ImageImage

Game 3: Kansas City at Green Bay

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

User avatar
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 34,443
And1: 7,253
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: Game 3: Kansas City at Green Bay 

Post#301 » by Mags FTW » Tue Sep 29, 2015 4:12 am

It's not manufactured doom and gloom. If they get that 2-point, then there is a meaningful onside kick. The same crap happened against Atlanta last year.
Balls2TheWalls
RealGM
Posts: 19,565
And1: 3,593
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
         

Re: RE: Re: Game 3: Kansas City at Green Bay 

Post#302 » by Balls2TheWalls » Tue Sep 29, 2015 4:15 am

crkone wrote:
Kerb Hohl wrote:Did Shields come back? I was driving for most of the last 5 min or so.

Yeah I think so.


I think he only went down in hopes of getting them to bring the chains out for the measurement on one of the quickest first down decisions after one of the worst spots I've ever seen.
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 15,858
And1: 6,954
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Game 3: Kansas City at Green Bay 

Post#303 » by FAH1223 » Tue Sep 29, 2015 4:17 am

Kerb Hohl wrote:Did Shields come back? I was driving for most of the last 5 min or so.


Yeah, he was just shaken up
Image
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 110,797
And1: 26,283
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: RE: Re: Game 3: Kansas City at Green Bay 

Post#304 » by trwi7 » Tue Sep 29, 2015 4:17 am

Balls2TheWalls wrote:
crkone wrote:
Kerb Hohl wrote:Did Shields come back? I was driving for most of the last 5 min or so.

Yeah I think so.


I think he only went down in hopes of getting them to bring the chains out for the measurement on one of the quickest first down decisions after one of the worst spots I've ever seen.


They really should hire two additional refs for each side of the field whose sole job is to stand by the 1st down marker and spot the ball on plays like that.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 59,985
And1: 36,359
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Game 3: Kansas City at Green Bay 

Post#305 » by emunney » Tue Sep 29, 2015 4:23 am

I was hoping to see people bitching about a week 3 game we dominated. Glad to not be disappointed.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
User avatar
crkone
RealGM
Posts: 28,534
And1: 9,313
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Re: Game 3: Kansas City at Green Bay 

Post#306 » by crkone » Tue Sep 29, 2015 4:23 am

I think Shields got a cleat to the balls.

Code: Select all

o- - -  \o          __|
   o/   /|          vv`\
  /|     |              |
   |    / \_            |
  / \   |               |
 /  |                   |
User avatar
Sky Bucks
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,661
And1: 1,357
Joined: Jan 05, 2014
Location: New Bizzle
       

Re: Game 3: Kansas City at Green Bay 

Post#307 » by Sky Bucks » Tue Sep 29, 2015 4:25 am

This injury is really getting old. Can we at least make it through 1 game without someone getting hurt and then out for multiple weeks.
#Make'em Believe On Wisconsin
User avatar
wichmae
RealGM
Posts: 16,726
And1: 1,031
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: Milwaukee

Re: Game 3: Kansas City at Green Bay 

Post#308 » by wichmae » Tue Sep 29, 2015 4:36 am

That was literally the biggest blowout under 2 score game Ive ever watched. I honestly didnt feel KC was EVER in that game. Even at the 4 min mark when they went for 2. Never honestly felt remotely close.
User avatar
thomchatt3rton
Head Coach
Posts: 6,386
And1: 2,228
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
 

Re: Game 3: Kansas City at Green Bay 

Post#309 » by thomchatt3rton » Tue Sep 29, 2015 4:37 am

Mags FTW wrote:Christ do we waste timeouts.


Right? What's up with this? My favorite was buring a TO before a punt earlier. Last week vs SEA we burned alot too. My only thought is that we've had so many in-game injuries, that the new guys aren't in place or something? IDK.
User avatar
DH34Phan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,627
And1: 113
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Contact:

Re: Game 3: Kansas City at Green Bay 

Post#310 » by DH34Phan » Tue Sep 29, 2015 4:46 am

I still want to know the reasoning Alex Smith was taken ahead of Rodgers in the draft. Rodgers going to SF made so much sense, I still can't believe they didn't take him.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 59,985
And1: 36,359
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Game 3: Kansas City at Green Bay 

Post#311 » by emunney » Tue Sep 29, 2015 4:47 am

:burger:

Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 59,985
And1: 36,359
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Game 3: Kansas City at Green Bay 

Post#312 » by emunney » Tue Sep 29, 2015 4:59 am

DH34Phan wrote:I still want to know the reasoning Alex Smith was taken ahead of Rodgers in the draft. Rodgers going to SF made so much sense, I still can't believe they didn't take him.


Trent Dilfer, David Carr, Akili Smith, Joey Harrington, Kyle Boller all preceded Rodgers as highly regarded Tedford QBs. I mean, I get it.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
User avatar
DH34Phan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,627
And1: 113
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Contact:

Re: Game 3: Kansas City at Green Bay 

Post#313 » by DH34Phan » Tue Sep 29, 2015 5:08 am

emunney wrote:
DH34Phan wrote:I still want to know the reasoning Alex Smith was taken ahead of Rodgers in the draft. Rodgers going to SF made so much sense, I still can't believe they didn't take him.


