RealGM

Cactus Jack wrote:

durden_tyler wrote:

Cactus Jack wrote:Lol you're just worried because you're on the bubble. I'll change it to 7. Since that's the format we had last season.

Of course am worried, been working hard for this stretch and you try to cheat me out of it? LOL

And it’s not just about me, it’s about the little guys (the bottom four) who thought we had a chance but you cheat us out of that chance? LOL

Oh please...I remember you complaining that eight was too many earlier lol.

Of course, i assumed it was a competitive league so was glad with eight considering the start i had, i needed it.

But changing the rules midstream? That’s cheating.

i’d like to hear what the other managers think of this change. LOL

...

Cactus Jack wrote:

durden_tyler wrote:You can’t change league rules by midseason (actually 4 weeks left) that’s just not fair for all.

It's set for seven. So no change from last year. The bottom three teams have a losing record at the moment. You have to earn it!

No that was not the original setting at the start of the season. It was at 8. Any change in freaking Week 10 is cheating.

durden_tyler wrote:No that was not the original setting at the start of the season. It was at 8. Any change in freaking Week 10 is cheating.

You want me to set it up so that everyone makes it?

Cactus Jack wrote:

durden_tyler wrote:No that was not the original setting at the start of the season. It was at 8. Any change in freaking Week 10 is cheating.

You want me to set it up so that everyone makes it?

LOL. If you want to cheat, then go ahead but am not tolerating this. Either you are a cheater or just a bad commissioner i guess— who changes rules in Week 10 of 14 week regular season?!

durden_tyler wrote:

Cactus Jack wrote:

durden_tyler wrote:No that was not the original setting at the start of the season. It was at 8. Any change in freaking Week 10 is cheating.

You want me to set it up so that everyone makes it?

LOL. If you want to cheat, then go ahead but am not tolerating this. Either you are a cheater or just a bad commissioner i guess— who changes rules in Week 10 of 14 week regular season?!

Fwiw I'm just giving you a hard time. I set it to 6. Because I knew it would piss you off.

I did actually change it back.

Cactus Jack wrote:

durden_tyler wrote:

Cactus Jack wrote:You want me to set it up so that everyone makes it?

LOL. If you want to cheat, then go ahead but am not tolerating this. Either you are a cheater or just a bad commissioner i guess— who changes rules in Week 10 of 14 week regular season?!

Fwiw I'm just giving you a hard time. I set it to 6. Because I knew it would piss you off.

I did actually change it back.

LOL. Thanks for admitting your mistake.

durden_tyler wrote:LOL. Thanks for admitting your mistake.

lol you made a joke that 8 was too many back in August. You wanted me to change it then. So what changed?

Im personally against playoffs entirely. I prefer roto style of points used to determine the season long winner. Or if anything, have one championship game at the end of the “season” where the top 2 teams play each other.

This is my last year of fantasy anyways

azcatz11 wrote:Im personally against playoffs entirely. I prefer roto style of points used to determine the season long winner. Or if anything, have one championship game at the end of the “season” where the top 2 teams play each other.

This is my last year of fantasy anyways

I don't blame you.

bluejerseyjinx wrote:

azcatz11 wrote:Im personally against playoffs entirely. I prefer roto style of points used to determine the season long winner. Or if anything, have one championship game at the end of the “season” where the top 2 teams play each other.

This is my last year of fantasy anyways

I don't blame you.

Has nothing to do with this league. I prefer to watch games in the pure form going forward. I still may stay in this league but I’m undecided. In my dynasty league I’m finished

azcatz11 wrote:

bluejerseyjinx wrote:

azcatz11 wrote:Im personally against playoffs entirely. I prefer roto style of points used to determine the season long winner. Or if anything, have one championship game at the end of the “season” where the top 2 teams play each other.

This is my last year of fantasy anyways

I don't blame you.

Has nothing to do with this league. I prefer to watch games in the pure form going forward. I still may stay in this league but I’m undecided. In my dynasty league I’m finished

I'm thinking of retirement also. Due to lack of competition.

azcatz11 wrote:Im personally against playoffs entirely. I prefer roto style of points used to determine the season long winner. Or if anything, have one championship game at the end of the “season” where the top 2 teams play each other.

This is my last year of fantasy anyways

Looks like another W for you this week.

azcatz11 wrote:Im personally against playoffs entirely. I prefer roto style of points used to determine the season long winner. Or if anything, have one championship game at the end of the “season” where the top 2 teams play each other.

This is my last year of fantasy anyways

Mention that next August and see how many sign up for that type of league.

Cactus Jack wrote:

azcatz11 wrote:Im personally against playoffs entirely. I prefer roto style of points used to determine the season long winner. Or if anything, have one championship game at the end of the “season” where the top 2 teams play each other.

This is my last year of fantasy anyways

Looks like another W for you this week.

He's just upset because I own him.

bluejerseyjinx wrote:

azcatz11 wrote:Im personally against playoffs entirely. I prefer roto style of points used to determine the season long winner. Or if anything, have one championship game at the end of the “season” where the top 2 teams play each other.

This is my last year of fantasy anyways

Mention that next August and see how many sign up for that type of league.

I’ll accept that offer you made to me if you make it again

azcatz11 wrote:

bluejerseyjinx wrote:

azcatz11 wrote:Im personally against playoffs entirely. I prefer roto style of points used to determine the season long winner. Or if anything, have one championship game at the end of the “season” where the top 2 teams play each other.

This is my last year of fantasy anyways

Mention that next August and see how many sign up for that type of league.

I’ll accept that offer you made to me if you make it again

Needing a loan?

azcatz11 wrote:

bluejerseyjinx wrote:

azcatz11 wrote:Im personally against playoffs entirely. I prefer roto style of points used to determine the season long winner. Or if anything, have one championship game at the end of the “season” where the top 2 teams play each other.

This is my last year of fantasy anyways

Mention that next August and see how many sign up for that type of league.

I’ll accept that offer you made to me if you make it again

OOHH, you mean that trade offer?

bluejerseyjinx wrote:OOHH, you mean that trade offer?

Goff is still available.

azcatz11 wrote:Im personally against playoffs entirely. I prefer roto style of points used to determine the season long winner. Or if anything, have one championship game at the end of the “season” where the top 2 teams play each other.

This is my last year of fantasy anyways

You should host a fantasy party at your house in February!!!!