GSWhoopfan wrote:Twinkie defense wrote:GSWhoopfan wrote:Very little of Klays offensive is created by himself.
Who cares? Klay is long and has a beautiful, quick release. If you're loading balls into the JUGS machine and it's instantly spitting out perfect, fast spirals that exactly hit their target every time, who's creating the shot - you or the machine? The machine.
By obsessing about "shot creation" you seem to be expressing a bias for players who are going it alone, dribbling around. That's bad basketball. The offensive schemes, with players in motion, cutting, moving without the ball, with willing passers and a lot of ball movement, that is what will be creating open looks for Klay. And for Steph. I don't want Klay to be putting the ball on the floor too much, I want him to be using his brilliant stroke, raining down threes from all areas of the perimeter.
If you need to generate offense in your own...not every play...then you should be able to. He's a player that depends on others capabilities.
You don't think it would be nice if Klay got into the lane and kicked it out to Steph 4 times a game or more?
On the best teams (Championship teams), players have very clearly defined roles, and they kick ass in those roles. Period.
On mediocre and bad teams (Jazz), you have guys like Hayward playing way outside of their capabilities, away from their strengths, and your result is predictably garbage.
COULD Klay be our primary ball handler, drive, and average 5 assists per game? Yeah. But it'd make us a worse team and he'd suck at it, like Hayward.
Put Gordon on a team with a decent PG, he's a poor man's Klay Thompson averaging 3 APG.
You talk about Klay being a role player as if it's a bad thing when it's actually a good thing. You're arguing against yourself.