ImageImage

ATL: Week 4

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 17,036
And1: 2,850
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: ATL: Week 4 

Post#61 » by BUCKnation » Tue Oct 6, 2015 3:29 am

Cant blame Calvin on that one, literally another foot and they are up. He probably would have scored without the stretch, which is the unfortunate thing.

Seahawks pull some voodoo s*** every time on MNF.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 59,985
And1: 36,359
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: ATL: Week 4 

Post#62 » by emunney » Tue Oct 6, 2015 3:29 am

Had to go right after. Tell me they interviewed Tate.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 25,536
And1: 13,004
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: Bobby!! Bobby!! Bobby!!
     

Re: ATL: Week 4 

Post#63 » by rilamann » Tue Oct 6, 2015 3:32 am

After some thought,was that more of the Seahawks usual bs luck or was it just the Lions being the Lions? lol.

Would have rather seen the Seahawks lose but the Lions loss brings the Packers possibility of winning the division before thanksgiving one more step closer to reality haha.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 34,430
And1: 4,141
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

ATL: Week 4 

Post#64 » by Kerb Hohl » Tue Oct 6, 2015 3:32 am

BUCKnation wrote:Cant blame Calvin on that one, literally another foot and they are up. He probably would have scored without the stretch, which is the unfortunate thing.

Seahawks pull some voodoo s*** every time on MNF.


I'm in the minority. I blame him (a little bit).

I know I'm on the couch and he probably couldn't calculate this in .01 seconds, but why even leave the ball vulnerable near the endzone when you will get 4 more plays to punch it in.

He was about to reach it out. I guess I've been on teams that have lost a game at the end due to this, but I cringe every time a guy reaches over the goal-line in a crowd unless it's 4th down or with 5 seconds left or you're clearly on the sideline and have room.
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 25,536
And1: 13,004
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: Bobby!! Bobby!! Bobby!!
     

Re: ATL: Week 4 

Post#65 » by rilamann » Tue Oct 6, 2015 3:36 am

Megatron can add this one to his not completing the catch incident vs the Bears week 1 back in 2010...lol.

Sometimes guys like Calvin Johnson and Dez Bryant seem too athletic for their own good,it's like they try to go for the spectacular and it costs them.Like if Dez doesn't try to stretch for the goal line vs us in the playoffs he easily completes that catch at that 1.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
GB_Packers
Head Coach
Posts: 6,426
And1: 1,248
Joined: Sep 09, 2013

Re: ATL: Week 4 

Post#66 » by GB_Packers » Tue Oct 6, 2015 3:38 am

Seattle benefits from yet another missed call. It's just comical at this point.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 15,858
And1: 6,954
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: ATL: Week 4 

Post#67 » by FAH1223 » Tue Oct 6, 2015 3:38 am

So apparently KJ Wright's bat of the ball in the end zone was illegal after Megatron fumbled.

Should have been 1st and Goal for the Lions.

Shid.
Image
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 32,442
And1: 9,789
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: ATL: Week 4 

Post#68 » by Turk Nowitzki » Tue Oct 6, 2015 3:39 am

I still can't believe they missed the illegal batting of the ball. Is that reviewable because that play should've been automatically reviewed, no? How does Seattle always get away with this stuff?
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 34,430
And1: 4,141
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: ATL: Week 4 

Post#69 » by Kerb Hohl » Tue Oct 6, 2015 3:40 am

Turk Nowitzki wrote:I still can't believe they missed the illegal batting of the ball. Is that reviewable because that play should've been automatically reviewed, no? How does Seattle always get away with this stuff?

Batting of the ball is a judgment call.

I was wondering if they'd call it when he did that. Ugh.
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 17,036
And1: 2,850
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: ATL: Week 4 

Post#70 » by BUCKnation » Tue Oct 6, 2015 3:47 am

Didn't know that was a rule, good lord. Never play in Seattle on MNF.
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,544
And1: 1,324
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

Re: ATL: Week 4 

Post#71 » by El Duderino » Tue Oct 6, 2015 3:48 am

Turk Nowitzki wrote:I still can't believe they missed the illegal batting of the ball. Is that reviewable because that play should've been automatically reviewed, no? How does Seattle always get away with this stuff?


