yardbarker

Lucroy extended: 5 years, club option for 6th

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

ImageImage

Re: Lucroy extended: 5 years, club option for 6th

Postby jr lucosa on Wed Mar 28, 2012 12:00 pm

5 years 11 million is a great deal I don't know how anyone can't like that. Bill Michaels was talking about it yesterday and he was saying every catcher gets compared to Johnny Bench and Mike Piazza and that Lucroy wasn't at that level. Man he's such an idiot.
Mediocrity is our strength. We like to play to our strengths.
User avatar
jr lucosa
Forum Mod
 
Posts: 7845
And1: 47
Joined: Jul 10, 2008

Re: Lucroy extended: 5 years, club option for 6th

Postby Kerb Hohl on Wed Mar 28, 2012 3:45 pm

Not only is Michaels an idiot, but as long as LuCroy didn't get hurt...this is what he would have gotten paid anyways through his years of arbitration.

He basically gave us a year of his free agency for financial security if he gets a career-ending injury tomorrow.

That's one of the more annoying things when nobody realizes that these guys are under team control regardless. My Facebook blew up with "zOMG Gallardo will be a Brewer for 5 more years!" when at the time he was, what, 4 years still within team control?
GrendonJennings wrote:2011-2012: 32-34
2012-2013: 42-40
2013-2014: 39-43
2014-2015: 44-38
2015-2016: 35-47
2016-2017: 40-42
2017-2018: (Las Vegas)
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
 
Posts: 18189
And1: 11
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: Lucroy extended: 5 years, club option for 6th

Postby El Duderino on Thu Mar 29, 2012 7:55 pm

GrendonJennings wrote:Not only is Michaels an idiot, but as long as LuCroy didn't get hurt...this is what he would have gotten paid anyways through his years of arbitration.

He basically gave us a year of his free agency for financial security if he gets a career-ending injury tomorrow.


He may have ended up making more through his years of arbitration if he continues to improve as a player.

That said, your main point is true and i understand why young players sign contracts like this, especially pitchers. Sure, if they stay healthy the odds are that they'll have left money on the table, but being able to secure 10-25 million depending on the quality of the player is worth securing their financial future for the most part in case of serious injury. A lot of these guys have a wife and kid/kids and i believe Lucroy does himself, 11 million dollars guaranteed goes a long way to making sure his family is set up well, even if something terrible happened to him.
User avatar
El Duderino
RealGM
 
Posts: 15409
And1: 7
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

Re: Lucroy extended: 5 years, club option for 6th

Postby jimmybones on Fri Mar 30, 2012 7:35 am

jr lucosa wrote:5 years 11 million is a great deal I don't know how anyone can't like that. Bill Michaels was talking about it yesterday and he was saying every catcher gets compared to Johnny Bench and Mike Piazza and that Lucroy wasn't at that level. Man he's such an idiot.


Bill Michaels is reallyyyyy bad.
User avatar
jimmybones
Starter
 
Posts: 2380
And1: 6
Joined: May 29, 2009

Re: Lucroy extended: 5 years, club option for 6th

Postby ArodpwnsFavre on Fri Mar 30, 2012 11:44 am

Great deal and Value for what we paid. Lucroy is a SOLID catcher. 11 mil for 5 years is a great value... Considering what STL paid for Molina.... He is obviously better than Lucroy, but I prefer Lucroy at 2 mil over what they paid molina, any day.
ArodpwnsFavre
Sophomore
 
Posts: 214
And1: 1
Joined: Oct 4, 2011

Re: Lucroy extended: 5 years, club option for 6th

Postby Kerb Hohl on Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:06 pm

ArodpwnsFavre wrote:Great deal and Value for what we paid. Lucroy is a SOLID catcher. 11 mil for 5 years is a great value... Considering what STL paid for Molina.... He is obviously better than Lucroy, but I prefer Lucroy at 2 mil over what they paid molina, any day.


Different situations. LuCroy couldn't demand anything, he wouldn't have been a free agent for 4 more years. Molina was going to be a free agent.
GrendonJennings wrote:2011-2012: 32-34
2012-2013: 42-40
2013-2014: 39-43
2014-2015: 44-38
2015-2016: 35-47
2016-2017: 40-42
2017-2018: (Las Vegas)
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
 
Posts: 18189
And1: 11
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: Lucroy extended.

Postby Relentless88 on Fri Mar 30, 2012 3:40 pm

DrugBust wrote:In related news, the Brewers are going to let Marcum get to free agency. I'll say the same thing about the trade that I did last year. If he helps the Brewers get to the World Series I won't care that we gave up Laurie.

I don't understand this logic. Don't you think Lawrie could help the Brewers get to the World Series? A rotation with Gallardo/Greinke at the top with a middle of the lineup featuring Braun/Lawrie is quite scary.
User avatar
Relentless88
RealGM
 
Posts: 11461
And1: 20
Joined: Apr 8, 2008

Re: Lucroy extended.

Postby beyond_the_arc on Fri Mar 30, 2012 9:16 pm

Relentless88 wrote:
DrugBust wrote:In related news, the Brewers are going to let Marcum get to free agency. I'll say the same thing about the trade that I did last year. If he helps the Brewers get to the World Series I won't care that we gave up Laurie.

I don't understand this logic. Don't you think Lawrie could help the Brewers get to the World Series? A rotation with Gallardo/Greinke at the top with a middle of the lineup featuring Braun/Lawrie is quite scary.


Grienke agreed to the trade to come to Milwaukee because the Brewers had already made the move for Marcum.
Postby SubyWill on Fri Mar 01, 2013 7:53 pm

Magic fan checking in, holy **** Harris is legit. Your GM should be fired.


