texasholdem wrote:red96 wrote:On the other hand Rondo would get our turnovers down.
Don't we win more games when we have high turnovers rather than low?
if a PG has no turnovers, he is not doing his job.
texasholdem wrote:red96 wrote:On the other hand Rondo would get our turnovers down.
Don't we win more games when we have high turnovers rather than low?
Tim Horton wrote:rumor has it that it's Parsons/Lin/Asik/1st rd pick for Rondo/Green....
Rondo/Harden/Green/PF/Dwight... not bad.
13th Man wrote:Tim Horton wrote:rumor has it that it's Parsons/Lin/Asik/1st rd pick for Rondo/Green....
Rondo/Harden/Green/PF/Dwight... not bad.
Wow, could be one that works out for both teams in terms of bolstering their starting lineups but I think Houston would be giving up a bit too much especially with the 1st rounder.
Definitely would be a good deal for Boston as they're leveraging off the fact that Houston wants to get rid of Asik and Lin's contracts but I don't see Morey being quite this desperate though. Giving up Parsons is a huge deal already, piling on with the 1st rounder is unnecessary imo lol.
MaxRider wrote:13th Man wrote:Tim Horton wrote:rumor has it that it's Parsons/Lin/Asik/1st rd pick for Rondo/Green....
Rondo/Harden/Green/PF/Dwight... not bad.
Wow, could be one that works out for both teams in terms of bolstering their starting lineups but I think Houston would be giving up a bit too much especially with the 1st rounder.
Definitely would be a good deal for Boston as they're leveraging off the fact that Houston wants to get rid of Asik and Lin's contracts but I don't see Morey being quite this desperate though. Giving up Parsons is a huge deal already, piling on with the 1st rounder is unnecessary imo lol.
lol i posted this earlier and it was at the bottom of page 2
it would be better if it's deng instead of green
El Turco wrote:Nothing wrong with men shaking their ass while other men in tights jump on top of each other.
Meatcookie wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/ESPNSteinLine/status/436236085484470272[/tweet]
13th Man wrote:MaxRider wrote:13th Man wrote:
Wow, could be one that works out for both teams in terms of bolstering their starting lineups but I think Houston would be giving up a bit too much especially with the 1st rounder.
Definitely would be a good deal for Boston as they're leveraging off the fact that Houston wants to get rid of Asik and Lin's contracts but I don't see Morey being quite this desperate though. Giving up Parsons is a huge deal already, piling on with the 1st rounder is unnecessary imo lol.
lol i posted this earlier and it was at the bottom of page 2
it would be better if it's deng instead of green
I missed the post but good point. Rondo + Green is not enough for that huge lot.
BaYBaller wrote:13th Man wrote:MaxRider wrote:lol i posted this earlier and it was at the bottom of page 2
it would be better if it's deng instead of green
I missed the post but good point. Rondo + Green is not enough for that huge lot.
If you really think about it though it really comes down to Parsons for Rondo in the long-run. I think any trade where you basically trade two heavy rotation players (Parsons and Lin) mid-season it's going to hurt the team in the short-run, but in the long-run Asik and Lin aren't in the Rockets plans, so using them to get value whenever you can get it is good.
The real asset is Parsons, who can be had for the rest of this year and next year on the cheap, or the value of declining the player-option to take advantage of his then RFA status. On the other side of the equation Rondo is the big piece and is IMO absolutely a game changer if healthy, however I haven't really been watching him since he came back from injury this season so I'm mostly going off what he's done in the past. The dude was basically elite at everything but shooting.
And then if Green is included he would be the filler at SF for Parsons but I'm not a fan of his contract, who has 2 years remaining plus a player-option (which he will likely opt-in for) for a 3rd year for ~9M a year. Bleh.
I dunno... not sure how I feel about this trade. If it does go through I don't see us having any chance getting past the 2nd round in the playoffs.
If you really think about it though it really comes down to Parsons for Rondo in the long-run. I think any trade where you basically trade two heavy rotation players (Parsons and Lin) mid-season it's going to hurt the team in the short-run, but in the long-run Asik and Lin aren't in the Rockets plans, so using them to get value whenever you can get it is good.
The real asset is Parsons, who can be had for the rest of this year and next year on the cheap, or the value of declining the player-option to take advantage of his then RFA status. On the other side of the equation Rondo is the big piece and is IMO absolutely a game changer if healthy, however I haven't really been watching him since he came back from injury this season so I'm mostly going off what he's done in the past. The dude was basically elite at everything but shooting.
And then if Green is included he would be the filler at SF for Parsons but I'm not a fan of his contract, who has 2 years remaining plus a player-option (which he will likely opt-in for) for a 3rd year for ~9M a year. Bleh.
I dunno... not sure how I feel about this trade. If it does go through I don't see us having any chance getting past the 2nd round in the playoffs.
13th Man wrote:If you really think about it though it really comes down to Parsons for Rondo in the long-run. I think any trade where you basically trade two heavy rotation players (Parsons and Lin) mid-season it's going to hurt the team in the short-run, but in the long-run Asik and Lin aren't in the Rockets plans, so using them to get value whenever you can get it is good.
The real asset is Parsons, who can be had for the rest of this year and next year on the cheap, or the value of declining the player-option to take advantage of his then RFA status. On the other side of the equation Rondo is the big piece and is IMO absolutely a game changer if healthy, however I haven't really been watching him since he came back from injury this season so I'm mostly going off what he's done in the past. The dude was basically elite at everything but shooting.
And then if Green is included he would be the filler at SF for Parsons but I'm not a fan of his contract, who has 2 years remaining plus a player-option (which he will likely opt-in for) for a 3rd year for ~9M a year. Bleh.
I dunno... not sure how I feel about this trade. If it does go through I don't see us having any chance getting past the 2nd round in the playoffs.
I'm thinking that Houston's plan is to win within the next couple of years, you don't really want to plan too far ahead due to uncertainties. If this is the case, shedding 3 of your 2-year remaining contracts doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Maybe trying to get rid of Asik + Lin because they're expensive bench players but acquiring Rondo in this manner would not only deplete our bench but would also bring the value/importance of Beverley back down to earth. Harden would also be forced to change up his game. I just think there are too many sacrifices to be made for this scenario to work and we would lose much needed depth.
Thanks for the honesty.MorbidHEAT wrote:My dislike for Lin started during Linsanity. It was absurd. It's probably irrational dislike at this point, but man he gets on my nerves. He's been tearing us up though.