Why do we continue to play Richard Marshall?

Moderator: bwgood77

User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 93,755
And1: 57,461
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Why do we continue to play Richard Marshall? 

Post#1 » by bwgood77 » Fri Oct 24, 2014 9:06 pm

I mean we signed this corner in May...

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GKmkD1pUG0[/youtube]

And hopefully Steve Williams comes back just as insurance in case Flower or Wright go down, now that Verrett might be out for awhile.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 93,755
And1: 57,461
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Why do we continue to play Richard Marshall? 

Post#2 » by bwgood77 » Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:44 pm

Revived
RealGM
Posts: 34,561
And1: 19,420
Joined: Feb 17, 2011

Re: Why do we continue to play Richard Marshall? 

Post#3 » by Revived » Tue Oct 28, 2014 1:21 am

bwgood77 wrote:Thank God, we released him! http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... -marshall/

I didn't even like it when we signed him back. He wasn't good last year either. He's awful. There's a reason he's bounced around so much around the league. Terrible player who can't guard a lick.

They signed Richard Crawford I don't know if he'll be all that great but he sure can't be bad than Marshall.

You won't be missed Richard Marshall!
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 93,755
And1: 57,461
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Why do we continue to play Richard Marshall? 

Post#4 » by bwgood77 » Tue Oct 28, 2014 1:31 am

SF88 wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:Thank God, we released him! http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... -marshall/

I didn't even like it when we signed him back. He wasn't good last year either. He's awful. There's a reason he's bounced around so much around the league. Terrible player who can't guard a lick.

They signed Richard Crawford I don't know if he'll be all that great but he sure can't be bad than Marshall.

You won't be missed Richard Marshall!


I don't know anything about Crawford but it's so great they got rid of Marshall...you can't just let the same guy continue to cost you games...not if he isn't making game winning plays too.
Revived
RealGM
Posts: 34,561
And1: 19,420
Joined: Feb 17, 2011

Re: Why do we continue to play Richard Marshall? 

Post#5 » by Revived » Tue Oct 28, 2014 7:05 am

bwgood77 wrote:
SF88 wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:Thank God, we released him! http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... -marshall/

I didn't even like it when we signed him back. He wasn't good last year either. He's awful. There's a reason he's bounced around so much around the league. Terrible player who can't guard a lick.

They signed Richard Crawford I don't know if he'll be all that great but he sure can't be bad than Marshall.

You won't be missed Richard Marshall!


I don't know anything about Crawford but it's so great they got rid of Marshall...you can't just let the same guy continue to cost you games...not if he isn't making game winning plays too.

He's awful man. Idk about Crawford either but based on what I hear, I don't think he'll get much playing time anyway, will likely just be the dime CB/STs player.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 93,755
And1: 57,461
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Why do we continue to play Richard Marshall? 

Post#6 » by bwgood77 » Thu Oct 30, 2014 10:10 pm

SF88 wrote:He's awful man. Idk about Crawford either but based on what I hear, I don't think he'll get much playing time anyway, will likely just be the dime CB/STs player.


Flowers better stay healthy, because I guess Verrett has a torn labrum. http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/11791 ... t-shoulder
Revived
RealGM
Posts: 34,561
And1: 19,420
Joined: Feb 17, 2011

Re: Why do we continue to play Richard Marshall? 

Post#7 » by Revived » Sat Nov 1, 2014 11:48 pm

bwgood77 wrote:
SF88 wrote:He's awful man. Idk about Crawford either but based on what I hear, I don't think he'll get much playing time anyway, will likely just be the dime CB/STs player.


Flowers better stay healthy, because I guess Verrett has a torn labrum. http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/11791 ... t-shoulder

:o

Return to Los Angeles Chargers