Image Image Image Image

OT: Mark Sanchez

Moderators: chitownsports4ever, emperorjones

Axxo
Starter
Posts: 2,181
And1: 350
Joined: Jun 28, 2016

OT: Mark Sanchez 

Post#1 » by Axxo » Wed Mar 22, 2017 4:43 pm

Bears bringing in Sanchez for a visit. Possible back up over Shaw and Fales.

http://bearswire.usatoday.com/2017/03/21/bears-bringing-in-mark-sanchez-for-visit/

Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk
patryk7754
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,229
And1: 470
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: OT: Mark Sanchez 

Post#2 » by patryk7754 » Wed Mar 22, 2017 7:57 pm

He's probably better than Shaw definitely better than Fales. Sometimes he's good sometimes he's bad. Hopefully, if we sign him we'll never have to find out if he'll be good or bad for us. I think there are some better options

Ryan Fitzpatrick
Chase Daniel
Austin Davis
RGIII
User avatar
Bomba Navarro
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,878
And1: 1,701
Joined: Sep 11, 2011
Location: In the Amish paradise
   

Re: OT: Mark Sanchez 

Post#3 » by Bomba Navarro » Wed Mar 22, 2017 8:14 pm

I hope this means we won't draft a QB in the first round. It doesn't really look like any of them is worth drafting that high.
suckfish wrote:Lucas. You. Inside. Me. Slow. But. Fast.

The turd!
heir_jordan22
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,815
And1: 176
Joined: Jul 16, 2008
   

Re: RE: Re: OT: Mark Sanchez 

Post#4 » by heir_jordan22 » Thu Mar 23, 2017 5:04 am

Bomba Navarro wrote:I hope this means we won't draft a QB in the first round. It doesn't really look like any of them is worth drafting that high.

That's what I hope too. 2nd would be ok. 3rd or 4th would be just right for this draft imo

Sent from my SM-G920P using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
City of Trees
General Manager
Posts: 9,895
And1: 1,762
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
   

Re: OT: Mark Sanchez 

Post#5 » by City of Trees » Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:50 am

Jesus we get rid of Cutler and bring in his brother Sanchez? Lmao f'ing Bears.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
chitownsports4ever
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 18,766
And1: 544
Joined: Jan 30, 2002
Location: southside of chicago
       

Re: OT: Mark Sanchez 

Post#6 » by chitownsports4ever » Thu Mar 23, 2017 4:34 pm

City of Trees wrote:Jesus we get rid of Cutler and bring in his brother Sanchez? Lmao f'ing Bears.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app


:lol: total disarray
Got a Gold Name Plate that says "I wish you would"
patryk7754
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,229
And1: 470
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: OT: Mark Sanchez 

Post#7 » by patryk7754 » Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:21 pm

chitownsports4ever wrote:
City of Trees wrote:Jesus we get rid of Cutler and bring in his brother Sanchez? Lmao f'ing Bears.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app


:lol: total disarray

He's a solid backup
User avatar
chitownsports4ever
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 18,766
And1: 544
Joined: Jan 30, 2002
Location: southside of chicago
       

Re: OT: Mark Sanchez 

Post#8 » by chitownsports4ever » Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:23 pm

patryk7754 wrote:
chitownsports4ever wrote:
City of Trees wrote:Jesus we get rid of Cutler and bring in his brother Sanchez? Lmao f'ing Bears.

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app


:lol: total disarray

He's a solid backup


since when ? Sanchez is terrible
Got a Gold Name Plate that says "I wish you would"
User avatar
City of Trees
General Manager
Posts: 9,895
And1: 1,762
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
   

Re: RE: Re: OT: Mark Sanchez 

Post#9 » by City of Trees » Thu Mar 23, 2017 9:17 pm

chitownsports4ever wrote:
patryk7754 wrote:
chitownsports4ever wrote:
total disarray

He's a solid backup


since when ? Sanchez is terrible

Sanchez was a decent back up before his shoulder injury. Now his arm is hot garbage

Sent from my SM-J700T using RealGM mobile app
patryk7754
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,229
And1: 470
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: OT: Mark Sanchez 

Post#10 » by patryk7754 » Thu Mar 23, 2017 10:02 pm

chitownsports4ever wrote:
patryk7754 wrote:
chitownsports4ever wrote:
:lol: total disarray

He's a solid backup


since when ? Sanchez is terrible

Since the last time he got significant playing time which was in philly where he stepped in nicely for them.

