yardbarker

Bulger vs Brady

Moderator: NO-KG-AI

Postby bigboy1234 on Tue Jul 31, 2007 5:42 pm

Who's underappreicating Brees? I said he was better than Bulger.
Brees had more yards, TD's on less passes, and a better completion %

Yet that Bulger guy had a higher DPAR, which I would take over any of that. Brees also had more INT on less passes and only finished 1 % point higher than Bulger in completion %, not that much of a difference.
and his arm wasn't even fully recovered until week 3, which made passing a challenge for us, and those two interceptions in those games came because when he went to air it out, he couldn't get anything behind his throws.

And this matters why? Don't blame Bulger for that, I was simple stating theres no way Brees had a better season last year.
Colston played 12 games, and Horn played 10, while the rams duo played a full 16.

Which makes it sad that the Saints trio was still better huh. Just imagine if they played all 16 games then they would have been far and away better.
completely new offensive line

Yet, his pass protection was a lot better than Bulgers.
Add to that he only threw 5 passes in the final game, because we had the spot locked up.

Yay, for him.
Bulger is not with those guys.

I would take those guys over Bulger, but last year he was the 2nd best overall QB in the game, which earns him a spot in the conversation. I also think McNabb is the 2nd tier and maybe Rivers.
User avatar
bigboy1234
Assistant Coach
 
Posts: 4106
And1: 4
Joined: May 28, 2006

Postby NO-KG-AI on Tue Jul 31, 2007 6:38 pm

bigboy1234 wrote:Who's underappreicating Brees? I said he was better than Bulger.
Brees had more yards, TD's on less passes, and a better completion %

Yet that Bulger guy had a higher DPAR, which I would take over any of that. Brees also had more INT on less passes and only finished 1 % point higher than Bulger in completion %, not that much of a difference.
and his arm wasn't even fully recovered until week 3, which made passing a challenge for us, and those two interceptions in those games came because when he went to air it out, he couldn't get anything behind his throws.

And this matters why? Don't blame Bulger for that, I was simple stating theres no way Brees had a better season last year.
Colston played 12 games, and Horn played 10, while the rams duo played a full 16.

Which makes it sad that the Saints trio was still better huh. Just imagine if they played all 16 games then they would have been far and away better.
completely new offensive line

Yet, his pass protection was a lot better than Bulgers.
Add to that he only threw 5 passes in the final game, because we had the spot locked up.

Yay, for him.
Bulger is not with those guys.

I would take those guys over Bulger, but last year he was the 2nd best overall QB in the game, which earns him a spot in the conversation. I also think McNabb is the 2nd tier and maybe Rivers.


I agree with Mcnabb being there, but I wasn't even going to get into that right now, so I just picked the guys I thought was clearly better.

I dunno, Brees might have clouded my judgment a lot when he threw for 500+ with Devery henderson and Terrence Copper as his 1/2 punch....
rrravenred wrote:Stick that in your superior advanced-calculus pipe, and smoke it, you stat-headed Garnett stan...


http://www.spinitreacts.com/
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Global Mod
 
Posts: 29661
And1: 26
Joined: Jul 18, 2005
Location: The lost city of New Orleans

Postby Basketball Jesus on Sun Aug 05, 2007 9:34 am

The_Child_Prodigy wrote:Since the Pats lost Willie McGinest they have not reached the SB, he was a big reason for there success.


This may be one of the stupidest things ever written anywhere on RealGM.

McGinest has only been away from New England for one season...a season in which the Pats were one half-game meltdown away from making the Super Bowl.

The Curse of Willie!
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
 
Posts: 31180
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 4, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

Postby onopatrick14 on Mon Aug 06, 2007 8:10 pm

Manning is #1 without a doubt
2-4 is Palmer, Brady, Brees in any order.
In my opinion the 5 spot is a tossup between McNabb (when healthy) and Bulger
onopatrick14
Sophomore
 
Posts: 127
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 1, 2006

Postby kooldude on Sun Aug 12, 2007 4:21 pm

McNabb over Bulger
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.


Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
User avatar
kooldude
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 4707
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 7, 2007

Postby The_Child_Prodigy on Tue Aug 14, 2007 11:48 pm

kooldude wrote:McNabb over Bulger


Not in my opinion.

When Bulger shines again and the Pats dont make the superbowl again we will se what happens.
User avatar
The_Child_Prodigy
Analyst
 
Posts: 3396
And1: 0
Joined: May 3, 2005

Postby Monkeyfeng06 on Wed Aug 15, 2007 12:39 am

kooldude wrote:McNabb over Bulger


mcnabb's constant injuries are pissing me off.
Monkeyfeng06
RealGM
 
Posts: 19811
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 19, 2005

Postby High 5 on Wed Aug 15, 2007 6:43 am

The_Child_Prodigy wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Not in my opinion.

When Bulger shines again and the Pats dont make the superbowl again we will se what happens.


When Buldger shines again by missing the playoffs and Brady loses in the 2nd half of the AFC Championship game, the debate will somehow shift in your favor?
User avatar
High 5
RealGM
 
Posts: 12637
And1: 22
Joined: Apr 20, 2006

Postby PistonFan4Life on Wed Aug 15, 2007 10:25 pm

The_Child_Prodigy wrote:Not in my opinion.

When Bulger shines again and the Pats dont make the superbowl again we will se what happens.

Until you are willing to admit that Bulger isn't anywhere near on the level of Brady then I don't think anyone cares too much about your opinion. All 5 QBs that have been named are better that Bulger by a mile and I'm sure more could be named. Bulger isn't terrible, but he only looks so good because of the WRs that he can throw to and the fact that teams have to respect Jackson at RB takes some more pressure off of Bulger.
User avatar
PistonFan4Life
Rookie
 
Posts: 1223
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 2, 2001
Location: We need you boys back.

Postby kooldude on Thu Aug 16, 2007 10:45 am

The_Child_Prodigy wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Not in my opinion.

When Bulger shines again and the Pats dont make the superbowl again we will se what happens.


healthy McNabb over Bulger*
User avatar
kooldude
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 4707
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 7, 2007

Postby Monkeyfeng06 on Thu Aug 16, 2007 10:52 am

kooldude wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



healthy McNabb
over Bulger*


oxymoron.
Monkeyfeng06
RealGM
 
Posts: 19811
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 19, 2005

Postby FakeScreenName123 on Mon Aug 20, 2007 9:26 am

wow @ this thread.

someone's been playing madden too much lately.


stop posting, thread maker.
User avatar
FakeScreenName123
RealGM
 
Posts: 10746
And1: 17
Joined: Jul 9, 2003
Location: Town

Re: Bulger vs Brady

Postby Dirty Water on Tue Oct 02, 2007 8:58 am

The_Child_Prodigy wrote:I know most of you think Brady is a way better QB but compare the regular season numbers. Bulger beats him in basically every stat.

You are going to say but who has won 3 super-bowls and 2 SB MVPs? Well who has consistently had the better defense or the clutchest kicker ever?

Bulger is the better QB more accurate Brady is almost as good but has a great defense to fall back on.



This post is almost laughable.
User avatar
Dirty Water
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 5773
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 28, 2005
Location: The future

Postby CBS7 on Tue Oct 02, 2007 11:30 am

First time I saw this thread.
Wow.

Bulger through 4: 765 yards (191 yards/game) 2 TDs 4 INT 64.9 QB Rating 55.6%
Brady through 4: 1118 yards (278 yards/game) 13 TDs 3 INT 134.7 QB rating 79.2%

Yeah, Bulger has been hurt and his OL has had injuries, but he wouldn't be putting up near Brady's numbers even if he and his O-Line were healthy.

Look how Brady is doing with great WRs.
User avatar
CBS7
Retired Mod
 
Posts: 23207
And1: 4
Joined: Jan 20, 2005
Location: Dallas

Postby GregB on Sun Oct 07, 2007 3:41 pm

What a great bump. LOL at the OP.
User avatar
GregB
General Manager
 
Posts: 8413
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 20, 2004
Location: South Shore, MA

PreviousNext

Return to Player Comparisons

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users