ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
Moderator: JaysRule15
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,692
- And1: 16,319
- Joined: Nov 26, 2012
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
Just a bad game, it happens. Twice with the bases juiced and nothing to show for it, Donaldson has been a bit shaky tonight, and of course the 1st inning debacle.
Rep T Dot, till they bury me.
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
- Jays4WS
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 879
- And1: 1,415
- Joined: Jul 03, 2015
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
Graham's Cracker wrote:Saw this posted on twitter:
MLB Rule Book Section V, Subsection F:A runner attempts to score on a play at the plate. The catcher misses the tag on the runner, and the runner fails to touch home plate, but the umpire calls a tag and the runner "out." The offensive manager challenges the call, and the Replay Official determines that the catcher missed the tag. The Replay Official shall disregard the failure of the runner to touch home plate, declare the runner "safe" and score the run.
Great we have umps and replay judges that don't even know the rules.
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,969
- And1: 3,546
- Joined: Mar 19, 2008
- Location: Toronto
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
Graham's Cracker wrote:Saw this posted on twitter:
MLB Rule Book Section V, Subsection F:A runner attempts to score on a play at the plate. The catcher misses the tag on the runner, and the runner fails to touch home plate, but the umpire calls a tag and the runner "out." The offensive manager challenges the call, and the Replay Official determines that the catcher missed the tag. The Replay Official shall disregard the failure of the runner to touch home plate, declare the runner "safe" and score the run.
the play passed through two layers of umpiring and they still got it wrong. this game should currently be played under protest and because it isn't, it should be formally protested upon it's conclusion.
galacticos2 wrote:MLB needs to introduce an Amnesty clause. Bautista would be my first victim.
Bautista outplays his contract by more than $70 million over the next four seasons (2013-2016).
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,707
- And1: 70,824
- Joined: Oct 22, 2003
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
Graham's Cracker wrote:Saw this posted on twitter:
MLB Rule Book Section V, Subsection F:A runner attempts to score on a play at the plate. The catcher misses the tag on the runner, and the runner fails to touch home plate, but the umpire calls a tag and the runner "out." The offensive manager challenges the call, and the Replay Official determines that the catcher missed the tag. The Replay Official shall disregard the failure of the runner to touch home plate, declare the runner "safe" and score the run.
So these clowns don't even know the rule book?
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 33,521
- And1: 19,064
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
Graham's Cracker wrote:Saw this posted on twitter:
MLB Rule Book Section V, Subsection F:A runner attempts to score on a play at the plate. The catcher misses the tag on the runner, and the runner fails to touch home plate, but the umpire calls a tag and the runner "out." The offensive manager challenges the call, and the Replay Official determines that the catcher missed the tag. The Replay Official shall disregard the failure of the runner to touch home plate, declare the runner "safe" and score the run.
But maybe they took into account the fact that Hanigan tagged him after the initial play? And that was what they were basing the out call on?
Either way, it seems certain the Jays got screwed there.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,707
- And1: 70,824
- Joined: Oct 22, 2003
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
Randle McMurphy wrote:Graham's Cracker wrote:Saw this posted on twitter:
MLB Rule Book Section V, Subsection F:A runner attempts to score on a play at the plate. The catcher misses the tag on the runner, and the runner fails to touch home plate, but the umpire calls a tag and the runner "out." The offensive manager challenges the call, and the Replay Official determines that the catcher missed the tag. The Replay Official shall disregard the failure of the runner to touch home plate, declare the runner "safe" and score the run.
But maybe they took into account the fact that Hanigan tagged him after the initial play? And that was what they were basing the out call on?
Either way, it seems certain the Jays got screwed there.
They had already called Valencia out. Ergo, play is dead.
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
- Graham's Cracker
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,203
- And1: 647
- Joined: Nov 12, 2004
- Location: location location
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
That was the way I interpreted it too. Nothing is black and white though. Who knows.vaff87 wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:
But maybe they took into account the fact that Hanigan tagged him after the initial play? And that was what they were basing the out call on?
Either way, it seems certain the Jays got screwed there.
They had already called Valencia out. Ergo, play is dead.
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 33,521
- And1: 19,064
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
vaff87 wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:
But maybe they took into account the fact that Hanigan tagged him after the initial play? And that was what they were basing the out call on?
Either way, it seems certain the Jays got screwed there.
They had already called Valencia out. Ergo, play is dead.
