ImageImageImageImageImage

Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements

Moderator: JaysRule15

User avatar
Rhettmatic
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,081
And1: 14,547
Joined: Jul 23, 2006
Location: Toronto
   

Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements 

Post#21 » by Rhettmatic » Fri Jan 15, 2016 10:16 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/bnicholsonsmith/status/688120859689537536[/tweet]
Image
Sig by the one and only Turbo_Zone.
User avatar
Jays4WS
Pro Prospect
Posts: 879
And1: 1,415
Joined: Jul 03, 2015
     

Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements 

Post#22 » by Jays4WS » Fri Jan 15, 2016 10:18 pm

We didn't agree with Donaldson over 450k.

Good job Ownership.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
dagger
RealGM
Posts: 40,577
And1: 13,498
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements 

Post#23 » by dagger » Fri Jan 15, 2016 10:31 pm

Yea, kind of dumb considering some of the big gaps out there - Moustakas, Arrieta, etc. Seems like an odd hill for management to die on.
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
User avatar
bluerap23
Head Coach
Posts: 6,399
And1: 6,574
Joined: Aug 15, 2012
   

Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements 

Post#24 » by bluerap23 » Fri Jan 15, 2016 10:56 pm

Cecil gets 400K more than expected, Hutch gets 400K less.
Image
User avatar
bluerap23
Head Coach
Posts: 6,399
And1: 6,574
Joined: Aug 15, 2012
   

Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements 

Post#25 » by bluerap23 » Fri Jan 15, 2016 11:01 pm

SharoneWright wrote:
dagger wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/ShiDavidi/status/688059273788678144[/tweet]


Nats gonna sign Revere for 8.376M just for kicks.

Seriously, I'd rather Shapiro was in on that arb case than Rizzo... seems odd.


Stoeren was expected to get 8.8 so I hope not.
Image
User avatar
bluerap23
Head Coach
Posts: 6,399
And1: 6,574
Joined: Aug 15, 2012
   

Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements 

Post#26 » by bluerap23 » Fri Jan 15, 2016 11:03 pm

The Nationals have struck a one-year deal with just-acquired outfielder Ben Revere for $6.25MM, Jon Heyman tweets. Revere had been projected by MLBTR to earn a $6.7MM salary next year.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/ben-revere
Image
Raptors Realtor
Analyst
Posts: 3,007
And1: 2,854
Joined: Jul 16, 2009
Location: Toronto, ON
Contact:

Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements 

Post#27 » by Raptors Realtor » Fri Jan 15, 2016 11:05 pm

Very odd logic for an ownership/GM who gave Saunders a $250k raise... You gotta give Donaldson the extra $450k to make the best player on the team and MVP happy, especially when that salary isn't unreasonable for a player with that pedigree... What arbitrator isn't going to be in favour of honouring Donaldson's salary arb request? #stupidmovejays
cram
Head Coach
Posts: 6,180
And1: 1,699
Joined: Feb 08, 2004

Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements 

Post#28 » by cram » Fri Jan 15, 2016 11:07 pm

Stupid move on Donaldson.
User avatar
changes
Head Coach
Posts: 6,800
And1: 9,124
Joined: Dec 08, 2012
Location: Vancouver
       

Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements 

Post#29 » by changes » Fri Jan 15, 2016 11:28 pm

Rhettmatic wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/bnicholsonsmith/status/688120859689537536[/tweet]

Unbelievable lol.
Image
dagger
RealGM
Posts: 40,577
And1: 13,498
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements 

Post#30 » by dagger » Fri Jan 15, 2016 11:38 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/ShiDavidi/status/688142129357406208[/tweet]

[tweet]https://twitter.com/ShiDavidi/status/688142936731549702[/tweet]
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
User avatar
Santoki
General Manager
Posts: 7,813
And1: 2,635
Joined: Feb 16, 2007
Location: Toronto
   

Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements 

Post#31 » by Santoki » Fri Jan 15, 2016 11:50 pm

Take Delabar's $350K raise and give it to Donaldson. Come on FO.
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 34,089
And1: 19,318
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements 

Post#32 » by Randle McMurphy » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:10 am

You guys realize they weren't actually haggling over 450K with Donaldson, right? Both parties would have changed their offers for the actual filing to give a better chance of winning.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 34,089
And1: 19,318
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements 

Post#33 » by Randle McMurphy » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:15 am

dagger wrote:Yea, kind of dumb considering some of the big gaps out there - Moustakas, Arrieta, etc. Seems like an odd hill for management to die on.

