Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
Moderator: JaysRule15
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
- Rhettmatic
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 21,081
- And1: 14,547
- Joined: Jul 23, 2006
- Location: Toronto
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
[tweet]https://twitter.com/bnicholsonsmith/status/688120859689537536[/tweet]
Sig by the one and only Turbo_Zone.
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
- Jays4WS
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 879
- And1: 1,415
- Joined: Jul 03, 2015
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
We didn't agree with Donaldson over 450k.
Good job Ownership.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Good job Ownership.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 40,577
- And1: 13,498
- Joined: Aug 19, 2002
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
Yea, kind of dumb considering some of the big gaps out there - Moustakas, Arrieta, etc. Seems like an odd hill for management to die on.
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
- bluerap23
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,399
- And1: 6,574
- Joined: Aug 15, 2012
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
Cecil gets 400K more than expected, Hutch gets 400K less.
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
- bluerap23
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,399
- And1: 6,574
- Joined: Aug 15, 2012
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
SharoneWright wrote:dagger wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/ShiDavidi/status/688059273788678144[/tweet]
Nats gonna sign Revere for 8.376M just for kicks.
Seriously, I'd rather Shapiro was in on that arb case than Rizzo... seems odd.
Stoeren was expected to get 8.8 so I hope not.
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
- bluerap23
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,399
- And1: 6,574
- Joined: Aug 15, 2012
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
The Nationals have struck a one-year deal with just-acquired outfielder Ben Revere for $6.25MM, Jon Heyman tweets. Revere had been projected by MLBTR to earn a $6.7MM salary next year.
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/ben-revere
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,007
- And1: 2,854
- Joined: Jul 16, 2009
- Location: Toronto, ON
- Contact:
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
Very odd logic for an ownership/GM who gave Saunders a $250k raise... You gotta give Donaldson the extra $450k to make the best player on the team and MVP happy, especially when that salary isn't unreasonable for a player with that pedigree... What arbitrator isn't going to be in favour of honouring Donaldson's salary arb request? #stupidmovejays
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,180
- And1: 1,699
- Joined: Feb 08, 2004
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
Stupid move on Donaldson.
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
- changes
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,800
- And1: 9,124
- Joined: Dec 08, 2012
- Location: Vancouver
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
Rhettmatic wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/bnicholsonsmith/status/688120859689537536[/tweet]
Unbelievable lol.
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 40,577
- And1: 13,498
- Joined: Aug 19, 2002
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
[tweet]https://twitter.com/ShiDavidi/status/688142129357406208[/tweet]
[tweet]https://twitter.com/ShiDavidi/status/688142936731549702[/tweet]
[tweet]https://twitter.com/ShiDavidi/status/688142936731549702[/tweet]
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
- Santoki
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,813
- And1: 2,635
- Joined: Feb 16, 2007
- Location: Toronto
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
Take Delabar's $350K raise and give it to Donaldson. Come on FO.
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,089
- And1: 19,318
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
You guys realize they weren't actually haggling over 450K with Donaldson, right? Both parties would have changed their offers for the actual filing to give a better chance of winning.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,089
- And1: 19,318
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
dagger wrote:Yea, kind of dumb considering some of the big gaps out there - Moustakas, Arrieta, etc. Seems like an odd hill for management to die on.
A raise now leads to a bigger raise in the future. This would be about saving those multi millions down the road.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 40,577
- And1: 13,498
- Joined: Aug 19, 2002
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
Randle McMurphy wrote:dagger wrote:Yea, kind of dumb considering some of the big gaps out there - Moustakas, Arrieta, etc. Seems like an odd hill for management to die on.
A raise now leads to a bigger raise in the future. This would be about saving those multi millions down the road.
You won;t have a multi-,million variance based on such a small gap now.
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,089
- And1: 19,318
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
dagger wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:dagger wrote:Yea, kind of dumb considering some of the big gaps out there - Moustakas, Arrieta, etc. Seems like an odd hill for management to die on.
A raise now leads to a bigger raise in the future. This would be about saving those multi millions down the road.
You won;t have a multi-,million variance based on such a small gap now.
By 2018, his last year of arbitration, I believe it would be. In any case, the difference today adds up to considerably more down the road for him. Should the Jays just be giving him that money out of kindness?
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
- binjumper
- Starter
- Posts: 2,481
- And1: 3,695
- Joined: Oct 02, 2009
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
he's the mvp pay the man
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
- C Court
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,551
- And1: 25,111
- Joined: Nov 07, 2005
- Location: Toronto
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
Randle McMurphy wrote:You guys realize they weren't actually haggling over 450K with Donaldson, right? Both parties would have changed their offers for the actual filing to give a better chance of winning.
Yup. That's how I understand it works.
Donaldson's camp may have been talking say $12.5 million while the Jays were offering $10.5 million - a gap of $2 million (as an example).
Once the deadline hits, then both sides put their 'realistic' numbers on the table. In this case, they both filed numbers which are less than $500k apart. But neither side knew what the other side's number was until after the filing.
NBA Champion Toronto Raptors
Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
- Santoki
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,813
- And1: 2,635
- Joined: Feb 16, 2007
- Location: Toronto
Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
Centre Court wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:You guys realize they weren't actually haggling over 450K with Donaldson, right? Both parties would have changed their offers for the actual filing to give a better chance of winning.
Yup. That's how I understand it works.
Donaldson's camp may have been talking say $12.5 million while the Jays were offering $10.5 million - a gap of $2 million (as an example).
Once the deadline hits, then both sides put their 'realistic' numbers on the table. In this case, they both filed numbers which are less than $500k apart. But neither side knew what the other side's number was until after the filing.
Once they know the filed number what stops them from avoiding the whole thing and just giving him the $450K?
And why would both sides put realistic numbers out in arb? Wouldn't it benefit both to have the negotiated numbers and let the arbritator decide what's fair.
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,089
- And1: 19,318
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
Santoki wrote:Centre Court wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:You guys realize they weren't actually haggling over 450K with Donaldson, right? Both parties would have changed their offers for the actual filing to give a better chance of winning.
Yup. That's how I understand it works.
Donaldson's camp may have been talking say $12.5 million while the Jays were offering $10.5 million - a gap of $2 million (as an example).
Once the deadline hits, then both sides put their 'realistic' numbers on the table. In this case, they both filed numbers which are less than $500k apart. But neither side knew what the other side's number was until after the filing.
Once they know the filed number what stops them from avoiding the whole thing and just giving him the $450K?
Nothing other than their own policy. But if you create an exception for him, it kind of defeats the entire purpose of it.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
- Schad
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 57,410
- And1: 17,097
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: The Goat Rodeo
Re: Jays' arbitration decisions and settlements
Also, both sides now have a pretty good idea of what Donaldson can expect coming off an MVP season, but without having locked in on a 2016 salary. Beneficial if there's any possibility of an extension, though I don't know that such is even remotely likely.
**** your asterisk.