BaYBaller wrote:texasholdem wrote:BaYBaller wrote:Nelson is terrible and would be a terrible fit here. He shot <40% for 2 seasons in a row! I want no part of that. I'd rather roll the dice on the youngsters.
Beverley's 41% isn't really that much better.
1) I would say 2% is is pretty significant, actually. Someone improves 2% in a year on FG%, people would say that player improved a lot. But that's semantics.
2) Bev getting paid less than a mil a year, Nelson got 3m/yr
3) Bev is a better rebounder
4) And oh yeah, Bev is one of the best defensive PGs in the league
5) Nelson isn't going to get any time at SG because he's too small, so very limited minutes
Yes 41% is better than 39% but what I meant was neither are adequate for a starting PG.
I'm fine with not signing Nelson. I just am not sure a PG rotation of Bev, NickJ and Canaan is going to cut it.