Clemenza wrote:QRich3 wrote:og15 wrote:Check out the time on the ball tracking, Paul is just like every other guard in the league the past two seasons.
Yeah, also, Paul having the ball all that time (among a few other things) results in a top offense year after year, and turns unskilled players like DJ or Barnes into great offensive tools. None of those guys can do that. Not Curry, not Westbrook, not Lillard, not Conley and not Wall or Parker. Paul having the ball a lot is not even close to being a problem, it's more like one of the solutions.
Not necessarily. When CP3 is out Blake's game flourishes and he actually looks like a MVP candidate. The ball is moving around more, there's more fast breaks which are the easy buckets we need, and Blake, who has good handles, is creating and facilitating as well. Can't front I'm a Blake guy.. I'm a little biased and imo his game is better with out a ball dominate point guard.
Well I don't think you should have to be a Blake guy or a Paul guy, they're both REALLY important to what we do, and even though in seasons prior Paul was clearly more important to our offense than Blake, I don't think it's the case anymore, they're both similarly essential to us. But we had top 5 offenses both years before Doc got here, and Blake wasn't even close to the player he is now.
I'm not saying Blake can't lead a top offense, I'm saying Paul already proved he can, several times. He's the best game-manager of his generation (maybe of all time?), and as much as I love it when we run our offense through Blake, I don't think you have to play down Paul to highlight it. You're telling it like Paul overdribbling is detrimental to us. It's not, him making decisions and calling plays is one of our main strengths.
EDIT- just checked, and in those 18 games Paul missed last year, we played at a very similar pace we are playing right now (about 96 possessions a game), and a bit slower than we did the rest of last year (98). We did have one of the very best offenses in the league still, very similar to this year's offense (about 110 points per 100 possessions). So yeah, while we're really good playing through Blake, we're not significantly better than when Paul is dominating the ball. We've played very few minutes where only one of Paul and Blake was on the court this year, so I can't find any reliable info on those line ups. But I still doubt we're any better with Blake and without Paul like you suggest.