Kerb Hohl wrote:Prickle wrote:trwi7 wrote:Barnes would have a job but yeah, I'm not sure what people expected when we took on the trash that the Pirates, Orioles and Braves (last year with Torres) didn't want.
If some team is willing to blow us away for Knebel, I'd trade him too.
I'd for sure take a deal for Knebel. I'm just getting that "lightning in a bottle" vibe from him, and fear it won't be sustainable. (See Derrick Turnbow)
You're talking about something being not sustainable after trumpeting Eric Sogard's winning ways for a week?
Yeah, because I totally said that Sogard would be able to sustain his level of play throughout an entire season
. My beef was that having the hottest hitter on the team (and maybe the league) for a month straight, sit on the bench in favor of guys who weren't even giving you MLB-caliber at-bats, was maybe not the best strategy for winning games. As I said numerous times.....of course he wouldn't be able to continue to produce at that rate, but why would you not ride a guy while he's on fire? I mean, for a stretch there, he was getting on base almost every time he came to the plate. Then he sat for like 5 games (which the team lost), only to come back and continue getting on base at an alarming rate despite still not being an everyday player.
Using a basketball analogy: It's like having a guy hit 7 three-pointers in the first half, and then benching him in the second half, simply because that quality of play is "unsustainable". Of course no NBA coach would do that (well, maybe Kidd) because they know that they should ride the hot hand for as long as they possibly can.
I never said that Sogard would continue to produce the way he has - that would be impossible. I only said that he should continue to play almost everyday until he finally fell back to earth.