ImageImageImageImageImage

2012 Minor Leagues/Prospect Discussion Thread

Moderators: Alfred, Rhettmatic, Schad

User avatar
Schad
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 40,015
And1: 3,638
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: I am not, and never have been, a member of the Communist bandwagon
     

Re: 2012 Minor Leagues/Prospect Discussion Thread 

Post#271 » by Schad » Thu Apr 19, 2012 1:02 am

Blah doesn't quite cover it; starting Chavez is wretch-worthy, if it comes to that. Worse than Laffey. Quite surprised that we're not going with Carreno, and I'd be stunned if it's Hutch.
Dwane Casey, on Rudy Gay's record-breaking 11 for 37 shooting night:

"We had to put the ball in Rudy’s hands. He had it going."


Treadmill now, treadmill tomorrow, treadmill forevermore.
flatjacket1
Analyst
Posts: 3,078
And1: 19
Joined: Oct 27, 2009

Re: 2012 Minor Leagues/Prospect Discussion Thread 

Post#272 » by flatjacket1 » Thu Apr 19, 2012 1:06 am

Schadenfreude wrote:Blah doesn't quite cover it; starting Chavez is wretch-worthy, if it comes to that. Worse than Laffey. Quite surprised that we're not going with Carreno, and I'd be stunned if it's Hutch.


Apparently Carreno was going deep into counts in LV, which scares AA for some reason. Chavez isn't terrible, better than Laffey for sure.
Avp115 wrote:Bautista>>Mike Trout and Kendrick
User avatar
There There
Veteran
Posts: 2,606
And1: 197
Joined: Dec 04, 2008
     

Re: 2012 Minor Leagues/Prospect Discussion Thread 

Post#273 » by There There » Thu Apr 19, 2012 1:40 am

flatjacket1 wrote:
Schadenfreude wrote:Blah doesn't quite cover it; starting Chavez is wretch-worthy, if it comes to that. Worse than Laffey. Quite surprised that we're not going with Carreno, and I'd be stunned if it's Hutch.


Apparently Carreno was going deep into counts in LV, which scares AA for some reason. Chavez isn't terrible, better than Laffey for sure.


You cannot be serious

Chavez is likely a much worse option than Laffey.

He has made four starts since 2005, three of them this year. He has been mediorce to awful as a reliever. He would be the 2012 right handed version of Dana Eveland and Jo-Jo Reyes.

If Chavez is starting for this team, Anthopolous has lost his **** mind.
User avatar
Schad
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 40,015
And1: 3,638
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: I am not, and never have been, a member of the Communist bandwagon
     

Re: 2012 Minor Leagues/Prospect Discussion Thread 

Post#274 » by Schad » Thu Apr 19, 2012 1:50 am

flatjacket1 wrote:
Schadenfreude wrote:Blah doesn't quite cover it; starting Chavez is wretch-worthy, if it comes to that. Worse than Laffey. Quite surprised that we're not going with Carreno, and I'd be stunned if it's Hutch.


Apparently Carreno was going deep into counts in LV, which scares AA for some reason. Chavez isn't terrible, better than Laffey for sure.


Chavez is unquestionably terrible. His xFIP is a little better than Laffey's, but that's because xFIP takes one look at his insane HR rate and says "holy ****, there's no possible way that's sustainable." But then you look at the fact that he's a power pitcher who has surrendered 1.0 HR/9 over his past 150 IP in the minors, and you realize that yeah, it's quite possible that it is in fact sustainable.
Dwane Casey, on Rudy Gay's record-breaking 11 for 37 shooting night:

"We had to put the ball in Rudy’s hands. He had it going."


Treadmill now, treadmill tomorrow, treadmill forevermore.
User avatar
Trilogy
RealGM
Posts: 11,414
And1: 380
Joined: Oct 13, 2005

Re: 2012 Minor Leagues/Prospect Discussion Thread 

Post#275 » by Trilogy » Thu Apr 19, 2012 1:55 am

I don't get why a guy like Chavez is getting a look, if they are going the stop gap route it makes more sense to let either Villanueva or Perez start and keeping Evan Crawford in the pen.
User avatar
satyr9
Analyst
Posts: 3,736
And1: 386
Joined: Aug 09, 2006
     

Re: 2012 Minor Leagues/Prospect Discussion Thread 

Post#276 » by satyr9 » Thu Apr 19, 2012 2:39 pm

Trilogy wrote:I don't get why a guy like Chavez is getting a look, if they are going the stop gap route it makes more sense to let either Villanueva or Perez start and keeping Evan Crawford in the pen.


