Image Image Image Image

Richard Sherman

Moderators: chitownsports4ever, emperorjones

patryk7754
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,293
And1: 481
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Richard Sherman 

Post#1 » by patryk7754 » Fri Apr 7, 2017 9:41 pm

I think we should trade for him. He's been the best Corner for the past couple seasons and before that he was only second to Revis. He fits perfectly in our system and something that's underrated about him is that he's a great tackler and possibly the best tackling corner in the NFL. There's really no reason not to go after him. To put his hall of fame career in perspective here are some numbers

30 interceptions (ten more than anyone else since 2011), 4 probowls, 3 1st team all-pro, 1 superbowl in his first six season. Those numbers are identical to Deion Sanders.

I'd easily give up a second for him. It'd probably take a 2nd and a 4th which i'd do after negotiating
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 42,903
And1: 9,819
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
     

Re: Richard Sherman 

Post#2 » by fleet » Sat Apr 8, 2017 1:39 am

I think the corners they signed, and drafting Adams or a trade down for Hooker (or even Lattimore) will finish off the secondary for now. The Bears are bad, we don't need to make a move like that this year. That is more a move that finishes off your team to get over the hump.
JackFinn wrote:I see you're back from a trip at the smarty pants store.
heir_jordan22
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,911
And1: 195
Joined: Jul 16, 2008
   

Re: RE: Re: Richard Sherman 

Post#3 » by heir_jordan22 » Sat Apr 8, 2017 12:17 pm

fleet wrote:I think the corners they signed, and drafting Adams or a trade down for Hooker (or even Lattimore) will finish off the secondary for now. The Bears are bad, we don't need to make a move like that this year. That is more a move that finishes off your team to get over the hump.

I agree. And I think if he is available now he will be available next season for less. Maybe then.

Sent from my SM-G920P using RealGM mobile app
patryk7754
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,293
And1: 481
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: Richard Sherman 

Post#4 » by patryk7754 » Tue Apr 11, 2017 11:05 pm

I disagree that we are a bad team. I think this team is contending for the division and/or a playoff spot.

I believe the Seahawks original asking price was a 1st and a good player. Then it went to a 1st and a mid round pick. And now the price has reportedly dropped again (according to bleacher report). If we can get Sherman for fuller and a 2nd, it'd be really really dumb not to do it.
heir_jordan22
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,911
And1: 195
Joined: Jul 16, 2008
   

Re: Richard Sherman 

Post#5 » by heir_jordan22 » Wed Apr 12, 2017 12:24 pm

That would be a good deal. Ideally we would do Fuller and a third because we can getting a starting WR or OT with that second rounder. Or our future franchise QB

Sent from my SM-G920P using RealGM mobile app
patryk7754
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,293
And1: 481
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: Richard Sherman 

Post#6 » by patryk7754 » Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:10 pm

Watching mike and mike and the former GM of the Bucs (can't remember his name) said he thinks the price for Sherman is a 2nd and 6th or a pick from next year

Return to Chicago Bears