Nate Robinson?

9abovetherim · Post #31 » by **9abovetherim** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 7:17 pm

Source says Nate Robinson will not be coming to the Warriors. Never discovered the other pieces, but that deal w/ Boston is not going down.

:lol:

Thank God.

Mylie10 · Post #32 » by **Mylie10** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 7:19 pm

Yeah just read that Ammick reported that Nate is NOT coming to the Warriors!

Whew! Bullet dodged.

GSForever · Post #33 » by **GSForever** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 7:19 pm

Id give KG a nice raise for 3 yrs to play C for us. If we don't get Perk, Oden or Yao. I love his leadership and toughess

turk3d · Post #34 » by **turk3d** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 7:20 pm

Allright!! One point for the Warrior FO.

Visigoth · Post #35 » by **Visigoth** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 7:20 pm

KevinMcreynolds wrote:
The Maestro wrote:Another midget for the backcourt?

We help NJ get D-Will and we help the Knicks get Melo and we all get is our own 2nd round pick back and an overpriced, soft pf who can't score or defend in the post.

Is there really any doubt left that I'm the biggest over dramatic cry baby on this message board?

Fixed.

This^

Maestro, how blind are you? We just took two teams out of playoff contention in the West. Riley's being brilliant right now.

Mylie10 · Post #36 » by **Mylie10** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 7:21 pm

WE (Riley) had nothing to do with it..Jeez..what are you his grandson?

Visigoth · Post #37 » by **Visigoth** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 7:22 pm

Tell that to Maestro, I'm just speaking on behalf of his assumption of what's happened.

turk3d · Post #38 » by **turk3d** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 7:23 pm

GSForever wrote:Id give KG a nice raise for 3 yrs to play C for us. If we don't get Perk, Oden or Yao. I love his leadership and toughess

I wanted him two years ago when he looked as though he was finished and Boston seemed maybe willing to dump him and the two year 40M remaining on his contract. I said I wanted him to play for us for the next year or two and mentor AR.

Of course I was laughed out loud for that one by most posters. I figured he had some juice left (not this much though) but I thought his leadership and winning approach was what was needed for this franchise. Now you're talking another 3 years. I'm afraid not with him coming off another all star season and Boston in the hunt for another ring.

Post #39 » by **FNQ** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 7:25 pm

biedrins for nate+exp filler would be fine with me.. Wed save 4.5m and the murphy trade/buyout would allow us the roster spots.

turk3d · Post #40 » by **turk3d** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 7:26 pm

Mylie's right. We had nothing to do with it. Nets made the deal without ours going through. Right now it's more or less luck working in our favor (for a change). Let's not hope Riley doesn't blow it (you know we do have a tendency to do that, we get a break and then we do something stupid to nullify it, see Maggette for example).

turk3d · Post #41 » by **turk3d** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 7:26 pm

FireNellieQuick wrote:biedrins for nate+exp filler would be fine with me.. Wed save 4.5m and the murphy trade/buyout would allow us the roster spots.

I'm sure it would.

Hopefully not with Lacob.

St.Nick · Post #42 » by **St.Nick** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 7:35 pm

FireNellieQuick wrote:biedrins for nate+exp filler would be fine with me.. Wed save 4.5m and the murphy trade/buyout would allow us the roster spots.

Boston doesn't touch that with a 100 foot pole.

Post #43 » by **FNQ** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 7:37 pm

Boston's backup big as is, is Erden.

Perkins has a history of knee issues.

Celtics arent worried about the tax.

St.Nick · Post #44 » by **St.Nick** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 7:40 pm

Biedrins sucks, though. The Celtics saw it first hand last night. And while they might not be worried about the tax, they can spend their money better than on Biedrins....and you know it

Mylie10 · Post #45 » by **Mylie10** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 7:45 pm

St.Nick wrote:Biedrins sucks, though. The Celtics saw it first hand last night. And while they might not be worried about the tax, they can spend their money better than on Biedrins....and you know it

Deleted

He had a good game. He played the front line tough and kept KG on the perimeter. Battled on the boards and blocked a Perkins point blank shot. Started the break with a big rebound.

Based on the play of all of our bigs, he and Udoh were the best. Udoh got scored on by Big Baby repeatedly, but they were tough shots for the most part.

While Beans was in there we were right in the mix. He came out in the first half with us down 3. He came out of the game in the third quarter down 1 I think. Never came back in...Smart went small and Celts took the lead. By the time everyone came back in, game was basically over.

Not sure why Smart didn't get back to Andris, because he was matching up well with the Celtic big men.

delsol650 · Post #46 » by **delsol650** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 8:52 pm

He played the front line tough and kept KG on the perimeter.

last time I checked KG was killing em both Inside and Out. :lol:

Post #47 » by **Sleepy51** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:01 pm

Mylie10 wrote:Not sure why Smart didn't get back to Andris, because he was matching up well with the Celtic big men.

Andris got himself yanked for not running with Monta on a fast break. We had a 3 on 2 where Dre was in the middle of the floor and was even with the ball. Monta was handling on his right. Obviously you don't want your big running the middle lane, but instead of getting himself over to a wing or even gettin ginto trail position, he just loafed it and stopped and watched. Monta missed the layup and our 7 foot "uptempo" Center was no where to be found for what would have been a pretty easy uncontested follow opportunity. In a game where our ability to get out and run was crucial, Biedrins chose not to run on a fastbreak opportunity. Smart was rightfully pissed at him and he was pulled for a long stretch. Hopefully Monta punches him in the face in practice today.

Then later in the game he got elbowed in the vagina.

Coxy · Post #48 » by **Coxy** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:08 pm

Oh for **** sake please let this dumb ass rumor die and quickly. Nate fuggin Robinson, really Riley and Lacob??? Really????

This better be bull ****

Post #49 » by **gswhoops** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:09 pm

Glad we're not getting him. Wouldn't really want him unless all we're giving up is Bell.

Coxy · Post #50 » by **Coxy** » Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:18 pm

gswhoops wrote:Glad we're not getting him. Wouldn't really want him unless all we're giving up is Bell.

I'd rather keep Bell quite frankly.