The New Turf
Moderator: JaysRule15
Re: The New Turf
- Geddy
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 69,869
- And1: 78,609
- Joined: Nov 30, 2005
- Location: Drinking an extra cole Sprite
Re: The New Turf
the turf looks like it has some lines on it now so I'm wondering if they have been running something over it to make it a little less softer. The balls hit on the ground also don't seem to die as fast as they did in the first few games
Inevitable wrote:Geddy is a good mod actually
Re: The New Turf
- BigLeagueChew
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,041
- And1: 4,088
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Location: Catcher
Re: The New Turf
Park Factors from ESPN
Rogers Centre ranks as follows:
Runs: 22nd
HR'S: 15th
HITS: 19th
Doubles: 23rd
Triples: 6th
Walks: 12th
Here is last years ranking on the old turf
Runs: 9th
HR's: 3rd
Hits: 7th
Doubles: 6th
Triples: 10th
Walks: 27th
Any of these numbers surprising to anyone considering the new turf? Right now these numbers would indicate a neutral park instead of something favorable to hitters, especially if something is hit on the ground. Line drives or pop fly's are a different story. Keep in mind with these stats that we have the best offense in baseball right now and some pitching that needs sorting.
http://espn.go.com/mlb/stats/parkfactor
Rogers Centre ranks as follows:
Runs: 22nd
HR'S: 15th
HITS: 19th
Doubles: 23rd
Triples: 6th
Walks: 12th
Here is last years ranking on the old turf
Runs: 9th
HR's: 3rd
Hits: 7th
Doubles: 6th
Triples: 10th
Walks: 27th
Any of these numbers surprising to anyone considering the new turf? Right now these numbers would indicate a neutral park instead of something favorable to hitters, especially if something is hit on the ground. Line drives or pop fly's are a different story. Keep in mind with these stats that we have the best offense in baseball right now and some pitching that needs sorting.
http://espn.go.com/mlb/stats/parkfactor
Re: The New Turf
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,094
- And1: 211
- Joined: Dec 28, 2002
Re: The New Turf
BigLeagueChew wrote:Park Factors from ESPN
Rogers Centre ranks as follows:
Runs: 22nd
HR'S: 15th
HITS: 19th
Doubles: 23rd
Triples: 6th
Walks: 12th
Here is last years ranking on the old turf
Runs: 9th
HR's: 3rd
Hits: 7th
Doubles: 6th
Triples: 10th
Walks: 27th
Any of these numbers surprising to anyone considering the new turf? Right now these numbers would indicate a neutral park instead of something favorable to hitters, especially if something is hit on the ground. Line drives or pop fly's are a different story. Keep in mind with these stats that we have the best offense in baseball right now and some pitching that needs sorting.
http://espn.go.com/mlb/stats/parkfactor
I wonder what the runs scored would be in the games played this year, if we we're still playing on the green concrete?
The Doubles # stands out to me the most, those gap balls are just dying and getting cut off, from what I've seen watching the games.
Would be interesting to revisit these numbers later in the year and see if anything normalizes close to what we saw last season.
That's what she said.
The New Turf
- Santoki
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,813
- And1: 2,635
- Joined: Feb 16, 2007
- Location: Toronto
The New Turf
I don't think Walks is a relevant statistic. Also, let's wait until the end of the year to look at these stats.
Re: The New Turf
- rarefind
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,044
- And1: 10,055
- Joined: May 25, 2006
- Location: Toronto, Ontario
Re: The New Turf
I'd be interested in double plays turned as well.
Re: The New Turf
- Skin Blues
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,624
- And1: 871
- Joined: Nov 24, 2010
Re: The New Turf
I think singles would be the most relevant, although park factors are really not valid without a few years of data anyway. Something like BABIP on groundballs would probably be reliable if it was available.
Re: The New Turf
- BigLeagueChew
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,041
- And1: 4,088
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Location: Catcher
Re: The New Turf
Raps_Swingman wrote:I wonder what the runs scored would be in the games played this year, if we we're still playing on the green concrete?
The Doubles # stands out to me the most, those gap balls are just dying and getting cut off, from what I've seen watching the games.
Would be interesting to revisit these numbers later in the year and see if anything normalizes close to what we saw last season.
Well our offense would have more runs per game, our pitching is tough to say because our only groundball starting pitcher is Sanchez, his problems early were throwing strikes, the rest of our starters are mostly strikeout pitchers and more prone to fly balls.
rarefind wrote:I'd be interested in double plays turned as well.
Will try to find those numbers.
Santoki wrote:I don't think Walks is a relevant statistic. Also, let's wait until the end of the year to look at these stats.
It's not but ESPN listed them for some reason.
Skin Blues wrote:I think singles would be the most relevant, although park factors are really not valid without a few years of data anyway. Something like BABIP on groundballs would probably be reliable if it was available.
Agreed, although their have been over 3500 plate appearance at Rogers Centre already this season. The turf might get quicker
Re: The New Turf
- BigLeagueChew
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,041
- And1: 4,088
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Location: Catcher
Re: The New Turf
Another interesting link for park factors here by handedness(LHB/RHB)
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/sortable/index.php?cid=1830256
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/sortable/index.php?cid=1830256