Image Image Image Image

Mike Glennon

Moderators: chitownsports4ever, emperorjones

User avatar
City of Trees
General Manager
Posts: 9,863
And1: 1,758
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
   

Re: RE: Re: Mike Glennon 

Post#21 » by City of Trees » Wed Mar 8, 2017 7:59 pm

Susan wrote:Honestly, I like this. We get some stability at the QB spot and this will allow for us to draft & develop a QB without rushing him to start too early.

Basically this. Pacemust want Cutler far away from his young qb

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
RedBulls83
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 28,571
And1: 11,346
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
Location: Waiting in Grant Park
       

Re: Mike Glennon 

Post#22 » by RedBulls83 » Wed Mar 8, 2017 8:00 pm

Well, Niners just signed Hoyer.
Straight Buckets!

Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/NinetiesDynasty
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 42,565
And1: 9,584
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
     

Re: Mike Glennon 

Post#23 » by fleet » Wed Mar 8, 2017 8:02 pm

The Bears are bidding against themselves, and are overpricing. Only the Bears.....
JackFinn wrote:I see you're back from a trip at the smarty pants store.
User avatar
RedBulls83
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 28,571
And1: 11,346
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
Location: Waiting in Grant Park
       

Re: Mike Glennon 

Post#24 » by RedBulls83 » Wed Mar 8, 2017 8:04 pm

Susan wrote:Honestly, I like this. We get some stability at the QB spot and this will allow for us to draft & develop a QB without rushing him to start too early.

To me out all depends on the dollar amount and years. If they give him some Oswiler contract, I'm going to be pissed.
Straight Buckets!

Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/NinetiesDynasty
User avatar
RedBulls83
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 28,571
And1: 11,346
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
Location: Waiting in Grant Park
       

Re: Mike Glennon 

Post#25 » by RedBulls83 » Wed Mar 8, 2017 8:05 pm

fleet wrote:The Bears are bidding against themselves, and are overpricing. Only the Bears.....

What is the latest contract talks?
Straight Buckets!

Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/NinetiesDynasty
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 42,565
And1: 9,584
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
     

Re: Mike Glennon 

Post#26 » by fleet » Wed Mar 8, 2017 8:06 pm

Most young QBs drafted high end up starting very quickly. What the hell is the problem with that? Oh yeah, Pace doesnt want to be fired, so he reaches for a caretaker. And he probably will be fired anyway...
JackFinn wrote:I see you're back from a trip at the smarty pants store.
User avatar
RedBulls83
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 28,571
And1: 11,346
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
Location: Waiting in Grant Park
       

Re: Mike Glennon 

Post#27 » by RedBulls83 » Wed Mar 8, 2017 8:07 pm

Oh God...I just saw something about 15 million a year. Awful
Straight Buckets!

Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/NinetiesDynasty
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 42,565
And1: 9,584
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
     

Re: Mike Glennon 

Post#28 » by fleet » Wed Mar 8, 2017 8:08 pm

RedBulls83 wrote:
fleet wrote:The Bears are bidding against themselves, and are overpricing. Only the Bears.....

What is the latest contract talks?

All I have heard is that the Bears are the only team left that wants him at starting QB prices.
JackFinn wrote:I see you're back from a trip at the smarty pants store.
User avatar
Susan
RealGM
Posts: 14,009
And1: 1,532
Joined: Jan 25, 2005
Location: jackfinn & Scott May appreciation society
     

Re: Mike Glennon 

Post#29 » by Susan » Wed Mar 8, 2017 9:05 pm

RedBulls83 wrote:
Susan wrote:Honestly, I like this. We get some stability at the QB spot and this will allow for us to draft & develop a QB without rushing him to start too early.

To me out all depends on the dollar amount and years. If they give him some Oswiler contract, I'm going to be pissed.


3 years $14m per wouldn't be Brock like. Brock got 4 years $18m per.

Honestly this reminds me so much of Matt Flynn in Seattle. They took a gamble on Flynn and also drafted Russell Wilson in the 3rd. Glennon is more established than either Brock or Flynn IMO and
User avatar
chitownsports4ever
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 18,760
And1: 542
Joined: Jan 30, 2002
Location: southside of chicago
       

Re: Mike Glennon 

Post#30 » by chitownsports4ever » Wed Mar 8, 2017 9:16 pm

fleet wrote:Most young QBs drafted high end up starting very quickly. What the hell is the problem with that? Oh yeah, Pace doesnt want to be fired, so he reaches for a caretaker. And he probably will be fired anyway...


Pretty much and now you have to go into the season having to wait on a new caretaker qb to learn the offense . This is not a good start for the Bears .
Got a Gold Name Plate that says "I wish you would"
User avatar
RedBulls83
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 28,571
And1: 11,346
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
Location: Waiting in Grant Park
       

Re: Mike Glennon 

Post#31 » by RedBulls83 » Wed Mar 8, 2017 10:07 pm

Susan wrote:
RedBulls83 wrote:
Susan wrote:Honestly, I like this. We get some stability at the QB spot and this will allow for us to draft & develop a QB without rushing him to start too early.

To me out all depends on the dollar amount and years. If they give him some Oswiler contract, I'm going to be pissed.


3 years $14m per wouldn't be Brock like. Brock got 4 years $18m per.

Honestly this reminds me so much of Matt Flynn in Seattle. They took a gamble on Flynn and also drafted Russell Wilson in the 3rd. Glennon is more established than either Brock or Flynn IMO and

14 mil for a guy that hasn't proven anything is still a lot. If he proves himself, you can always rework a deal in a couple of years.

