hermes wrote:jeff,
there has been some rumors (who knows how serious they are) about some teams moving up to get tannehill since the other two qbs are going 1 and 2. who would likely be the ones to move up and where would they have to go to get him, #3? and will the vikings listen seriously to these trade talks- knowing kalil probably won't be there if they move down
I'll answer this backwards:
One of the most overplayed theories is that the Vikings are locked in on Kalil. Completely untrue speculation. They would love to have him but they love Claiborne just as much. And they really want an impact receiver too.
I'm actually doing a mock right now that has Miami trading up to #3. 8 to 3 is very doable. Seattle moving up is tougher because it changes the picks beyond the swap of #1s quite a bit, from two thirds (see: Marshall trade) and a 2 or 3 next year to a third this year and a 1 next year. Seattle could do that, not sure they would though.
It hinges on where Flynn goes. Miami allegedly lowballed him big-time with their initial meeting, and Seattle didn't even offer a deal. Of course Flynn's fate is tied to Manning, because if Manning doesn't go SF then the Niners are very much in the Flynn game. If Manning goes to SF then Flynn is really stuck, loses all leverage. At that point his best move is probably going back to Green Bay and accepting that nobody sees him as viable starter.
Anyways, that leaves the choice at risking Cleveland takes Tannehill at #4 (they're not even considering Flynn) or settling on Flynn or Chad Henne or Kyle Orton as the way to get a QB if you're Miami or Seattle or KC. Those are the only teams that can credibly need a 1st round QB. Buffalo could be a wild card because they have the luxury of letting him sit. If one of them really loves Tannehill--and they might--then I would expect them to be aggressive and go get him at #3.
FWIW I don't believe the Browns seriously want Tannehill at #4. If they fall back to #6 maybe, and that door is open, but not at #4.
FWIW #2--I would take Tannehill over Cassel or Locker or McCoy or Sanchez or Ponder, with the caveat that he not get rushed onto the field in 2012. If he proves ready then fine, but don't do to Tannehill what JAX did to Gabbert last year. Tannehill is every bit as good as Jay Cutler was when he came out. EVery damn bit as good.