Just because people still make fun of him for the butt fumble doesn't mean he's bad.
User avatar
chitownsports4ever
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 18,766
And1: 544
Joined: Jan 30, 2002
Location: southside of chicago
       

Re: OT: Mark Sanchez 

Post#11 » by chitownsports4ever » Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:59 pm

patryk7754 wrote:
chitownsports4ever wrote:
patryk7754 wrote:He's a solid backup


since when ? Sanchez is terrible

Since the last time he got significant playing time which was in philly where he stepped in nicely for them.

Just because people still make fun of him for the butt fumble doesn't mean he's bad.


He was still bad in Philly running Chip Kellys offense loaded with weapons . Its not about making fun of him hes is not a good qb at all.
Got a Gold Name Plate that says "I wish you would"
patryk7754
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,229
And1: 470
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: OT: Mark Sanchez 

Post#12 » by patryk7754 » Fri Mar 24, 2017 12:20 am

chitownsports4ever wrote:
patryk7754 wrote:
chitownsports4ever wrote:
since when ? Sanchez is terrible

Since the last time he got significant playing time which was in philly where he stepped in nicely for them.

Just because people still make fun of him for the butt fumble doesn't mean he's bad.


He was still bad in Philly running Chip Kellys offense loaded with weapons . Its not about making fun of him hes is not a good qb at all.

these are his stats during his time in philly

2014: 64.1 completion % 2,418 yards, 14 TD, 11 INTs, 88.4 passer rating

2015: 64.8%, 616 yards, 4 td, 4 int, 80.7 rating.

Those aren't bad for a back up. and he had those numbers in spite of kelly's offense.

Are those great numbers? obviously not. But are they terrible or laughable? No.
patryk7754
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,229
And1: 470
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: OT: Mark Sanchez 

Post#13 » by patryk7754 » Fri Mar 24, 2017 12:55 am

just got a notification that we're expected to sign him, according to Raporport
Axxo
Starter
Posts: 2,181
And1: 350
Joined: Jun 28, 2016

Re: OT: Mark Sanchez 

Post#14 » by Axxo » Fri Mar 24, 2017 12:58 am

Yay Mark Sanchez!! Why draft Trubisky when you can have the original! J/k. I think this means we won't be getting a QB this draft.

Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk
User avatar
bearadonisdna
General Manager
Posts: 9,162
And1: 1,033
Joined: Jul 07, 2012

Re: OT: Mark Sanchez 

Post#15 » by bearadonisdna » Fri Mar 24, 2017 1:19 am

Rg3 or johnny manziel, then fitzpatrick.
Or two of these guys.
The qb position doesnt grow on trees.
If they are targeting sanchez because he is a minimum contract sort of guy then i understand. It would be a good signing but rg3 and manziel have more upside.

I understand manziels party rep, but i hope chicago can give him the spotlight he craves while still being responsible off the field.

If all these guys are minimum contract guys then sign all 3 and cut glennon.
patryk7754
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,229
And1: 470
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: OT: Mark Sanchez 

Post#16 » by patryk7754 » Fri Mar 24, 2017 1:33 am

bearadonisdna wrote:Rg3 or johnny manziel, then fitzpatrick.
Or two of these guys.
The qb position doesnt grow on trees.
If they are targeting sanchez because he is a minimum contract sort of guy then i understand. It would be a good signing but rg3 and manziel have more upside.

I understand manziels party rep, but i hope chicago can give him the spotlight he craves while still being responsible off the field.

If all these guys are minimum contract guys then sign all 3 and cut glennon.

wut
heir_jordan22
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,815
And1: 176
Joined: Jul 16, 2008
   

Re: OT: Mark Sanchez 

Post#17 » by heir_jordan22 » Fri Mar 24, 2017 2:46 am

The Bears have shown they're not dealing with guys that are controversial or adversarial. Ratliff, gone. Marshall, gone. Gould, gone. They cleared out veterans who wouldn't get with the program.

They brought in Hoyer to be the backup, and essentially act as an additional qb coach. That's what most veteran backups do: help the starter prepare, help the younger guys develop, all while getting just enough reps to play in a pinch. He filled the role extremely well. Reports said we were interested in bringing him back, but he got an offer to start, so he left.