Trent Dilfer, David Carr, Akili Smith, Joey Harrington, Kyle Boller all preceded Rodgers as highly regarded Tedford QBs. I mean, I get it.

That's actually a pretty good reason to be skeptical about Rodgers.

I think Alex Smith benefited from being a weak conference and they ran a pretty gimmicky offense at Utah. He seemed like as much of question mark as Rodgers going into the draft.

With Rodgers being a 49ers fan from Northern California, to starring at Cal, it just seemed like picking Rodgers would have been a logical move.
HKPackFan
RealGM
Posts: 14,635
And1: 10,091
Joined: Jan 14, 2014
Location: Hong Kong
   

Re: RE: Re: Game 3: Kansas City at Green Bay 

Post#314 » by HKPackFan » Tue Sep 29, 2015 5:18 am

emunney wrote:
DH34Phan wrote:I still want to know the reasoning Alex Smith was taken ahead of Rodgers in the draft. Rodgers going to SF made so much sense, I still can't believe they didn't take him.


Trent Dilfer, David Carr, Akili Smith, Joey Harrington, Kyle Boller all preceded Rodgers as highly regarded Tedford QBs. I mean, I get it.


He used to throw the ball from his ear! So awkward!!!!
#FreeChuckDiesel
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 8,086
And1: 4,126
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: RE: Re: Game 3: Kansas City at Green Bay 

Post#315 » by RRyder823 » Tue Sep 29, 2015 5:51 am

emunney wrote:I was hoping to see people bitching about a week 3 game we dominated. Glad to not be disappointed.


Lol right. Teams score in the final quarters of games all the freaking time in games when the outcome was never in doubt but the game was never that close. It's like half the people here didn't even watch the game and are only checking the box score......

The Seattle game really messed up people's percpectives in these types of games. It was a collapse of EPIC proportions. Not the norm
User avatar
LikeABosh
RealGM
Posts: 18,886
And1: 8,632
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
     

Re: RE: Re: Game 3: Kansas City at Green Bay 

Post#316 » by LikeABosh » Tue Sep 29, 2015 6:18 am

Balls2TheWalls wrote:
crkone wrote:
Kerb Hohl wrote:Did Shields come back? I was driving for most of the last 5 min or so.

Yeah I think so.


I think he only went down in hopes of getting them to bring the chains out for the measurement on one of the quickest first down decisions after one of the worst spots I've ever seen.


I just don't understand why they wouldn't do that anyway. It wasn't like they spotted it a yard or 2 past the marker. It was right on the marker and they just assumed it was a first down?
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,544
And1: 1,324
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

Re: RE: Re: Game 3: Kansas City at Green Bay 

Post#317 » by El Duderino » Tue Sep 29, 2015 6:21 am

HKPackFan wrote:
emunney wrote:
DH34Phan wrote:I still want to know the reasoning Alex Smith was taken ahead of Rodgers in the draft. Rodgers going to SF made so much sense, I still can't believe they didn't take him.


Trent Dilfer, David Carr, Akili Smith, Joey Harrington, Kyle Boller all preceded Rodgers as highly regarded Tedford QBs. I mean, I get it.


He used to throw the ball from his ear! So awkward!!!!


Yea, that's why sitting for a few years helped Rodgers a lot. He and McCarthy completely tore apart the throwing mechanics he left college with compared with how he' thrown since becoming the starting QB.

Had SF drafting him and thus he was expected to start from day one, maybe he never spends the time breaking down those throwing mechanics which Tedford taught holding the ball up by his ear.
User avatar
DH34Phan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,627
And1: 113
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Contact:

Re: Game 3: Kansas City at Green Bay 

Post#318 » by DH34Phan » Tue Sep 29, 2015 7:04 am

I never thought I'd see a guy from UW-Milwaukee play in the NFL :o .

http://www.kcchiefs.com/team/roster/demetrius-harris/633d666a-aa4c-4f6f-b8ae-2761963578f2/

Good luck Demetrius Harris. Watching college basketball players switch to football is always interesting to me.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 92,100
And1: 44,779
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Game 3: Kansas City at Green Bay 

Post#319 » by MickeyDavis » Tue Sep 29, 2015 11:59 am

I didn't notice Jake Ryan getting hurt. That sucks, I wanted to see what he could do.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
Outlander
Junior
Posts: 313
And1: 68
Joined: Feb 14, 2014

Re: Game 3: Kansas City at Green Bay 

Post#320 » by Outlander » Tue Sep 29, 2015 12:57 pm

It is not just the Packers but time outs, especially in the second half, are worth more than 5 yards. If something looks wrong before punting don't take the timeout, take the 5 yard penalty. Same goes for most timeouts taken by Rodgers when the clock is running down, they should take the five yard loss most of the time over a time out. It hurts the team when they can't challenge something or when they really need to stop the clock at the end of the game.

Return to Green Bay Packers


cron