DocHoliday wrote:
fail
Am I missing the fail?
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
DocHoliday wrote:
fail
Kerb Hohl wrote:Ah, I see. "3 planes" even though 2 legs and that isn't where London is
I think they might have meant the team an and staff have 3 total planes?
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
Newz wrote:In regard to the QB discussion and "who you take" to start a team...
I never got to see Starr or Otto Graham, but I have to imagine those guys should also be in the discussion. Starr is pretty highly ranked in a lot of efficiency stats and Graham led his team to 10 straight Championship appearances. Obviously the game was so different back then and it's almost impossible to project those guys into the modern era, but both of them were very impressive for their time.
Again, if you give me the modern rules then Rodgers is the first guy that I take of all-time with Young right behind him. If you set the rules back 20-30 years then I am taking Favre or Brady with Manning and Marino right behind them.