Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow
Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
-
- Cold Hard Gameday Facts
- Posts: 15,519
- And1: 8,942
- Joined: Jun 15, 2008
- Location: France
Re: Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,259
- And1: 3,930
- Joined: May 11, 2002
- Location: Just outside of No where.
Re: Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
So let me get this straight Rubio jumps into the back of Dieng and It's a foul on Teague who didn't even touch him?
Re: Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,918
- And1: 1,461
- Joined: Jun 26, 2014
Re: Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
basketballwacko2 wrote:So let me get this straight Rubio jumps into the back of Dieng and It's a foul on Teague who didn't even touch him?
incorrect
Re: Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,259
- And1: 3,930
- Joined: May 11, 2002
- Location: Just outside of No where.
Re: Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
That's it we might as well fold the team! We get ZERO respect from these idiot Refs!!
Re: Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,259
- And1: 3,930
- Joined: May 11, 2002
- Location: Just outside of No where.
Re: Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
guest81 wrote:basketballwacko2 wrote:So let me get this straight Rubio jumps into the back of Dieng and It's a foul on Teague who didn't even touch him?
incorrect
What's incorrect the fact that this referee is blind and insane?
Re: Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,259
- And1: 3,930
- Joined: May 11, 2002
- Location: Just outside of No where.
Re: Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
I can't believe I wasted 2 hours and 39 min of my life watching that sack of walrus excrement.
Re: Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
- boomershadow
- Forum Mod - Pacers
- Posts: 5,367
- And1: 6,272
- Joined: Jul 14, 2014
- Location: Naptown
Re: Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
I think that was a makeup call for the ball that probably went out of bounds off Young but they didn't overturn it even after checking the replay. Still not cool.
Re: Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,918
- And1: 1,461
- Joined: Jun 26, 2014
Re: Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
basketballwacko2 wrote:guest81 wrote:basketballwacko2 wrote:So let me get this straight Rubio jumps into the back of Dieng and It's a foul on Teague who didn't even touch him?
incorrect
What's incorrect the fact that this referee is blind and insane?
Teague clear as day held down Rubio's arm.Ref was right there
Re: Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,259
- And1: 3,930
- Joined: May 11, 2002
- Location: Just outside of No where.
Re: Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
No point in playing the ____ game let's just forfeit the rest of the season and move the franchise to Mexico City.
Re: Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,259
- And1: 3,930
- Joined: May 11, 2002
- Location: Just outside of No where.
Re: Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
guest81 wrote:basketballwacko2 wrote:guest81 wrote:
incorrect
What's incorrect the fact that this referee is blind and insane?
Teague clear as day held down Rubio's arm.Ref was right there
Re: Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
- boomershadow
- Forum Mod - Pacers
- Posts: 5,367
- And1: 6,272
- Joined: Jul 14, 2014
- Location: Naptown
Re: Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
guest81 wrote:basketballwacko2 wrote:guest81 wrote:
incorrect
What's incorrect the fact that this referee is blind and insane?
Teague clear as day held down Rubio's arm.Ref was right there
The only contact I saw from Teague was way way before the shot. By the time Rubio was shooting there was literally another Wolves player between Teague and Rubio's wild flail.
Re: Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,259
- And1: 3,930
- Joined: May 11, 2002
- Location: Just outside of No where.
Re: Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
That should have been a turnover because any contact between Teague and Rubio was long before the shot, to give him 3 shots on that is sad and pathetic enough to make me stop watching basketball completely.
Re: Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
- boomershadow
- Forum Mod - Pacers
- Posts: 5,367
- And1: 6,272
- Joined: Jul 14, 2014
- Location: Naptown
Re: Game 74: Minnesota Timberwolves (28-44) @ Indiana Pacers (37-36) - 7:00 PM ET
basketballwacko2 wrote:That should have been a turnover because any contact between Teague and Rubio was long before the shot, to give him 3 shots on that is sad and pathetic enough to make me stop watching basketball completely.
It was a bad call and totally sucks, and I hate how the league rewards players for flopping and flailing around instead of putting the ball in the basket. Fact is, I'm not sure even our Blue Collar, Gold Swagger team could do well in today's league. Being physical and tough just isn't rewarded the way that flopping is. Much less how my beloved Davis Boys would do in today's climate.
But we shouldn't have put ourselves in a position where a bad call cost us the game. We had the lead, and we should've closed it out and didn't.