Free Agency 2017

Moderators: bwgood77, Icness

User avatar
Otis Driftwood
Starter
Posts: 2,483
And1: 656
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
       

Re: Free Agency 2017 

Post#261 » by Otis Driftwood » Fri Mar 17, 2017 2:26 pm

shawn_hemp wrote:Wow I didn't even know the Bears signed Mike Glennon

Image

Chicago has to get consideration as being a possible worst team in the league this year right?

I could see Cleveland or SF again, but Chicago is pretty atrocious as well


I think you underestimate the Jets...
31 Unanswered Points
User avatar
The Regime
RealGM
Posts: 13,707
And1: 1,709
Joined: Feb 04, 2011
   

Re: Free Agency 2017 

Post#262 » by The Regime » Sat Mar 18, 2017 6:14 pm

Latavius is an idiot. If I were in his shoes I would have taken a paycut and stuck around in Oakland.
bluejerseyjinx
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,924
And1: 497
Joined: Oct 18, 2014
     

Re: Free Agency 2017 

Post#263 » by bluejerseyjinx » Sun Mar 19, 2017 4:04 pm

Otis Driftwood wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
Otis Driftwood wrote:Mo Claiborne turns down $5M from Jags - asks for $7.5M

He scored a 6 on his Wonderlic.

Saw you resigned McFadden. Liked him coming out. But dude is so fragile. Must handle with care. :wink:


As long as he isn't overworked, he's fine. He was really good when he came in to spell Zeke last year once he got healthy.

Meanwhile, Carr took that deal with the Ravens. Claiborne went to the Jets.

Did I mention somewhere - Claiborne scored a 6 on his Wonderlic...

I bet that is higher than Jwise and the whole Texans organization put together, :lol:
Ballerhogger
RealGM
Posts: 11,268
And1: 2,156
Joined: Jul 06, 2014
       

Re: Free Agency 2017 

Post#264 » by Ballerhogger » Tue Mar 21, 2017 7:24 am

EJ Manuel could be a good back up QB for the raiders.
User avatar
bleu
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 6,063
And1: 957
Joined: Apr 24, 2007
       

Re: Free Agency 2017 

Post#265 » by bleu » Tue Mar 21, 2017 5:02 pm

Ballerhogger wrote:EJ Manuel could be a good back up QB for the raiders.


Agreed. I'm surprised Manuel's name hasn't been thrown around a little bit more this offseason. Not that he's a spectacular QB or anything, but with how thin many teams are at the position, I would think he's a pretty solid backup.
bsjaffe6
Freshman
Posts: 59
And1: 8
Joined: Jan 28, 2017
         

Re: Free Agency 2017 

Post#266 » by bsjaffe6 » Tue Mar 21, 2017 7:40 pm

i think the Jets could easily go 1-15 boy that team is in disarray
yeah Manuel will be good in Oakland
User avatar
BucksPackers
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,625
And1: 280
Joined: Jun 23, 2016
   

Re: Free Agency 2017 

Post#267 » by BucksPackers » Tue Mar 21, 2017 8:40 pm

Where will these guys end up:

Jamal Charles-
AP-
Blount-
Lynch-
Zach Brown
Revis-

I ask because as a packers fan I am interested in some of these guys since we need defensive help and need a RB.
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Head Coach
Posts: 6,598
And1: 2,580
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
     

Re: Free Agency 2017 

Post#268 » by Cactus Jack » Tue Mar 21, 2017 9:11 pm

BucksPackers wrote:Where will these guys end up:

Jamal Charles-
AP-
Blount-
Lynch-
Zach Brown
Revis-

I ask because as a packers fan I am interested in some of these guys since we need defensive help and need a RB.

Beastmode will be a Raider this fall, sadly. :cry:

Charles could end up in GB. But, I think he's done & wouldn't touch him. Would be a bad signing. Dude just can't stay healthy.

AP? No idea. He should call it quits imo.

Blount goes back to NE.

