ImageImageImageImageImage

Official trade thread 2012-13

Moderators: Danny Darko, Slava, TyCobb, crazyeights, Kilroy

User avatar
Mirjalovic
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,354
And1: 881
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Forza Lazio & LA Lakers !
   

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13 

Post#286 » by Mirjalovic » Tue Dec 11, 2012 11:56 am

tugs wrote:earl gets me

Doormatt wrote:i see no reason for phoenix to do that. beasley and dudley might suck this year but at least one of them still have value to them.


yep, and it's Dudley (basing on recent performances from the 2, Jared's producing consistently). I'm actually sold on Beasley for Blake/Duhon and Ebanks.

if we could get Beasley for Blake/Duhon and Ebanks its a non brainer.
13/7/2015
One Love wrote:Randle has no length, limited moves, no touch, rebounds poorly & forces the ball inside. Randle is BUST


TheChosen wrote:Would put Lebron over Duncan..definitely when both careers are over. Kobe or Malone is a toss-up.
User avatar
EArl
RealGM
Posts: 41,626
And1: 7,673
Joined: Mar 14, 2012
Location: Santa Cruz
Contact:
   

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13 

Post#287 » by EArl » Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:20 pm

That would be a steal, but I wonder if Phoenix is in to doing us favors since they gave us Nash.
People live their lives bound by what they accept as correct and true. That's how they define "reality". But what does it mean to be "correct" or "true?" Merely vague concepts...
User avatar
Gek
RealGM
Posts: 37,498
And1: 1,461
Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Contact:
       

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13 

Post#288 » by Gek » Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:20 pm

I wonder if we could move Pau to Indiana. We could pick up David West (expiring I think), but other than some Sam Young D at SG, I'm not sure who we could realistically ask for back with Pau to make the salaries work.
#teamhermes
go pens - pirates - steelers - lakers
User avatar
pspot
General Manager
Posts: 9,750
And1: 189
Joined: Feb 24, 2005
       

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13 

Post#289 » by pspot » Tue Dec 11, 2012 2:28 pm

Kobe System wrote:
We are seeing that trade proposal for a million times now. We don't want Bargs. And hell no to Kleiza. Calderon is the only decent player that we are to received. If you wanna trade with us, Bargs/Jose/Ross should be the starting point.


would something around Jose for Hill and Duhon or Blake work?
nm
IamBBAnalysis
Junior
Posts: 376
And1: 27
Joined: Dec 09, 2012

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13 

Post#290 » by IamBBAnalysis » Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:15 pm

Mirjalovic wrote:
tugs wrote:earl gets me

Doormatt wrote:i see no reason for phoenix to do that. beasley and dudley might suck this year but at least one of them still have value to them.


yep, and it's Dudley (basing on recent performances from the 2, Jared's producing consistently). I'm actually sold on Beasley for Blake/Duhon and Ebanks.

if we could get Beasley for Blake/Duhon and Ebanks its a non brainer.


Its a no brainer as in you DON't do it! Beasley has negative value on the basketball court. He is a terrible defensive player and just a streaky jump shooter on offense...that holds the ball and stalls ball movement. A big NO! The Lakers need defenders...and players that move the ball. Every team that gets Beasley immediately wants him gone.
User avatar
Doormatt
RealGM
Posts: 17,002
And1: 1,797
Joined: Mar 07, 2011
   

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13 

Post#291 » by Doormatt » Tue Dec 11, 2012 6:00 pm

seriously why would we want beasley? what about the lakers makes you think he will be an effective player? our players cant even play with intensity and effort every night and you expect us to get beasley to do that? wtf team are you guys watching.
#doorgek
User avatar
Doormatt
RealGM
Posts: 17,002
And1: 1,797
Joined: Mar 07, 2011
   

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13 

Post#292 » by Doormatt » Tue Dec 11, 2012 6:00 pm

dudley on the other hand would be awesome, but again, i see no reason for the suns to trade him to us for trash.
#doorgek
User avatar
Mirjalovic
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,354
And1: 881
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Forza Lazio & LA Lakers !
   

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13 

Post#293 » by Mirjalovic » Wed Dec 12, 2012 1:18 pm

We almost had him back then if NBA allowed us to sign CP, i think he will flourish in a more mature team like the Lakers. Look at Blake, its doesnt matter if he plays or not, the Lakers still sucks, because since he injured , we cannot deal him atm. I dont wanna to argue though, we still can get better deals than Beasley, if we carefully wait & see the situation. Mitch has weakness, signing good/functional role players aint his strength, despite has ability to sign/trade stars. Should've cut Ebanks or another useless young guys who cannot produce in favour Pietrus.

Mitch can reedem that mistakes with Delonte West signing. Bipolar or not, hes our best bet on the bench, he can lead the 2nd unit together with Jamison & Hill. He will be our best creator from the bench.