If you don't go with the veteran backup who is like an extra coach, you go with a young, hungry, smart qb who can develop and compete. Manziel and Griffin aren't smart or hungry, so they most likely will not develop.

Manziel is the biggest headache the league has seen in years. And everything I've read about RGIII says he's not big into film study. No.

Sanchez has shown he can perform in a pinch. He's been involved involved in several offenses and still produced adequately. I don't think k he's the most talented qb, so it must be because he absorbs the playbooks well. So he's smart. That's what you want.

Sent from my SM-G920P using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
chitownsports4ever
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 18,766
And1: 544
Joined: Jan 30, 2002
Location: southside of chicago
       

Re: OT: Mark Sanchez 

Post#18 » by chitownsports4ever » Fri Mar 24, 2017 3:48 am

patryk7754 wrote:
chitownsports4ever wrote:
patryk7754 wrote:Since the last time he got significant playing time which was in philly where he stepped in nicely for them.

Just because people still make fun of him for the butt fumble doesn't mean he's bad.


He was still bad in Philly running Chip Kellys offense loaded with weapons . Its not about making fun of him hes is not a good qb at all.

these are his stats during his time in philly

2014: 64.1 completion % 2,418 yards, 14 TD, 11 INTs, 88.4 passer rating

2015: 64.8%, 616 yards, 4 td, 4 int, 80.7 rating.

Those aren't bad for a back up. and he had those numbers in spite of kelly's offense.

Are those great numbers? obviously not. But are they terrible or laughable? No.


He was horrible in Philly those numbers dont make him serviceable when you consider what he was surrounded with at the time .

The Broncos traded for him and then cut him because they decided they would rather go with Austin Davis who they then cut in season LOL and now is a free agent .

This franchise is in disarray .
Got a Gold Name Plate that says "I wish you would"
patryk7754
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,229
And1: 470
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: OT: Mark Sanchez 

Post#19 » by patryk7754 » Fri Mar 24, 2017 4:02 am

chitownsports4ever wrote:
patryk7754 wrote:
chitownsports4ever wrote:
He was still bad in Philly running Chip Kellys offense loaded with weapons . Its not about making fun of him hes is not a good qb at all.

these are his stats during his time in philly

2014: 64.1 completion % 2,418 yards, 14 TD, 11 INTs, 88.4 passer rating

2015: 64.8%, 616 yards, 4 td, 4 int, 80.7 rating.

Those aren't bad for a back up. and he had those numbers in spite of kelly's offense.

Are those great numbers? obviously not. But are they terrible or laughable? No.


He was horrible in Philly those numbers dont make him serviceable when you consider what he was surrounded with at the time .

The Broncos traded for him and then cut him because they decided they would rather go with Austin Davis who they then cut in season LOL and now is a free agent .

This franchise is in disarray .

He's not horrible, that's just not true. He's serviceable.

And how exactly is this franchise in disarray because we signed Sanchez to be a 2nd or 3rd QB to a one year deal?
User avatar
chitownsports4ever
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 18,766
And1: 544
Joined: Jan 30, 2002
Location: southside of chicago
       

Re: OT: Mark Sanchez 

Post#20 » by chitownsports4ever » Fri Mar 24, 2017 4:13 am

patryk7754 wrote:
chitownsports4ever wrote:
patryk7754 wrote:these are his stats during his time in philly

2014: 64.1 completion % 2,418 yards, 14 TD, 11 INTs, 88.4 passer rating

2015: 64.8%, 616 yards, 4 td, 4 int, 80.7 rating.

Those aren't bad for a back up. and he had those numbers in spite of kelly's offense.

Are those great numbers? obviously not. But are they terrible or laughable? No.


He was horrible in Philly those numbers dont make him serviceable when you consider what he was surrounded with at the time .

The Broncos traded for him and then cut him because they decided they would rather go with Austin Davis who they then cut in season LOL and now is a free agent .

This franchise is in disarray .

He's not horrible, that's just not true. He's serviceable.

And how exactly is this franchise in disarray because we signed Sanchez to be a 2nd or 3rd QB to a one year deal?


Hes not even serviceable because it has no real direction because Pace is shaping up to be worse than Emery at this point . If I sign enough low tier talent in free agent maybe one of them will be comeback player of the year while I try and build a team solely through the draft ?

I cant believe it but at this point this teams is worse than last years team .
Got a Gold Name Plate that says "I wish you would"

Return to Chicago Bears