Page 1 of 1

Sanchez Signed

Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:18 pm
by ajaX82
We nabbed Anibal Sanchez for 5 years, 80 million. Expensive, sure. But our top-4 of Verlander, Scherzer, Fister and Sanchez is so deep. Throwi in Smyly (we need a lefty) and that means it is probably time to trade Porcello, who other teams are reported to be interested in.

Nice move though

Re: Sanchez Signed

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 12:22 am
by Snakebites
That's a lot of money, I really really hope he can come close to living up to that.

He certainly pitched great for us down the stretch, but part of me expected that we'd look elsewhere at that price tag. No doubt about it we have a formidable rotation, though.

Look to see Rick traded now, though.

Re: Sanchez Signed

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:11 am
by joseph mamah
way too much money, this signings going to come back to bite us.

Re: Sanchez Signed

Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 8:00 pm
by ajaX82
joseph mamah wrote:way too much money, this signings going to come back to bite us.


Luckily with no salary cap it doesn't really matter, as long as your owner can afford it. But money is real and this is one of the reasons I suspect Rick and/or Boesch will be on the block, as they will continue to become more expensive by the year. Check the arbitration projections below

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2012/10/p ... 4dT5CW4.99

Great article on this subject also, for those interested:

http://www.blessyouboys.com/detroit-tig ... scal-cliff

Re: Sanchez Signed

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 9:20 pm
by ajaX82
Some fun Porcello rumors:

Rick to LAA for Bourjous or Trumbo. Pretty intriguing, depends if you want arguably the best defensive OF in baseball (Hunter, Jackson, Bourjous) or another power monster who is poor defensively (Trumbo)

Rick to Pitt for Hanrahan. Solves the closer problem, but I think I would need a prospect or two coming back

The really fun one: Rick to Texas for Andrus. Keep it mind this is very, very much a rumor, but damn wouldn't this be perfect?

Re: Sanchez Signed

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 3:29 pm
by Lionlifer
ajaX82 wrote:Some fun Porcello rumors:

Rick to LAA for Bourjous or Trumbo. Pretty intriguing, depends if you want arguably the best defensive OF in baseball (Hunter, Jackson, Bourjous) or another power monster who is poor defensively (Trumbo)

Rick to Pitt for Hanrahan. Solves the closer problem, but I think I would need a prospect or two coming back

The really fun one: Rick to Texas for Andrus. Keep it mind this is very, very much a rumor, but damn wouldn't this be perfect?


Those all work for me, especially the last.

Re: Sanchez Signed

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:21 am
by Blkbrd671
ajaX82 wrote:Some fun Porcello rumors:

Rick to LAA for Bourjous or Trumbo. Pretty intriguing, depends if you want arguably the best defensive OF in baseball (Hunter, Jackson, Bourjous) or another power monster who is poor defensively (Trumbo)

Rick to Pitt for Hanrahan. Solves the closer problem, but I think I would need a prospect or two coming back

The really fun one: Rick to Texas for Andrus. Keep it mind this is very, very much a rumor, but damn wouldn't this be perfect?



i'd be really happy with any of those, but i feel the best fit would be Andrus , he brings a different bat to the line up,his defense is at a impact position and speed will help. Additionally this allows us to move Jhonny for maybe Justin upton. HOW SICK WOULD THAT BE!

As much as i would love Trumbo, we need more defense than offense, however i'd be stoked with him in the lineup.


i like hanrahan but i would also want prospects back, if not more

Re: Sanchez Signed

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 7:05 pm
by Snakebites
Porcello hasn't been any kind of a fit for our infield defense for years.

I have absolutely no sense of the trade value of players in baseball, but I'd be surprised if we were able to land a guy like Andrus for him.

Re: Sanchez Signed

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:45 pm
by Blkbrd671
Snakebites wrote:Porcello hasn't been any kind of a fit for our infield defense for years.

I have absolutely no sense of the trade value of players in baseball, but I'd be surprised if we were able to land a guy like Andrus for him.



i think Andrus is possible but we would have to give up either garcia or another prospect

Re: Sanchez Signed

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 12:02 am
by Blkbrd671
Per DFP, the Rangers didn't land Justin Upton because they wouldn't part with Andrus. Doesn't look like porcello's going to cut it and/or porcello+prospects

Re: Sanchez Signed

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 2:41 am
by ajaX82
I really don't think we could land Andrus, but love the rumor. We'd have to move at least Garcia with Porcello. The Angels rumors seem much more realistic to me

Re: Sanchez Signed

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 4:22 pm
by Lionlifer
Is Sanchez now the highest paid Tigers pitcher?

Makes me wonder how much JV and Max will get when they are due.

Re: Sanchez Signed

Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 4:57 pm
by Snakebites
^Probably best not to think about it.

When does Verlander's contract run out?

Re: Sanchez Signed

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 12:56 am
by ajaX82
Angels just traded Morales, which frees up room for Bourjous and Trumbo to both play regularly. In short, that fake trade scenario is toast

Re: Sanchez Signed

Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 2:36 am
by Blkbrd671
SON OF A b*!

Re: Sanchez Signed

Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 8:48 pm
by joseph mamah
ajaX82 wrote:
joseph mamah wrote:way too much money, this signings going to come back to bite us.


Luckily with no salary cap it doesn't really matter, as long as your owner can afford it. But money is real and this is one of the reasons I suspect Rick and/or Boesch will be on the block, as they will continue to become more expensive by the year. Check the arbitration projections below

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2012/10/p ... 4dT5CW4.99

Great article on this subject also, for those interested:

http://www.blessyouboys.com/detroit-tig ... scal-cliff


even if there isnt a cap a bad signing still hurts your team, unless you're the Yankees. giving a 5 year deal to a pitcher is very risky, especially that kind of money to a borderline guy. it was only a couple of years ago that we had something like 30 million tied up in players that werent even on the team anymore, we dont need to go down that road again.