Well, I think if either was the plan there would've been a conditioning stint or something by now to try and stretch them out a bit, but I wonder if they might consider something like what they're doing in the low minors and for the one start on Saturday let Villanueva and Perez go 3 each and get Carreno for the next one. I'd say there's almost zero chance of that happening, but I'm not certain that wouldn't be a stronger move than rushing Hutch or calling up Chavez. It could potentially wreak a bit of havoc on the rest of the 'pen though as they'd need recovery time.
User avatar
Lateral Quicks
RealGM
Posts: 10,348
And1: 3,631
Joined: Dec 05, 2002
   

Re: 2012 Minor Leagues/Prospect Discussion Thread 

Post#277 » by Lateral Quicks » Thu Apr 19, 2012 4:08 pm

At this point I'd be surprised if it wasn't Hutch. Farrell loves him, and AA has publicly stated that a promotion wouldn't hinder his progression (ala Alvarez's early promotion). They also don't want a stopgap, and that's precisely what Chavez (who?) would be.

Personally I thought Carreno did well enough to deserve another shot, but as of now I believe Hutch is the better starter.
Al_Oliver
Rookie
Posts: 1,165
And1: 32
Joined: Nov 20, 2011
       

Re: 2012 Minor Leagues/Prospect Discussion Thread 

Post#278 » by Al_Oliver » Thu Apr 19, 2012 4:10 pm

satyr9 wrote:
Trilogy wrote:I don't get why a guy like Chavez is getting a look, if they are going the stop gap route it makes more sense to let either Villanueva or Perez start and keeping Evan Crawford in the pen.


Well, I think if either was the plan there would've been a conditioning stint or something by now to try and stretch them out a bit, but I wonder if they might consider something like what they're doing in the low minors and for the one start on Saturday let Villanueva and Perez go 3 each and get Carreno for the next one. I'd say there's almost zero chance of that happening, but I'm not certain that wouldn't be a stronger move than rushing Hutch or calling up Chavez. It could potentially wreak a bit of havoc on the rest of the 'pen though as they'd need recovery time.


The best option was Carreno, not sure why they had him start in Vegas last night. Makes far more sense to have him go and not change other players' roles
LBJSeizedMyID
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,432
And1: 34
Joined: Jul 22, 2009

Re: 2012 Minor Leagues/Prospect Discussion Thread 

Post#279 » by LBJSeizedMyID » Thu Apr 19, 2012 4:47 pm

Trilogy wrote:I don't get why a guy like Chavez is getting a look, if they are going the stop gap route it makes more sense to let either Villanueva or Perez start and keeping Evan Crawford in the pen.


Agree with this. How many days between starts for Villanueva? They can't fit him anywhere, here's a perfect situation.
User avatar
jim todd
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,869
And1: 76
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
       

Re: 2012 Minor Leagues/Prospect Discussion Thread 

Post#280 » by jim todd » Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:23 pm

Like everyone else, I'm surprised it won't be Carreno. At the same time, I'd love to see Hutch in action.
Image
Michael Bradley
General Manager
Posts: 8,063
And1: 710
Joined: Feb 25, 2004

Re: 2012 Minor Leagues/Prospect Discussion Thread 

Post#281 » by Michael Bradley » Thu Apr 19, 2012 8:11 pm

If the Jays were willing to use a stop-gap 5th starter with McGowan injured I think they probably would have gone with Cecil or Laffey right out of the gate. If I were a betting man, I'd say Hutchison will get the nod.
User avatar
satyr9
Analyst
Posts: 3,736
And1: 386
Joined: Aug 09, 2006
     

Re: 2012 Minor Leagues/Prospect Discussion Thread 

Post#282 » by satyr9 » Thu Apr 19, 2012 9:10 pm

Al_Oliver wrote:The best option was Carreno, not sure why they had him start in Vegas last night. Makes far more sense to have him go and not change other players' roles


Well I'm actually quite happy if they identified something they didn't like about his mechanics (non-repeating delivery I think I) and want to work on getting things right rather than going on his results and hoping he'll continue to be okay.