You would assume so.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 674
- And1: 113
- Joined: Nov 01, 2014
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
11 runners stranded by Collabello
Re: Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,757
- And1: 1,854
- Joined: Mar 21, 2015
Re: Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
s e n s i wrote:Graham's Cracker wrote:Saw this posted on twitter:
MLB Rule Book Section V, Subsection F:A runner attempts to score on a play at the plate. The catcher misses the tag on the runner, and the runner fails to touch home plate, but the umpire calls a tag and the runner "out." The offensive manager challenges the call, and the Replay Official determines that the catcher missed the tag. The Replay Official shall disregard the failure of the runner to touch home plate, declare the runner "safe" and score the run.
the play passed through two layers of umpiring and they still got it wrong. this game should currently be played under protest and because it isn't, it should be formally protested upon it's conclusion.
I agree.
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
- Lateral Quicks
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,290
- And1: 16,359
- Joined: Dec 05, 2002
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
Pillar now 15 points away from batting .300.
And Reyes is awful. Such an undisciplined hitter at this point.
And Reyes is awful. Such an undisciplined hitter at this point.
Nick Nurse recounting his first meeting with Kawhi:
“We could have gone forever. (Raptors management) kept knocking on the door and I was like, ‘A couple more minutes.’ Because we were really into it."
“We could have gone forever. (Raptors management) kept knocking on the door and I was like, ‘A couple more minutes.’ Because we were really into it."
Re: Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,835
- And1: 4,913
- Joined: Jan 24, 2010
Re: Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
dballislife wrote:3 of 4 a must
Well f that
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
- TOStateofMind
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,566
- And1: 21,305
- Joined: Jul 16, 2008
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
what a disappointing series
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
- xAIRNESSx
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,650
- And1: 13,059
- Joined: Jan 06, 2005
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
Wow, after seeing how the rule is actually written, we totally got screwed over.
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 40,525
- And1: 13,448
- Joined: Aug 19, 2002
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
xAIRNESSx wrote:Wow, after seeing how the rule is actually written, we totally got screwed over.
The media view is pretty unanimous now. Whether Valencia actually touched the plate is irrelevant.
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
- kayliecee
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,837
- And1: 3,505
- Joined: Feb 09, 2013
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
Fairview4Life wrote:kayliecee wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:There was nothing on the replay that showed definitively Danny touched the plate, so I get not calling him safe on replay. But how do you justify an out call there instead?
This just isn't our day.
They don't have to justify an out. They can only overturn it if Valencia was clearly safe. Otherwise, they go with what the ump said.
They can call it interference on the replay though, which it clearly was.
After reading the rule, I think you're right.
John Gibbons: "I have to do what's best for these guys and not what some bozo on RealGM thinks." (Paraphrasing)
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
- BigLeagueChew
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,041
- And1: 4,088
- Joined: May 26, 2011
- Location: Catcher
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
[tweet]https://twitter.com/BKennedyStar/status/616802786550743040[/tweet]
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
- kayliecee
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,837
- And1: 3,505
- Joined: Feb 09, 2013
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
Graham's Cracker wrote:Saw this posted on twitter:
MLB Rule Book Section V, Subsection F:A runner attempts to score on a play at the plate. The catcher misses the tag on the runner, and the runner fails to touch home plate, but the umpire calls a tag and the runner "out." The offensive manager challenges the call, and the Replay Official determines that the catcher missed the tag. The Replay Official shall disregard the failure of the runner to touch home plate, declare the runner "safe" and score the run.
...unless the defensive Manager appeals the failure of the runner to touch home plate prior to the Crew Chief making contact with the Replay Official.
Maybe Farrell appealed.
John Gibbons: "I have to do what's best for these guys and not what some bozo on RealGM thinks." (Paraphrasing)
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
- kayliecee
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,837
- And1: 3,505
- Joined: Feb 09, 2013
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
Looking at the Boston feed, it's pretty clear Valencia missed home plate. And he knew it too, which is why he attempted to go back. Also, there was no interference. The catcher had the ball before he moved his foot in front of home plate.
John Gibbons: "I have to do what's best for these guys and not what some bozo on RealGM thinks." (Paraphrasing)
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 33,521
- And1: 19,064
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: ST: Red Sox @ Blue Jays | June 29 - July 2nd | Sportsnet
kayliecee wrote:Graham's Cracker wrote:Saw this posted on twitter:
MLB Rule Book Section V, Subsection F:A runner attempts to score on a play at the plate. The catcher misses the tag on the runner, and the runner fails to touch home plate, but the umpire calls a tag and the runner "out." The offensive manager challenges the call, and the Replay Official determines that the catcher missed the tag. The Replay Official shall disregard the failure of the runner to touch home plate, declare the runner "safe" and score the run.
...unless the defensive Manager appeals the failure of the runner to touch home plate prior to the Crew Chief making contact with the Replay Official.
Maybe Farrell appealed.
[tweet]https://twitter.com/ArdenZwelling/status/616816318306586624[/tweet]
Their explanation was that the Hanigan tag after the fact was the "appeal." So yeah, they're making this up as they go along.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.