ILB Position has been ignored for years

gbmb34 · Post #41 » by **gbmb34** » Sun Sep 7, 2014 4:58 am

Brad Jones was even drafted as a 3-4 OLB furthering the idea that TT doesn't ever draft them.

Agree with the sentiment that our MLB have not been athletic enough over the years, especially Hawk. Guillon was also horrid. The middle triangle of the defense is basically the three worst players. Not a good sign.

emunney · Post #42 » by **emunney** » Sun Sep 7, 2014 6:15 am

I think we do need some fresh ideas on both sides of the ball, but putting lipstick on Brad Jones and Guion isn't going to help if they keep playing the way they did Thursday night. It should be said that while I'm not a fan, that may have been Jones' worst game. I don't know Guion from Adam but he looked like a blocking sled out there.

JHSFIVE · Post #43 » by **JHSFIVE** » Tue Sep 9, 2014 4:24 pm

TED!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Get on the phone!!!

http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/8441/arthur-brown

mlloyd10 · Post #44 » by **mlloyd10** » Tue Sep 9, 2014 4:40 pm

Starks for Brown

LUKE23 · Post #45 » by **LUKE23** » Tue Sep 9, 2014 4:42 pm

Liked Brown a lot coming out. Wonder what it would take to get him.

LUKE23 · Post #46 » by **LUKE23** » Tue Sep 9, 2014 4:42 pm

mlloyd10 wrote:Starks for Brown

With Lacy's injury risks? No chance in hell that happens.

JHSFIVE · Post #47 » by **JHSFIVE** » Tue Sep 9, 2014 4:43 pm

mlloyd10 wrote:Starks for Brown

Starks is pretty valuable to is w lacy and his concussion(s)

Still really interested.

bigkurty · Post #48 » by **bigkurty** » Tue Sep 9, 2014 5:25 pm

34 year old Larry Foote looked 100 times better for the cards yesterday than Hawk or Jones. Why couldn't we have just signed him as a stop gap? And wow is it fun to watch a defense and players that attack versus our bend but don't break weak crap.

JHSFIVE · Post #49 » by **JHSFIVE** » Tue Sep 9, 2014 5:37 pm

So u give up a 5th... Who cares!?!

Flames24Rulz · Post #50 » by **Flames24Rulz** » Tue Sep 9, 2014 6:30 pm

Can't give up a 5th round pick...too valuable!

JHSFIVE · Post #51 » by **JHSFIVE** » Tue Sep 9, 2014 7:09 pm

I'd give up Abberderis or Bradford in a second...

Cannot roll with Brad Jones much longer.... Why was he holding that Int up in the air like that?? did anyone else wonder about that play?

trwi7 · Post #52 » by **trwi7** » Tue Sep 9, 2014 7:42 pm

JHSFIVE wrote:I'd give up Abberderis or Bradford in a second...

Cannot roll with Brad Jones much longer.... Why was he holding that Int up in the air like that?? did anyone else wonder about that play?

I understand what he did. You try to bring it down and it hits a pad and you drop it but once he had it secured in his hands, just bring it down. It's like he held it up as if to say "see, I don't suck!"

RiotPunch · Post #53 » by **RiotPunch** » Tue Sep 9, 2014 7:51 pm

Arthur Brown would be such a nice get for this defense. I love that guy's attitude, physicality and talent. I think I would do Starks for him. I would rather go the draft pick route though.

Balls2TheWalls · Post #54 » by **Balls2TheWalls** » Tue Sep 9, 2014 8:13 pm

Arthur Brown makes a ton of sense in a trade. There is no way we make it though.

Buckrageous · Post #55 » by **Buckrageous** » Tue Sep 9, 2014 9:19 pm

JHSFIVE wrote:I'd give up Abberderis or Bradford in a second...

Cannot roll with Brad Jones much longer.... Why was he holding that Int up in the air like that?? did anyone else wonder about that play?

Could of had Jon Beason for the pick that was Bradford (less actually) last year

th87 · Post #56 » by **th87** » Tue Sep 9, 2014 9:38 pm

And Beason turned the Giants defense around. These are the types of moves the FO needs to identify and execute. Not saying everything will be good, but not everything will be bad either.

Buckrageous · Post #57 » by **Buckrageous** » Tue Sep 9, 2014 11:19 pm

th87 wrote:And Beason turned the Giants defense around. These are the types of moves the FO needs to identify and execute. Not saying everything will be good, but not everything will be bad either.

Yeah, Giants gave up a 7th. Pack could of had him instead of Demetri Goodson. Oh well

midranger · Post #58 » by **midranger** » Tue Sep 9, 2014 11:27 pm

Hell, the Pack could have had Borland rather than trying to upgrade their 4th WR position.

JHSFIVE · Post #59 » by **JHSFIVE** » Tue Sep 9, 2014 11:53 pm

midranger wrote:Hell, the Pack could have had Borland rather than trying to upgrade their 4th WR position.

5th... Adams is 4th.

Also. We kind of overrate Borland a bit, imo

emunney · Post #60 » by **emunney** » Wed Sep 10, 2014 3:04 am

JHSFIVE wrote:
midranger wrote:Hell, the Pack could have had Borland rather than trying to upgrade their 4th WR position.

5th... Adams is 4th.

Also. We kind of overrate Borland a bit, imo

4th is right. Borland went in the 3rd round.