No ****.
User avatar
beyond_the_arc
Starter
 
Posts: 2037
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 10, 2005

Re: Lucroy extended.

Postby Relentless88 on Sat Mar 31, 2012 9:54 am

beyond_the_arc wrote:
Relentless88 wrote:
DrugBust wrote:In related news, the Brewers are going to let Marcum get to free agency. I'll say the same thing about the trade that I did last year. If he helps the Brewers get to the World Series I won't care that we gave up Laurie.

I don't understand this logic. Don't you think Lawrie could help the Brewers get to the World Series? A rotation with Gallardo/Greinke at the top with a middle of the lineup featuring Braun/Lawrie is quite scary.


Grienke agreed to the trade to come to Milwaukee because the Brewers had already made the move for Ahh, I forgot about that. Does that mean Greinke will only extend if Marcum is extended? :-?
User avatar
Relentless88
RealGM
 
Posts: 11461
And1: 20
Joined: Apr 8, 2008

Re: Lucroy extended: 5 years, club option for 6th

Postby livestrong4ever on Sun Apr 01, 2012 12:39 am

really like this, he turned into a pretty good defensive catcher last year, and his offensive game will improve hes still young.

like others have said will be nice to get greinke resigned to have him and gallardo for a few more years. maybe next year pelrta and jungman. jungman 4 year college pitcher, who knows how many years of minor league he needs, i am predicting very good things from him.
Image
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtrP6Okkt24
User avatar
livestrong4ever
General Manager
 
Posts: 8543
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 23, 2005
Location: Roaring down the river.

Re: Lucroy extended.

Postby livestrong4ever on Sun Apr 01, 2012 12:42 am

I don't understand this logic. Don't you think Lawrie could help the Brewers get to the World Series? A rotation with Gallardo/Greinke at the top with a middle of the lineup featuring Braun/Lawrie is quite scary.



at the time we traded him he was still a prospect, no one could of predicted the grand success he could of had. obviously right now he is worth more then marcum.

but that being said, starting pitching is more valuable then offense when the playoffs start, and in september. would much rather have a top of the rotation guy then anther good offensive thirdbasemen.
Image
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtrP6Okkt24
User avatar
livestrong4ever
General Manager
 
Posts: 8543
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 23, 2005
Location: Roaring down the river.

Re: Lucroy extended: 5 years, club option for 6th

Postby Kerb Hohl on Sun Apr 01, 2012 12:18 pm

If you're saying nobody could have predicted Lawrie's success as a prospect, he was pretty sure-fire. More sure-fire than hoping a guy that throws 85 MPH batting practice balls that need to be thrown in a 3x3 inch zone to not be blasted out of the stadium is still really effective.
GrendonJennings wrote:2011-2012: 32-34
2012-2013: 42-40
2013-2014: 39-43
2014-2015: 44-38
2015-2016: 35-47
2016-2017: 40-42
2017-2018: (Las Vegas)
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
 
Posts: 18189
And1: 11
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: Lucroy extended: 5 years, club option for 6th

Postby WEFFPIM on Sun Apr 01, 2012 12:59 pm

GrendonJennings wrote:If you're saying nobody could have predicted Lawrie's success as a prospect, he was pretty sure-fire. More sure-fire than hoping a guy that throws 85 MPH batting practice balls that need to be thrown in a 3x3 inch zone to not be blasted out of the stadium is still really effective.


No one is sure-fire. Are there a lot of things to like about Lawrie? Yes, and they could very well pan out given early returns. But given the 2010 season from both McGehee and the pitching staff, there was a clear need, and it wasn't at third.

I'm not saying I'm a massive fan of the deal. But two things: For a trade like this where a coveted prospect who pans out is given up, there's a trade where a coveted prospect that doesn't pan out is given up. For every Brett Lawrie, there's a Matt Laporta. For every Nelson Cruz, there's a Jeremy Jeffress. And two, if it results in a World Series, I don't give a flying f*** about who the Brewers gave up to get one. It almost did last year, and might this year.
Me never said I to make sense much
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
 
Posts: 37520
And1: 21
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.

Re: Lucroy extended: 5 years, club option for 6th

Postby Kerb Hohl on Sun Apr 01, 2012 1:02 pm

Yeah I wasn't completely bashing the trade (though I was much less a fan of this one) I was just responding to livestrong saying that Lawrie was a prospect and had chance to bust. So did Marcum (he pitched pretty well, but I'm not expecting anything this year and beyond).
GrendonJennings wrote:2011-2012: 32-34
2012-2013: 42-40
2013-2014: 39-43
2014-2015: 44-38
2015-2016: 35-47
2016-2017: 40-42
2017-2018: (Las Vegas)
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
 
Posts: 18189
And1: 11
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: Lucroy extended: 5 years, club option for 6th

Postby WEFFPIM on Sun Apr 01, 2012 1:12 pm

GrendonJennings wrote:Yeah I wasn't completely bashing the trade (though I was much less a fan of this one) I was just responding to livestrong saying that Lawrie was a prospect and had chance to bust. So did Marcum (he pitched pretty well, but I'm not expecting anything this year and beyond).


Marcum's September and postseason tainted what was a very, very good year for him. His style of pitching should allow him to replicate it since it's not so reliant on speed. It's whether or not he can find his spots. I'm not sure we can expect more from him than what the Brewers got last year, but if he's managed better at the end of the year, that should be fine.
Me never said I to make sense much
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
 
Posts: 37520
And1: 21
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.

PreviousNext

Return to Milwaukee Brewers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users