Revis to a contender. Maybe NE.
Seattle Supersonics / Warriors (7/4/16)
User avatar
BucksPackers
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,625
And1: 280
Joined: Jun 23, 2016
   

Re: Free Agency 2017 

Post#269 » by BucksPackers » Tue Mar 21, 2017 9:15 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:
BucksPackers wrote:Where will these guys end up:

Jamal Charles-
AP-
Blount-
Lynch-
Zach Brown
Revis-

I ask because as a packers fan I am interested in some of these guys since we need defensive help and need a RB.

Beastmode will be a Raider this fall, sadly. :cry:

Charles could end up in GB. But, I think he's done & wouldn't touch him. Would be a waste imho. Dude just can't stay healthy.

AP? No idea. He should call it quits imo.

Blount goes back to NE.

Revis to a contender. Maybe NE.



Brown?
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Head Coach
Posts: 6,598
And1: 2,580
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
     

Re: Free Agency 2017 

Post#270 » by Cactus Jack » Tue Mar 21, 2017 9:19 pm

BucksPackers wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
BucksPackers wrote:Where will these guys end up:

Jamal Charles-
AP-
Blount-
Lynch-
Zach Brown
Revis-

I ask because as a packers fan I am interested in some of these guys since we need defensive help and need a RB.

Beastmode will be a Raider this fall, sadly. :cry:

Charles could end up in GB. But, I think he's done & wouldn't touch him. Would be a waste imho. Dude just can't stay healthy.

AP? No idea. He should call it quits imo.

Blount goes back to NE.

Revis to a contender. Maybe NE.



Brown?

Does it matter? :lol:
Seattle Supersonics / Warriors (7/4/16)
User avatar
BucksPackers
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,625
And1: 280
Joined: Jun 23, 2016
   

Re: Free Agency 2017 

Post#271 » by BucksPackers » Tue Mar 21, 2017 9:21 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:
BucksPackers wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:Beastmode will be a Raider this fall, sadly. :cry:

Charles could end up in GB. But, I think he's done & wouldn't touch him. Would be a waste imho. Dude just can't stay healthy.

AP? No idea. He should call it quits imo.

Blount goes back to NE.

Revis to a contender. Maybe NE.



Brown?

Does it matter? :lol:



Sadly it does when our offense puts up 40 points and our defense gives up 42 points. :banghead:
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Head Coach
Posts: 6,598
And1: 2,580
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
     

Re: Free Agency 2017 

Post#272 » by Cactus Jack » Tue Mar 21, 2017 9:25 pm

BucksPackers wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
BucksPackers wrote:

Brown?

Does it matter? :lol:



Sadly it does when our offense puts up 40 points and our defense gives up 42 points. :banghead:

The Packers should sign/pursue Blount. Forget AP/Charles. Avoid them. Revis would be a decent signing. But, he's not the same player either.
Seattle Supersonics / Warriors (7/4/16)
User avatar
BucksPackers
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,625
And1: 280
Joined: Jun 23, 2016
   

Re: Free Agency 2017 

Post#273 » by BucksPackers » Tue Mar 21, 2017 9:27 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:
BucksPackers wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:Does it matter? :lol:



Sadly it does when our offense puts up 40 points and our defense gives up 42 points. :banghead:

The Packers should sign/pursue Blount. Forget AP/Charles. Avoid them. Revis would be a decent signing. But, he's not the same player either.



I thought the same thing about Blount. Just a guy that can get us 3-4 yards when we need it. Montgomery will be good enough in the passing game.
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Head Coach
Posts: 6,598
And1: 2,580
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
     

Re: Free Agency 2017 

Post#274 » by Cactus Jack » Tue Mar 21, 2017 9:29 pm

BucksPackers wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
BucksPackers wrote:

Sadly it does when our offense puts up 40 points and our defense gives up 42 points. :banghead:

The Packers should sign/pursue Blount. Forget AP/Charles. Avoid them. Revis would be a decent signing. But, he's not the same player either.



I thought the same thing about Blount. Just a guy that can get us 3-4 yards when we need it. Montgomery will be good enough in the passing game.