Also, i think Lakers should be more patient with Pau, i heard Love slighty unhappy in Wolves, not like we can pull the trade easily, but Lakers could closely monitong the situation on there. Remember when Mitch turning down Bynum for Kidd trade ? Well, thats the turning point of Pau, Nash, Howard signing.
13/7/2015
One Love wrote:Randle has no length, limited moves, no touch, rebounds poorly & forces the ball inside. Randle is BUST


TheChosen wrote:Would put Lebron over Duncan..definitely when both careers are over. Kobe or Malone is a toss-up.
lazfa199
Rookie
Posts: 1,148
And1: 14
Joined: Nov 26, 2011

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13 

Post#294 » by lazfa199 » Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:53 pm

The suns have no reason to move Beasley 20 games into the new season when the whole team is struggling, and his contract doesn't hurt them because they still have cap space. But Beasley would do well in LA not because of the "veteran presence" but because of Norm Nixon. Also I do agree that hes playing poorly but hes also playing injured and has been moving the ball pretty well, just look at the game against the lakers he had 9 nice assists and could have had a couple more if the other players finished the play.
User avatar
ReadyOrlando
Pro Prospect
Posts: 791
And1: 7
Joined: Jul 06, 2004
Contact:
   

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13 

Post#295 » by ReadyOrlando » Wed Dec 12, 2012 4:22 pm

Question, would you guys consider trading Howard for Anderson Varejao? after watching last nights game, he seems like a better fit to D'Antoni's system.
Image
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 46,968
And1: 2,891
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13 

Post#296 » by dockingsched » Wed Dec 12, 2012 5:07 pm

:nonono:
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
Jimbacosystem
Ballboy
Posts: 33
And1: 2
Joined: Dec 11, 2012

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13 

Post#297 » by Jimbacosystem » Wed Dec 12, 2012 5:48 pm

Great news!!!!

Barg's is injured so it looks like the Lkakers FO has been saved from making another mistake :lol:
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 46,968
And1: 2,891
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13 

Post#298 » by dockingsched » Wed Dec 12, 2012 5:52 pm

what was it about the lakers player movement this off-season/season that made u think the FO needed to be saved from a bad trade?

was it the horrible bynum for howard trade that the lakers are surely regretting?
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
Michael Lucky
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,434
And1: 1,077
Joined: Jan 02, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
   

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13 

Post#299 » by Michael Lucky » Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:00 pm

dockingsched wrote::nonono:


well at least you can add that trade to your timeline. :lol:
Jimbacosystem
Ballboy
Posts: 33
And1: 2
Joined: Dec 11, 2012

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13 

Post#300 » by Jimbacosystem » Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:48 pm

dockingsched wrote:what was it about the lakers player movement this off-season/season that made u think the FO needed to be saved from a bad trade?

was it the horrible bynum for howard trade that the lakers are surely regretting?


i think you misunderstood my point... i said a "mistake" not a trade

as for what have they done poorly... everything other than nash and D12 quite frankly

they missed out on a TON of FA's who signed for the minimum elsewhere in order to maintain roster spots for 4 scrubs DJO, Ebanks, Morris, Sacre

how would the lakers be playing if those spots were held by

blatche, barbosa, Pietrus, West?

I use those guys simply as examples... there are TONS of other vets who signed for the minimum who could help

The real problem is we accumulated ZERO bench assets this offseason KNOWING we had no picks we could deal during the season to improve the team...

what if we had signed a blatche for the minimum... wouldn't that have made hill expendable in a trade?

If Mitch and Jim had taken the approach the Nets did with their bench then we wouldn't be playing scrubs major minutes right now.

Bottom line, the FO got lazy after the two trades... nothing more nothing less
User avatar
EArl
RealGM
Posts: 41,626
And1: 7,673
Joined: Mar 14, 2012
Location: Santa Cruz
Contact:
   

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13 

Post#301 » by EArl » Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:50 pm

4real wrote:Question, would you guys consider trading Howard for Anderson Varejao? after watching last nights game, he seems like a better fit to D'Antoni's system.

Show yourself out.
People live their lives bound by what they accept as correct and true. That's how they define "reality". But what does it mean to be "correct" or "true?" Merely vague concepts...
User avatar
TyCobb
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 30,806
And1: 3,376
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Location: Pitcher's Mound
   

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13 

Post#302 » by TyCobb » Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:54 pm

:lol:
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
User avatar
Jajwanda
General Manager
Posts: 8,611
And1: 105
Joined: Jun 01, 2007

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13 

Post#303 » by Jajwanda » Wed Dec 12, 2012 10:41 pm

Paul George is taking over that SF spot in Indiana. I would not be surprised to see Danny Granger moved. Perhaps a three-way deal where Granger and Hansbrough come to L.A. with Gasol going out for a SG.
User avatar
tugs
General Manager
Posts: 9,672
And1: 820
Joined: Jul 22, 2010

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13 

Post#304 » by tugs » Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:36 pm

George will slide back to 2 when Granger comes back. expendable players in that roster are Augustin, Green and probably Hansbrough.
User avatar
Doormatt
RealGM
Posts: 17,002
And1: 1,797
Joined: Mar 07, 2011
   

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13 

Post#305 » by Doormatt » Thu Dec 13, 2012 2:57 pm

DJ Augustin would be pretty awesome but i dont see them giving up on gerald green.
#doorgek

Return to Los Angeles Lakers