8 posts • Page 1 of 1
- Posts: 1
- And1: 0
- Joined: Nov 09, 2013
I have a co worker who is from Philadelphia and he told me that Nick Foles is a better quarterback than Peyton Manning. He said that both Manning and Foles were the first quarterbacks in 50 years to throw for 7 touchdowns and zero interceptions. Ecept that it took Manning 16 years to accomplish this feat and it took Foles only 2 years to accomplish it. He feels that Foles is the real deal and that will eventually be a better quarterback than Manning. I seriously think that my co worker has some kind of head trauma. What does everyone else think?
- Arda K
- Posts: 47,956
- And1: 18,741
- Joined: Apr 11, 2007
- Location: Frisco
foles has a better record in playoffs, your co worker is clearly right
TheLowlySquire wrote:Wow, Arda! Huge!
Howard Mass wrote:Arda is not a terrorist. Arda is a good person.
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 27,668
- And1: 439
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
- Location: Warriors - Niners - Skins - Stanford - SF Giants
Is it theoretically possible that Nick Foles will have a better career than Peyton Manning? Yes. It's about as likely as Andy Reid becoming an underwear model, though.
- Banned User
- Posts: 422
- And1: 81
- Joined: Aug 16, 2014
Charger 4 Life wrote:He said that both Manning and Foles were the first quarterbacks in 50 years to throw for 7 touchdowns and zero interceptions. Ecept that it took Manning 16 years to accomplish this feat and it took Foles only 2 years to accomplish it.
That's pretty poor reasoning. Manning's resume speaks for itself, regardless of timeline.
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 807
- And1: 68
- Joined: Jun 02, 2016
Cactus Jack wrote:ErnieDiGregorio wrote:I hope this place is more active than this thread shows...?
It ain't. Foles was just released.
I think I meant the whole section,not just thread.
I forgot I was here because the thread title is so weird