A raise now leads to a bigger raise in the future. This would be about saving those multi millions down the road.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
dagger
RealGM
Posts: 40,577
And1: 13,498
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements 

Post#34 » by dagger » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:56 am

Randle McMurphy wrote:
dagger wrote:Yea, kind of dumb considering some of the big gaps out there - Moustakas, Arrieta, etc. Seems like an odd hill for management to die on.

A raise now leads to a bigger raise in the future. This would be about saving those multi millions down the road.


You won;t have a multi-,million variance based on such a small gap now.
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 34,089
And1: 19,318
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements 

Post#35 » by Randle McMurphy » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:59 am

dagger wrote:
Randle McMurphy wrote:
dagger wrote:Yea, kind of dumb considering some of the big gaps out there - Moustakas, Arrieta, etc. Seems like an odd hill for management to die on.

A raise now leads to a bigger raise in the future. This would be about saving those multi millions down the road.


You won;t have a multi-,million variance based on such a small gap now.

By 2018, his last year of arbitration, I believe it would be. In any case, the difference today adds up to considerably more down the road for him. Should the Jays just be giving him that money out of kindness?
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
User avatar
binjumper
Starter
Posts: 2,481
And1: 3,695
Joined: Oct 02, 2009
       

Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements 

Post#36 » by binjumper » Sat Jan 16, 2016 1:22 am

he's the mvp pay the man
Image
User avatar
C Court
RealGM
Posts: 38,551
And1: 25,111
Joined: Nov 07, 2005
Location: Toronto
       

Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements 

Post#37 » by C Court » Sat Jan 16, 2016 1:35 am

Randle McMurphy wrote:You guys realize they weren't actually haggling over 450K with Donaldson, right? Both parties would have changed their offers for the actual filing to give a better chance of winning.


Yup. That's how I understand it works.

Donaldson's camp may have been talking say $12.5 million while the Jays were offering $10.5 million - a gap of $2 million (as an example).

Once the deadline hits, then both sides put their 'realistic' numbers on the table. In this case, they both filed numbers which are less than $500k apart. But neither side knew what the other side's number was until after the filing.
NBA Champion Toronto Raptors
User avatar
Santoki
General Manager
Posts: 7,813
And1: 2,635
Joined: Feb 16, 2007
Location: Toronto
   

Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements 

Post#38 » by Santoki » Sat Jan 16, 2016 2:16 am

Centre Court wrote:
Randle McMurphy wrote:You guys realize they weren't actually haggling over 450K with Donaldson, right? Both parties would have changed their offers for the actual filing to give a better chance of winning.


Yup. That's how I understand it works.

Donaldson's camp may have been talking say $12.5 million while the Jays were offering $10.5 million - a gap of $2 million (as an example).

Once the deadline hits, then both sides put their 'realistic' numbers on the table. In this case, they both filed numbers which are less than $500k apart. But neither side knew what the other side's number was until after the filing.


Once they know the filed number what stops them from avoiding the whole thing and just giving him the $450K?

And why would both sides put realistic numbers out in arb? Wouldn't it benefit both to have the negotiated numbers and let the arbritator decide what's fair.
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 34,089
And1: 19,318
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements 

Post#39 » by Randle McMurphy » Sat Jan 16, 2016 2:36 am

Santoki wrote:
Centre Court wrote:
Randle McMurphy wrote:You guys realize they weren't actually haggling over 450K with Donaldson, right? Both parties would have changed their offers for the actual filing to give a better chance of winning.


Yup. That's how I understand it works.

Donaldson's camp may have been talking say $12.5 million while the Jays were offering $10.5 million - a gap of $2 million (as an example).

Once the deadline hits, then both sides put their 'realistic' numbers on the table. In this case, they both filed numbers which are less than $500k apart. But neither side knew what the other side's number was until after the filing.


Once they know the filed number what stops them from avoiding the whole thing and just giving him the $450K?

Nothing other than their own policy. But if you create an exception for him, it kind of defeats the entire purpose of it.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 57,410
And1: 17,097
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements 

Post#40 » by Schad » Sat Jan 16, 2016 3:08 am

Also, both sides now have a pretty good idea of what Donaldson can expect coming off an MVP season, but without having locked in on a 2016 salary. Beneficial if there's any possibility of an extension, though I don't know that such is even remotely likely.
Image
**** your asterisk.

Return to Toronto Blue Jays