Obviously none of the Detroit coaches knew the rule either given nobody on their sideline was throwing a fit.

Pretty strange that among all of that coaching staff, nobody yelled to Caldwell about the rule. You would think at least somebody on their staff would have saw the play, knew the rule, and started screaming.
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 22,829
And1: 9,347
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: ATL: Week 4 

Post#72 » by M-C-G » Tue Oct 6, 2015 3:51 am

So there was a third and long draw to Rawls where I focused in on Graham's "blocking"...I actually started a vine account just to post it because it was so laughable but ran out of patience trying to get it loaded. That guy is a grade A turd.
Buck Dweller
Starter
Posts: 2,324
And1: 988
Joined: Mar 04, 2015
   

Re: ATL: Week 4 

Post#73 » by Buck Dweller » Tue Oct 6, 2015 3:58 am

Here we **** go again with NFL controversy.
GB_Packers
Head Coach
Posts: 6,426
And1: 1,248
Joined: Sep 09, 2013

Re: ATL: Week 4 

Post#74 » by GB_Packers » Tue Oct 6, 2015 4:20 am

The back judge felt it wasn't overt. Nothing to see here, carry on. They will issue a statement saying sorry probably tomorrow morning and that will be that.
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 22,301
And1: 23,309
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: ATL: Week 4 

Post#75 » by Ron Swanson » Tue Oct 6, 2015 4:24 am

The Seahawks are in trouble whenever Marshawn eventually breaks down. That offense looks downright inept without him.
User avatar
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 34,443
And1: 7,253
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: ATL: Week 4 

Post#76 » by Mags FTW » Tue Oct 6, 2015 5:03 am

So after 1 game of true action, Stefon Diggs is Antonio Brown now.

https://www.reddit.com/r/minnesotavikings/comments/3nm1yd/diggs_should_be_starting_now/
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 8,086
And1: 4,126
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: RE: Re: ATL: Week 4 

Post#77 » by RRyder823 » Tue Oct 6, 2015 5:13 am

Mags FTW wrote:So after 1 game of true action, Stefon Diggs is Antonio Brown now.

https://www.reddit.com/r/minnesotavikings/comments/3nm1yd/diggs_should_be_starting_now/


Well your first mistake was going on Reddit.... Nothing but stupid people there.

The second mistake was checking out the Vikings posts on Reddit.... Two wrongs only make things worse.
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 8,086
And1: 4,126
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: RE: Re: ATL: Week 4 

Post#78 » by RRyder823 » Tue Oct 6, 2015 5:15 am

Ron Swanson wrote:The Seahawks are in trouble whenever Marshawn eventually breaks down. That offense looks downright inept without him.


Things everybody but Seahawks fans have been saying for the last 2 years for 500 Alex.....
GB_Packers
Head Coach
Posts: 6,426
And1: 1,248
Joined: Sep 09, 2013

Re: ATL: Week 4 

Post#79 » by GB_Packers » Tue Oct 6, 2015 6:00 am

Wouldn't surprise me if Lynchs body is starting to break down already. The hamstring injury could linger for awhile and Rawls is a decent rookie but teams won't fear him much, especially with that dreadful OL. Would have been nice to see them fall to 1-3 and then have to go on the road this Sunday into Cincinnati.
User avatar
sidney lanier
Head Coach
Posts: 6,876
And1: 9,888
Joined: Feb 03, 2012
Location: where late the sweet birds sang

Re: ATL: Week 4 

Post#80 » by sidney lanier » Tue Oct 6, 2015 12:57 pm

GB_Packers wrote:The back judge felt it wasn't overt. Nothing to see here, carry on. They will issue a statement saying sorry probably tomorrow morning and that will be that.


Actually the NFL rules guy was already calling in to NFL TV last night with the first of the mea culpas (or, for those who know Latin grammar better than the back judge knows NFL rules, meae culpae). But you're right -- there will be a letter, the Lions will have a ritual burning of the letter, and that will be that. Frontier justice in the NFL, and that magic Seattle end zone flips another game.
"The Bucks in six always. That's for the culture." -- B. Jennings

Return to Green Bay Packers