Blount is the closest thing to Lacy without the weight issues. GB would be smart to pick him up.
Seattle Supersonics / Warriors (7/4/16)
User avatar
BucksPackers
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,625
And1: 280
Joined: Jun 23, 2016
   

Re: Free Agency 2017 

Post#275 » by BucksPackers » Tue Mar 21, 2017 9:35 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:
BucksPackers wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:The Packers should sign/pursue Blount. Forget AP/Charles. Avoid them. Revis would be a decent signing. But, he's not the same player either.



I thought the same thing about Blount. Just a guy that can get us 3-4 yards when we need it. Montgomery will be good enough in the passing game.

Blount is the closest thing to Lacy without the weight issues. GB would be smart to pick him up.



I was thinking maybe DeAngello Williams too. He did well for Bell when he was out.
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Head Coach
Posts: 6,598
And1: 2,580
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
     

Re: Free Agency 2017 

Post#276 » by Cactus Jack » Tue Mar 21, 2017 9:40 pm

BucksPackers wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
BucksPackers wrote:

I thought the same thing about Blount. Just a guy that can get us 3-4 yards when we need it. Montgomery will be good enough in the passing game.

Blount is the closest thing to Lacy without the weight issues. GB would be smart to pick him up.



I was thinking maybe DeAngello Williams too. He did well for Bell when he was out.

Maybe. He's gonna be 34. Montgomery looked really good down the stretch. Like him a lot. Christine Michael is what he is. Garbage time player lol.
Seattle Supersonics / Warriors (7/4/16)
User avatar
BucksPackers
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,625
And1: 280
Joined: Jun 23, 2016
   

Re: Free Agency 2017 

Post#277 » by BucksPackers » Tue Mar 21, 2017 9:43 pm

Cactus Jack wrote:
BucksPackers wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:Blount is the closest thing to Lacy without the weight issues. GB would be smart to pick him up.



I was thinking maybe DeAngello Williams too. He did well for Bell when he was out.

Maybe. He's gonna be 34. Montgomery looked really good down the stretch. Like him a lot. Christine Michael is what he is. Garbage time player lol.



Were any of the rumors true that Seattle was looking to move Sherman?
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Head Coach
Posts: 6,598
And1: 2,580
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
     

Re: Free Agency 2017 

Post#278 » by Cactus Jack » Tue Mar 21, 2017 9:46 pm

BucksPackers wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
BucksPackers wrote:

I was thinking maybe DeAngello Williams too. He did well for Bell when he was out.

Maybe. He's gonna be 34. Montgomery looked really good down the stretch. Like him a lot. Christine Michael is what he is. Garbage time player lol.



Were any of the rumors true that Seattle was looking to move Sherman?

No. Just made up speculation. Our other CB's suck for the most part. Shead is coming off an ACL/MCL. Very little depth. I Expect them to draft a CB or two.
Seattle Supersonics / Warriors (7/4/16)
User avatar
rickrolled
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,835
And1: 1,449
Joined: Nov 12, 2011
     

Re: Free Agency 2017 

Post#279 » by rickrolled » Wed Mar 22, 2017 12:40 am

Was a report last week the Raiders inquired about Sherman, or was it the seahawks listening to offers.....?

Anyways if the Raiders get both him and Lynch it would be a helluva AFC title game with the Patriots.
Image
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Head Coach
Posts: 6,598
And1: 2,580
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
     

Re: Free Agency 2017 

Post#280 » by Cactus Jack » Wed Mar 22, 2017 1:16 am

rickrolled wrote:Was a report last week the Raiders inquired about Sherman, or was it the seahawks listening to offers.....?

Anyways if the Raiders get both him and Lynch it would be a helluva AFC title game with the Patriots.

Sherm isn't going to be traded. That wasn't a report. Just a guy talking out of his ***. Not a real thing. Plus, it would take a massive offer (like a 1st & a 2nd/3rd).
Seattle Supersonics / Warriors (7/4/16)

Return to The General NFL Board