Really the Laffey up and down that keeps him from being eligible to return in time is the one that I don't get. Not that I'm in a tearing hurry to watch Laffey pitch for the Jays, but this seems to be exactly the situation he was signed for. It's not like they didn't know when they needed a 5th again.
flatjacket1
Analyst
Posts: 3,078
And1: 19
Joined: Oct 27, 2009

Re: 2012 Minor Leagues/Prospect Discussion Thread 

Post#283 » by flatjacket1 » Thu Apr 19, 2012 10:20 pm

satyr9 wrote:Really the Laffey up and down that keeps him from being eligible to return in time is the one that I don't get. Not that I'm in a tearing hurry to watch Laffey pitch for the Jays, but this seems to be exactly the situation he was signed for. It's not like they didn't know when they needed a 5th again.


I completely agree with this. Although I don't like the idea of Laffey, why shoot yourself in the foot and not allow yourself at least the option. It seems like either a rookie mistake or somehow a planned move?

I don't know.
Avp115 wrote:Bautista>>Mike Trout and Kendrick
User avatar
vaff87
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,898
And1: 1,522
Joined: Oct 22, 2003
     

Re: 2012 Minor Leagues/Prospect Discussion Thread 

Post#284 » by vaff87 » Fri Apr 20, 2012 1:15 am

Nicolino, Sanchez, and Syndergaard have now combined for 27 innings, 15 hits, 9 walks, 35 strike outs, and 0 runs, by my count.
User avatar
Graham's Cracker
Analyst
Posts: 3,074
And1: 402
Joined: Nov 12, 2004
Location: location location

Re: 2012 Minor Leagues/Prospect Discussion Thread 

Post#285 » by Graham's Cracker » Fri Apr 20, 2012 1:34 am

Danny Barnes blows his first save at Dunedin this year. He gave up an uncharacteristic 4 walks in two-thirds.

Woj had a good start though. 6 IP 6 Hits 1 ER 1 BB

Crouse and Knecht have both thrown a runner out at the plate.

Marisnick has two hits including a 2B, has a SB too, his fourth.
User avatar
Graham's Cracker
Analyst
Posts: 3,074
And1: 402
Joined: Nov 12, 2004
Location: location location

Re: 2012 Minor Leagues/Prospect Discussion Thread 

Post#286 » by Graham's Cracker » Fri Apr 20, 2012 1:53 am

Marisnick got his third hit in the 9th a single and walkoff RBI to win the game.
User avatar
Graham's Cracker
Analyst
Posts: 3,074
And1: 402
Joined: Nov 12, 2004
Location: location location

Re: 2012 Minor Leagues/Prospect Discussion Thread 

Post#287 » by Graham's Cracker » Fri Apr 20, 2012 2:54 am

D'Arnaud has his first HR of the season.

Sierra has his 4th and Snider is continuing to get it done 2-3 (Has a hit in all 12 games to start the season) with a BB, RBI, 2 runs scored and a SB. Footsteps Mr. Thames.
User avatar
blackflash234
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,729
And1: 37
Joined: Jun 30, 2008

Re: 2012 Minor Leagues/Prospect Discussion Thread 

Post#288 » by blackflash234 » Fri Apr 20, 2012 2:58 am

With Hutchison now promoted to the Blue Jays, I wonder who gets promoted to Double A soon.
User avatar
Graham's Cracker
Analyst
Posts: 3,074
And1: 402
Joined: Nov 12, 2004
Location: location location

Re: 2012 Minor Leagues/Prospect Discussion Thread 

Post#289 » by Graham's Cracker » Fri Apr 20, 2012 3:01 am

blackflash234 wrote:With Hutchison now promoted to the Blue Jays, I wonder who gets promoted to Double A soon.

Asher? He's had back-to-back good starts and a full season in A+.
Al_Oliver
Rookie
Posts: 1,165
And1: 32
Joined: Nov 20, 2011
       

Re: 2012 Minor Leagues/Prospect Discussion Thread 

Post#290 » by Al_Oliver » Fri Apr 20, 2012 1:31 pm

satyr9 wrote:
Al_Oliver wrote:The best option was Carreno, not sure why they had him start in Vegas last night. Makes far more sense to have him go and not change other players' roles


Well I'm actually quite happy if they identified something they didn't like about his mechanics (non-repeating delivery I think I) and want to work on getting things right rather than going on his results and hoping he'll continue to be okay.

Really the Laffey up and down that keeps him from being eligible to return in time is the one that I don't get. Not that I'm in a tearing hurry to watch Laffey pitch for the Jays, but this seems to be exactly the situation he was signed for. It's not like they didn't know when they needed a 5th again.


Good point, do you think that is that what happened?
Now that Hutch seems to be getting the start, I have no problem with the move they made...

Return to Toronto Blue Jays