Especially when you're the only team gunning for his services as a starter.

No thanks for that dollar amount.
Straight Buckets!

Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/NinetiesDynasty
Axxo
Starter
Posts: 2,174
And1: 350
Joined: Jun 28, 2016

Re: Mike Glennon 

Post#32 » by Axxo » Wed Mar 8, 2017 10:11 pm

Why don't we just get Kirk Cousins, pay him what he is worth then we won't need to develop another QB or overpay a bridge guy.
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 11,457
And1: 1,192
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Mike Glennon 

Post#33 » by Chi town » Wed Mar 8, 2017 10:16 pm

patryk7754 wrote:Apparently we signed him to 3 year/14 mil deal.


Link? How much guaranteed?
patryk7754
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,227
And1: 470
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: Mike Glennon 

Post#34 » by patryk7754 » Wed Mar 8, 2017 10:18 pm

Chi town wrote:
patryk7754 wrote:Apparently we signed him to 3 year/14 mil deal.


Link? How much guaranteed?

I got a notification on my phone from cbs sports. It was 14 a year and it didn't say how much was guaranteed
Chi town
RealGM
Posts: 11,457
And1: 1,192
Joined: Aug 10, 2004

Re: Mike Glennon 

Post#35 » by Chi town » Wed Mar 8, 2017 10:20 pm

Dominater wrote:
Chi town wrote:1. Glennon is a safe bridge QB that is basically Hoyer with a deep ball.

2. Pace will probably sign him to a 2-3 year deal but with 10-14M guaranteed up front... basically a one year QB that is cheaper than Jay this season.

3. If Pace wants a QB that is worthy of the 3rd pick he can take him and let him learn the system and settle in. If Glennon shows he's legit then you have a good problem.

4. No way you overpay for Jimmy G when you can pay Glennon for basically a 1yr deal and then just sign Jimmy G next year for big money. Dont' have to waste any picks. There is NO WAY Jimmy G stays behind Brady after next season. He will want to start and be paid. Only way you get Jimmy G now is if Patriots lower their price and you send them a 2nd and 4th. Pace is being smart and patient.

The only way a team is getting Jimmy is thru trade. He will be traded this offseason. Belichik always prefers to let go of someone a year early as opposed to a year late. If the Bears feel that he can be their franchise QB for the next 10 years, then no price is too high


I'm not so sure.

If Pats really think he is legit they won't give him away for less than two 1sts and I dont' see anyone giving him that. That includes the Browns.

I could see Brady declining as well. I know he's superhuman and eats like a caveman but he will eventually decline and if they think Jimmy G is the next big time star they won't let him go.
Axxo
Starter
Posts: 2,174
And1: 350
Joined: Jun 28, 2016

Re: Mike Glennon 

Post#36 » by Axxo » Wed Mar 8, 2017 10:37 pm

patryk7754 wrote:
Chi town wrote:
patryk7754 wrote:Apparently we signed him to 3 year/14 mil deal.


Link? How much guaranteed?

I got a notification on my phone from cbs sports. It was 14 a year and it didn't say how much was guaranteed


I haven't seen anything pop up about this
User avatar
Susan
RealGM
Posts: 14,009
And1: 1,532
Joined: Jan 25, 2005
Location: jackfinn & Scott May appreciation society
     

Re: Mike Glennon 

Post#37 » by Susan » Wed Mar 8, 2017 11:01 pm

RedBulls83 wrote:
Susan wrote:
RedBulls83 wrote:To me out all depends on the dollar amount and years. If they give him some Oswiler contract, I'm going to be pissed.


3 years $14m per wouldn't be Brock like. Brock got 4 years $18m per.

Honestly this reminds me so much of Matt Flynn in Seattle. They took a gamble on Flynn and also drafted Russell Wilson in the 3rd. Glennon is more established than either Brock or Flynn IMO and

14 mil for a guy that hasn't proven anything is still a lot. If he proves himself, you can always rework a deal in a couple of years.

Especially when you're the only team gunning for his services as a starter.

No thanks for that dollar amount.


A TD/INT ratio of 30/15 isn't nothing.
User avatar
RedBulls83
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 28,571
And1: 11,346
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
Location: Waiting in Grant Park
       

Re: Mike Glennon 

Post#38 » by RedBulls83 » Wed Mar 8, 2017 11:05 pm

Axxo wrote:Why don't we just get Kirk Cousins, pay him what he is worth then we won't need to develop another QB or overpay a bridge guy.

When another team decides they aren't in a hurry to keep their own QB, then that should give anyone red flags.

Edit: actually, I change my mind. I'd much rather have him than Glennon.
Straight Buckets!

Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/NinetiesDynasty
User avatar
RedBulls83
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 28,571
And1: 11,346
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
Location: Waiting in Grant Park
       

Re: Mike Glennon 

Post#39 » by RedBulls83 » Wed Mar 8, 2017 11:09 pm

Chi town wrote:
patryk7754 wrote:Apparently we signed him to 3 year/14 mil deal.


Link? How much guaranteed?

Don't see it either.
Straight Buckets!

Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/NinetiesDynasty
User avatar
RedBulls83
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 28,571
And1: 11,346
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
Location: Waiting in Grant Park
       

Re: Mike Glennon 

Post#40 » by RedBulls83 » Wed Mar 8, 2017 11:13 pm

Tyrod Taylor signed for 8.5 million, yet bears are going to give Glennon 14 a year???

God dammit. :banghead:
Straight Buckets!

Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/NinetiesDynasty

Return to Chicago Bears