ImageImage

Game 5: Rams at Pack - Noon - CBS

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 110,797
And1: 26,283
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Game 5: Rams at Pack - Noon - CBS 

Post#461 » by trwi7 » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:15 pm

Kirk Cousins sucks.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
crkone
RealGM
Posts: 28,534
And1: 9,313
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Re: Game 5: Rams at Pack - Noon - CBS 

Post#462 » by crkone » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:15 pm

Rollins!

Code: Select all

o- - -  \o          __|
   o/   /|          vv`\
  /|     |              |
   |    / \_            |
  / \   |               |
 /  |                   |
User avatar
chuckleslove
RealGM
Posts: 18,566
And1: 1,128
Joined: Nov 17, 2009
Location: In an RV down by the river
Contact:
     

Re: Game 5: Rams at Pack - Noon - CBS 

Post#463 » by chuckleslove » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:15 pm

Rollins!
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 57,975
And1: 13,712
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: Game 5: Rams at Pack - Noon - CBS 

Post#464 » by Ayt » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:15 pm

Rolly
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 110,797
And1: 26,283
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Game 5: Rams at Pack - Noon - CBS 

Post#465 » by trwi7 » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:15 pm

LOL Foles.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
WiscoKing13
RealGM
Posts: 11,694
And1: 1,270
Joined: Jan 03, 2009
     

Re: Game 5: Rams at Pack - Noon - CBS 

Post#466 » by WiscoKing13 » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:15 pm

So Goodson was active 2 times over Rollins for ST and rollins gets 2 picks today and goodson **** up on ST.
DanoMac wrote:
bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.


I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 32,442
And1: 9,789
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: Game 5: Rams at Pack - Noon - CBS 

Post#467 » by Turk Nowitzki » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:16 pm

What a disaster of a game by both offenses.
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 30,351
And1: 13,869
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: Game 5: Rams at Pack - Noon - CBS 

Post#468 » by humanrefutation » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:16 pm

Rollins!
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 57,975
And1: 13,712
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: Game 5: Rams at Pack - Noon - CBS 

Post#469 » by Ayt » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:16 pm

WiscoKing13 wrote:So Goodson was active 2 times over Rollins for ST and rollins gets 2 picks today and goodson **** up on ST.


Rollins probably doesn't even get snaps if Burnett is healthy. He's only playing because Hyde is playing safety.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 110,797
And1: 26,283
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Game 5: Rams at Pack - Noon - CBS 

Post#470 » by trwi7 » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:18 pm

Gonna call Rollins Rollie's because that's the name of an awesome market in Two Rivers.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
MartyConlonOnTheRun
RealGM
Posts: 24,486
And1: 10,781
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6

Re: Game 5: Rams at Pack - Noon - CBS 

Post#471 » by MartyConlonOnTheRun » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:18 pm

Siefer wrote:The last two weeks have been incredibly ugly.

Ugly but we confidently won by 2 scores while giving up a combined 13 points. I'll take ugly every week.
WiscoKing13
RealGM
Posts: 11,694
And1: 1,270
Joined: Jan 03, 2009
     

Re: Game 5: Rams at Pack - Noon - CBS 

Post#472 » by WiscoKing13 » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:22 pm

Ayt wrote:
WiscoKing13 wrote:So Goodson was active 2 times over Rollins for ST and rollins gets 2 picks today and goodson **** up on ST.


Rollins probably doesn't even get snaps if Burnett is healthy. He's only playing because Hyde is playing safety.

Which is awful, because hyde can't cover slot WR and most TE's
DanoMac wrote:
bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.


I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 92,100
And1: 44,779
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Game 5: Rams at Pack - Noon - CBS 

Post#473 » by MickeyDavis » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:33 pm

Terrible offense and win by 14. I'll take it
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 15,858
And1: 6,954
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Game 5: Rams at Pack - Noon - CBS 

Post#474 » by FAH1223 » Sun Oct 11, 2015 8:38 pm

trwi7 wrote:Kirk Cousins sucks.


ATL is gonna get home field so easily. Ugh.
Image
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 8,086
And1: 4,126
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: RE: Re: Game 5: Rams at Pack - Noon - CBS 

Post#475 » by RRyder823 » Mon Oct 12, 2015 8:00 am

FAH1223 wrote:
trwi7 wrote:Kirk Cousins sucks.


ATL is gonna get home field so easily. Ugh.


They need OT to take out Washington and people still think they're just going to roll through their schedule? Really?

That's a team that could just as likely be 1-4 as 5-0. They have no easy games no matter who they're playing cause they're not that good. Eventually all these close games and comebacks won't go there way
User avatar
chuckleslove
RealGM
Posts: 18,566
And1: 1,128
Joined: Nov 17, 2009
Location: In an RV down by the river
Contact:
     

Re: RE: Re: Game 5: Rams at Pack - Noon - CBS 

Post#476 » by chuckleslove » Mon Oct 12, 2015 1:37 pm

RRyder823 wrote:
FAH1223 wrote:
trwi7 wrote:Kirk Cousins sucks.


ATL is gonna get home field so easily. Ugh.


They need OT to take out Washington and people still think they're just going to roll through their schedule? Really?

That's a team that could just as likely be 1-4 as 5-0. They have no easy games no matter who they're playing cause they're not that good. Eventually all these close games and comebacks won't go there way



Even if they do, in 2010 they had a similar schedule and a lot of close wins and then we rolled them in the playoffs.

http://www.nfl.com/schedules/2010/REG/FALCONS
I'm dealing with cancer, it sucks, can follow along for updates if that's your thing: Chuck's cancer Go Fund Me page

Return to Green Bay Packers