Postgame: Rams at Packers
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation
Postgame: Rams at Packers
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 110,797
- And1: 26,283
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
Postgame: Rams at Packers
Defense won this game. Offense has a ton to work on.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
- Mags FTW
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,443
- And1: 7,253
- Joined: Feb 16, 2006
- Location: Flickin' It
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
Offense needs to settle down. I think they fell in love with with drawing teams offside and catching them with 12 on the field. Get back to basics please.
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
- Turk Nowitzki
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,442
- And1: 9,789
- Joined: Feb 26, 2010
- Location: on the Hellmouth
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
Ugly win, good news that is that pretty much everyone in the league is playing ugly football right now.
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
- MartyConlonOnTheRun
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,484
- And1: 10,780
- Joined: Jun 27, 2006
- Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
Rodger and Lacy had their worst games in a few years and we still won by 2 TDs. I'm taking that as a good sign. Rodgers won't through 2 INTs for at least another 6 games
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,584
- And1: 2,701
- Joined: Jan 24, 2006
- Location: 414
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
Seems like the injuries are catching up to the offense. Almost all key players are either missing or banged up.
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 57,975
- And1: 13,712
- Joined: Jun 27, 2005
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
Mags FTW wrote:Offense needs to settle down. I think they fell in love with with drawing teams offside and catching them with 12 on the field. Get back to basics please.
We just lack players at WR and TE right now. Hopefully we get Adams back soon. We need a guy like him on the outside who can actually make some plays down the field.
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
- FAH1223
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,857
- And1: 6,954
- Joined: Nov 01, 2005
- Location: Laurel, MD
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
ACGB wrote:Seems like the injuries are catching up to the offense. Almost all key players are either missing or banged up.
Bulaga played pretty good in his return, thought he would need another couple weeks
Lang's injury is the most concerning.
And our WR situation would be so bad if #89 wasn't there. Man. It's also telling that the coaches have no confidence in either #83 or #84 on offense. We could use one of them.
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,694
- And1: 1,270
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
I forgot who tweeted it, but without Jordy the pack need to look at the Pats play calling. They've been working without a deep threat since moss left and their offense never looked like this.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,694
- And1: 1,270
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
FAH1223 wrote:
Lang's injury is the most concerning.
It sucks and we'd much rather have Lang but this roster has plenty of quality options at OG compared to what have at OT.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,694
- And1: 1,270
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
Also how about not going for it on 4th and 1? By some miracle they don't block the kick and then get a 60 yard pass play that we save with a shoe string tackle. Why not just go for it and if we miss they still have to get 11 points.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
- LikeABosh
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,886
- And1: 8,632
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
Loved the defense in this game. Foles only had like 60 yards passing or something? Awesome
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
- MartyConlonOnTheRun
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,484
- And1: 10,780
- Joined: Jun 27, 2006
- Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
WiscoKing13 wrote:Also how about not going for it on 4th and 1? By some miracle they don't block the kick and then get a 60 yard pass play that we save with a shoe string tackle. Why not just go for it and if we miss they still have to get 11 points.
Versus not making it and the Rams throwing a 60 yard pass play that we save with a shoe string tackle and only being up by a FG?
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,694
- And1: 1,270
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
Interested to hear if the NFL says anything about the INT that was clearly trapped and wasn't reviewed. That was a bunch of ****.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,694
- And1: 1,270
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:WiscoKing13 wrote:Also how about not going for it on 4th and 1? By some miracle they don't block the kick and then get a 60 yard pass play that we save with a shoe string tackle. Why not just go for it and if we miss they still have to get 11 points.
Versus not making it and the Rams throwing a 60 yard pass play that we save with a shoe string tackle and only being up by a FG?
More things can go wrong on a FG kick that nets you almost nothing versus a 4th and 1.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
- humanrefutation
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 30,351
- And1: 13,869
- Joined: Jun 05, 2006
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
Pass rush was outstanding today. Really forced the Foles to make some rushed throws and picks.
The offense is struggling, clearly. Guys just are not getting separation even with Rodgers having time in the pocket. I imagine that losing Lang for a significant period of time will hamper our running game as well.
Hopefully, getting Adams back will make a difference there, but we're really really missing Jordy.
The offense is struggling, clearly. Guys just are not getting separation even with Rodgers having time in the pocket. I imagine that losing Lang for a significant period of time will hamper our running game as well.
Hopefully, getting Adams back will make a difference there, but we're really really missing Jordy.
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
- DH34Phan
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,627
- And1: 113
- Joined: Jun 30, 2005
- Contact:
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
Nice to see the young guys in the secondary have great games. Clinton-Dix, Rollins, and Randall are looking very good.
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,694
- And1: 1,270
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
Looking at the rest of the schedule, how the hell did we get 4 west cost trips in one year? Hate how the year ends we go to OAK and then have to go to AZ. That AZ game could be huge.
Also 4 straight division games after CAR, there has to be a let down in one of those.
Also 4 straight division games after CAR, there has to be a let down in one of those.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Postgame: Rams at Packers
- thomchatt3rton
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,386
- And1: 2,228
- Joined: Jun 11, 2009
Postgame: Rams at Packers
WiscoKing13 wrote:I forgot who tweeted it, but without Jordy the pack need to look at the Pats play calling. They've been working without a deep threat since moss left and their offense never looked like this.
Totally agree. Tho Pats do have gronk, which really helps open things up for the edelmans of the world. But yeah.
I thought the KC game was the dawning of a new era in tailor-made offensive game-planning w all the short, quick passes but I guess it was just crappy CB by the chiefs.
Injuries obviously really affecting what GB wants to do tho, and Clements etc havent caught up to gameplanning for a vastly depleted, 1TE-havin' receiving corps.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,121
- And1: 6,360
- Joined: Jun 29, 2005
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
Unbelievable day:
Driving up to Packer game, car died, need new transmission. Missed the game. Get home, get blown out in fantasy football and lose Jamaal Charles for the year. UGH!
For years I have been trying to acquire Jamaal Charles and see a Packer regular season game. What terrible luck.
Driving up to Packer game, car died, need new transmission. Missed the game. Get home, get blown out in fantasy football and lose Jamaal Charles for the year. UGH!
For years I have been trying to acquire Jamaal Charles and see a Packer regular season game. What terrible luck.
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
- DigitalFool
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,556
- And1: 138
- Joined: Jul 13, 2006
Re: Postgame: Rams at Packers
My wife is very casual Packer fan and I went I let out a groan with the first INT, she said what happened? I said Favre just threw an interception. She's like Favre? Oops...yeah spoiled with Rodgers at QB.
That said, the silver lining is we don't have to hear about the home streak anymore. It was getting obnoxious.
That said, the silver lining is we don't have to hear about the home streak anymore. It was getting obnoxious.