Image Image Image Image

General Discussion: Bears 2016/17

Moderators: chitownsports4ever, emperorjones

User avatar
City of Trees
General Manager
Posts: 9,404
And1: 1,502
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Sacramento, CA
   

Re: General Discussion: Bears 2016/17 

Post#301 » by City of Trees » Fri Feb 3, 2017 9:51 pm

Should the Bears target Poe?

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app
patryk7754
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,146
And1: 468
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: General Discussion: Bears 2016/17 

Post#302 » by patryk7754 » Sat Feb 4, 2017 4:23 am

City of Trees wrote:Should the Bears target Poe?

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app

Sure. Goldman would have to move to DE but I don't think that'd be a problem. However I think one of the top priorities should be Calais Campbell.
patryk7754
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,146
And1: 468
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: General Discussion: Bears 2016/17 

Post#303 » by patryk7754 » Sun Feb 5, 2017 4:56 pm

Patriots will try to extend Brady this offseason. Expect him to play 3-5 more seasons
Via Ian Rapoport
User avatar
City of Trees
General Manager
Posts: 9,404
And1: 1,502
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Sacramento, CA
   

Re: General Discussion: Bears 2016/17 

Post#304 » by City of Trees » Mon Feb 6, 2017 4:50 am

How did Atlanta lose that game? Wow....

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app
heir_jordan22
Analyst
Posts: 3,729
And1: 172
Joined: Jul 16, 2008
   

Re: General Discussion: Bears 2016/17 

Post#305 » by heir_jordan22 » Mon Feb 6, 2017 2:42 pm

The people that say we should trade for Garoppolo because the Patriots wouldn't trade him if we were good enough to be a franchise quarterback... idk... just reevaluate your life.

Brady said he wants 4 more years. Brady is the greatest of all time. Brady is the only qb that matters to them.

Garoppolo is a good player. He will be offered a starting QB level contract next year if someone doesn't trade for him. Why would the Patriots just let him walk if the can trade him? They trade Collins. They traded Jones. Because they were going to walk. Not because they weren't good. They're the best players on their new teams

Sent from my SM-G920P using RealGM mobile app
Axxo
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,788
And1: 286
Joined: Jun 28, 2016

Re: General Discussion: Bears 2016/17 

Post#306 » by Axxo » Mon Feb 6, 2017 4:09 pm

City of Trees wrote:How did Atlanta lose that game? Wow....

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app


Choke mode successfully completed....
gobullschi
Pro Prospect
Posts: 784
And1: 26
Joined: May 23, 2006

Re: General Discussion: Bears 2016/17 

Post#307 » by gobullschi » Sun Mar 12, 2017 12:14 am

I would like to see a Kyle Fuller for Arik Armstead swap.

49ers are switching to a 4-3 defense. Armstead doesn't really fit the bill.
patryk7754
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,146
And1: 468
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: General Discussion: Bears 2016/17 

Post#308 » by patryk7754 » Sun Mar 12, 2017 3:37 am

gobullschi wrote:I would like to see a Kyle Fuller for Arik Armstead swap.

49ers are switching to a 4-3 defense. Armstead doesn't really fit the bill.

Why doesn't armstead fit the bill? A
User avatar
City of Trees
General Manager
Posts: 9,404
And1: 1,502
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Sacramento, CA
   

Re: RE: Re: General Discussion: Bears 2016/17 

Post#309 » by City of Trees » Sun Mar 12, 2017 4:20 am

patryk7754 wrote:
gobullschi wrote:I would like to see a Kyle Fuller for Arik Armstead swap.

49ers are switching to a 4-3 defense. Armstead doesn't really fit the bill.

Why doesn't armstead fit the bill? A

Niners will make it work with Armstead. If not, it will take a lot more than Fuller to get him.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app
gobullschi
Pro Prospect
Posts: 784
And1: 26
Joined: May 23, 2006

Re: General Discussion: Bears 2016/17 

Post#310 » by gobullschi » Sun Mar 12, 2017 6:30 pm

patryk7754 wrote:
gobullschi wrote:I would like to see a Kyle Fuller for Arik Armstead swap.

49ers are switching to a 4-3 defense. Armstead doesn't really fit the bill.

Why doesn't armstead fit the bill? A


He is a 3-4 end. Doesn't have the speed to be a 4-3 end. Since they are switching schemes, he doesn't really have a place on that defense.

Kyle Fuller + 4th Rounder should be enough to get Armstead.
heir_jordan22
Analyst
Posts: 3,729
And1: 172
Joined: Jul 16, 2008
   

Re: General Discussion: Bears 2016/17 

Post#311 » by heir_jordan22 » Sun Mar 12, 2017 6:34 pm

He can play dt

Sent from my SM-G920P using RealGM mobile app
patryk7754
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,146
And1: 468
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: General Discussion: Bears 2016/17 

Post#312 » by patryk7754 » Sun Mar 12, 2017 7:01 pm

gobullschi wrote:
patryk7754 wrote:
gobullschi wrote:I would like to see a Kyle Fuller for Arik Armstead swap.

49ers are switching to a 4-3 defense. Armstead doesn't really fit the bill.

Why doesn't armstead fit the bill? A


He is a 3-4 end. Doesn't have the speed to be a 4-3 end. Since they are switching schemes, he doesn't really have a place on that defense.

Kyle Fuller + 4th Rounder should be enough to get Armstead.

He'll probably play DT. Abd it's gonna take a lot more than a guy who hasn't played in more than a year and a mid round pick for him
gobullschi
Pro Prospect
Posts: 784
And1: 26
Joined: May 23, 2006

Re: General Discussion: Bears 2016/17 

Post#313 » by gobullschi » Sun Mar 12, 2017 8:15 pm

heir_jordan22 wrote:He can play dt

Sent from my SM-G920P using RealGM mobile app


He already has issues with his pad level so going inside isn't playing to his strength. It is just a poor fit.

Honestly, I don't know what the cost would be but a player to keep an eye on. Would love for Fangio to get his hands on him.

Return to Chicago Bears