Twinkie defense wrote:Oftentimes Carrie has looked to be the more impactful rookie to Mack.
just, wow
Moderator: HMFFL
Twinkie defense wrote:Oftentimes Carrie has looked to be the more impactful rookie to Mack.
Pro Football Focus wrote:Khalil Mack, OLB: +7.1
Breakdown: Seems like we are praising Mack on a weekly basis, but he deserves it. He’s a game-changer in the running game and that was evident just by watching the Browns tight ends trying to block him. More often than not, they were knocked a few yards into the backfield, leaving the running back with little room to run and Mack with one of this team-high six stops. He also had two hits and four hurries on 24 rushes.
Signature Plays: It’s Mack’s power in the running game that shows up every week. Whether it was his domination of TE Jordan Cameron at the 6:51 mark of the first quarter or his blowing up the Browns’ toss play by manhandling TE Jim Dray with 8:13 to go in the third quarter, Mack was living in the Cleveland backfield all afternoon.
FireNellieQuick wrote:Carrie's fine. Calling him better than Mack, by any stretch, is ridiculous. Mack has been one of the BEST run stuffing linebackers in the NFL. On a team that doesn't open many gaps up front, that's incredible. Also among the leaders in hurries and QB hits. Like I already posted - Mack has been the most impactful rookie in the league. He's played with a poor front 7 - none of our front 7 outside of Mack/Moore are in the top half of the league
Twinkie defense wrote:FireNellieQuick wrote:Carrie's fine. Calling him better than Mack, by any stretch, is ridiculous. Mack has been one of the BEST run stuffing linebackers in the NFL. On a team that doesn't open many gaps up front, that's incredible. Also among the leaders in hurries and QB hits. Like I already posted - Mack has been the most impactful rookie in the league. He's played with a poor front 7 - none of our front 7 outside of Mack/Moore are in the top half of the league
I didn't say Carrie was better than Mack, I said oftentimes he looks more impactful. Sacks, INTs, causing fumbles and fumble recoveries, stuffs - these are impactful plays. Holding an RB to a short gain is great, but that's not why you draft someone at #5 overall. You pick someone #5 overall to be a game changer.
runtmc91 wrote:It's gonna be hard for Mack to get sacks when the corners can't cover and none of the other lineman are getting any push up front. If you watch him play instead of just reading stats, you'll see that he's constantly causing disruption. If anybody else on the defense besides Carrie or Woodson could actually do their job he'd shine even more. As it is, he's been the best player out of the draft so far this season. A great find.
FireNellieQuick wrote:Twinkie defense wrote:FireNellieQuick wrote:Carrie's fine. Calling him better than Mack, by any stretch, is ridiculous. Mack has been one of the BEST run stuffing linebackers in the NFL. On a team that doesn't open many gaps up front, that's incredible. Also among the leaders in hurries and QB hits. Like I already posted - Mack has been the most impactful rookie in the league. He's played with a poor front 7 - none of our front 7 outside of Mack/Moore are in the top half of the league
I didn't say Carrie was better than Mack, I said oftentimes he looks more impactful. Sacks, INTs, causing fumbles and fumble recoveries, stuffs - these are impactful plays. Holding an RB to a short gain is great, but that's not why you draft someone at #5 overall. You pick someone #5 overall to be a game changer.
Impactful like being a top ground LB while being in the top 5 in hits and QB hurries?
BTW, Houston got 15m gtd and needs to be on the roster for 3 years (or else is 9+M in dead cap money). For a guy who's grading out average among 4-3 DEs, thats a massive overpay.
I have no idea why Kelly's name comes up: he was a cap casualty long ago, and there was no getting around it. Ditto Shaughnessy-IR. Neither of whom have done much since leaving anyways. The only legitimate gripe is franchising Veldheer (never, ever Houston) and paying a slightly above average LT top 5 money. Instead Reggie tried to ink a guy who he thought was his LT for the next few years in Saffold, then nixed it due to the shoulder (the same one Saffold injured this past week). All in all, it worked out for us since Donald Penn is actually outperforming the 3. Though a case can be made that Penn benefits from Carr's saavy versus Veldheer having to deal with Drew Stanton for 3 weeks. If that is the case, Veldheer should have no problem making up the ground. He won't, but its a good talking point for those still stuck on Veldheer, as if a quality LT would change anything. Since we have one now.
at celebrating a sack in garbage time against a backup QB, down 25. That's not a big play. That's garbage time stat stuffing to make your boxscore look good. Houston is excellent at that. Well, he was.
FireNellieQuick wrote:No idea. Maybe getting arrested changed him? Either way its a whiff by Al, and another bust for us. Glad he's gone though. He was mental
Twinkie defense wrote:FireNellieQuick wrote:No idea. Maybe getting arrested changed him? Either way its a whiff by Al, and another bust for us. Glad he's gone though. He was mental
Definitely could have used something out of that pick - but go back, that pick was universally hailed. I'm sure FNQ was saying what a great pick it was at the time. Even during his rookie season he was getting praise.