Bucks fan here. We do not like this as it doesn't help us with our goal of getting rid of long term contracts, and stunts developing our Sessions/Mbah a Moute/Bogut core. I don't see why they would want to get rid of useful expirings for a diminishing PG, when they could possibly flip them at the deadline for younger players.

Because Skiles LOVES him some Kirk Hinrich and Sessions can't defend

Luke NOT Luc · Post #93 » by **Luke NOT Luc** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:27 pm

I'm still holding my breath until I read this somewhere other than here, but if true, you gotta do it

Legendary 33 · Post #94 » by **Legendary 33** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:30 pm

What's with Skiles' man crush on kirk? I'd still do this deal though.. we can make sure elson and ridnour never see a minute of playing time, and we can draft james johnson or hopefully demar derozan if he slips

Legendary 33 · Post #95 » by **Legendary 33** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:33 pm

nomorezorro wrote:just out of curiosity why would sources in greece have the inside scoop on something like this

lmao

The Explorer · Post #96 » by **The Explorer** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:34 pm

I smell bs...

sonny · Post #97 » by **sonny** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:34 pm

nomorezorro wrote:just out of curiosity why would sources in greece have the inside scoop on something like this

Skiles used to coach/play in Greece, so he has contacts there.

crkone · Post #98 » by **crkone** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:35 pm

Luke NOT Luc wrote:
crkone wrote:Bucks fan here. We do not like this as it doesn't help us with our goal of getting rid of long term contracts, and stunts developing our Sessions/Mbah a Moute/Bogut core. I don't see why they would want to get rid of useful expirings for a diminishing PG, when they could possibly flip them at the deadline for younger players.

Because Skiles LOVES him some Kirk Hinrich and Sessions can't defend

If they have a problem with his defense, they can just draft Flynn or Holiday since one of them would be there. And from what I have seen from both, they have good fundamentals and can move great laterally.

Sinistar6 · Post #99 » by **Sinistar6** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:39 pm

This offer and the Portland offer seem to good to be true. I call BS on both, and if Hinrich is moved it will be for a very meh deal focused specifically on resigning Gordon.

However if by some miracle either of these trades go through I will pledge my love to Guy Forpaxson.

Luke NOT Luc · Post #100 » by **Luke NOT Luc** » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:42 pm

crkone wrote:
Luke NOT Luc wrote:
crkone wrote:Bucks fan here. We do not like this as it doesn't help us with our goal of getting rid of long term contracts, and stunts developing our Sessions/Mbah a Moute/Bogut core. I don't see why they would want to get rid of useful expirings for a diminishing PG, when they could possibly flip them at the deadline for younger players.

Because Skiles LOVES him some Kirk Hinrich and Sessions can't defend

If they have a problem with his defense, they can just draft Flynn or Holiday since one of them would be there. And from what I have seen from both, they have good fundamentals and can move great laterally.

But it's not the same. You can't draft fond memories