yardbarker

Official trade thread 2012-13

Moderators: Phil XI, SlavaMedvedenko, Danny Darko, tkb, Kilroy, TyCobb

ImageImageImageImageImage

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13

Postby Mirjalovic on Tue Dec 11, 2012 6:56 am

tugs wrote:earl gets me

Doormatt wrote:i see no reason for phoenix to do that. beasley and dudley might suck this year but at least one of them still have value to them.


yep, and it's Dudley (basing on recent performances from the 2, Jared's producing consistently). I'm actually sold on Beasley for Blake/Duhon and Ebanks.

if we could get Beasley for Blake/Duhon and Ebanks its a non brainer.
i'm not a native english speaker
harold lewis wrote:Tim "Penny" Hardaway 1991


soxfan2003 wrote:Wade was a top 8 player but he has never been a top 3 nba player

GrangerDanger wrote:Google Leonardo Messi. you get 9,650,000 hits.
User avatar
Mirjalovic
Rookie
 
Posts: 1130
And1: 14
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Forza Lazio & LA Lakers !

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13

Postby EArl on Tue Dec 11, 2012 7:20 am

That would be a steal, but I wonder if Phoenix is in to doing us favors since they gave us Nash.
Get In The Game :king:
Image
Revived: #teamhermes
User avatar
EArl
RealGM
 
Posts: 14294
And1: 794
Joined: Mar 14, 2012
Location: UCSC

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13

Postby Gek on Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:20 am

I wonder if we could move Pau to Indiana. We could pick up David West (expiring I think), but other than some Sam Young D at SG, I'm not sure who we could realistically ask for back with Pau to make the salaries work.
retired: #teamhermes
go pens - pirates - steelers - lakers
User avatar
Gek
RealGM
 
Posts: 37153
And1: 639
Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Location: Your Warning Level: [1], Go Lakers

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13

Postby pspot on Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:28 am

Kobe System wrote:
We are seeing that trade proposal for a million times now. We don't want Bargs. And hell no to Kleiza. Calderon is the only decent player that we are to received. If you wanna trade with us, Bargs/Jose/Ross should be the starting point.


would something around Jose for Hill and Duhon or Blake work?
nm
User avatar
pspot
General Manager
 
Posts: 9402
And1: 18
Joined: Feb 24, 2005

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13

Postby IamBBAnalysis on Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:15 pm

Mirjalovic wrote:
tugs wrote:earl gets me

Doormatt wrote:i see no reason for phoenix to do that. beasley and dudley might suck this year but at least one of them still have value to them.


yep, and it's Dudley (basing on recent performances from the 2, Jared's producing consistently). I'm actually sold on Beasley for Blake/Duhon and Ebanks.

if we could get Beasley for Blake/Duhon and Ebanks its a non brainer.


Its a no brainer as in you DON't do it! Beasley has negative value on the basketball court. He is a terrible defensive player and just a streaky jump shooter on offense...that holds the ball and stalls ball movement. A big NO! The Lakers need defenders...and players that move the ball. Every team that gets Beasley immediately wants him gone.
IamBBAnalysis
Sophomore
 
Posts: 241
And1: 5
Joined: Dec 9, 2012

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13

Postby Doormatt on Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:00 pm

seriously why would we want beasley? what about the lakers makes you think he will be an effective player? our players cant even play with intensity and effort every night and you expect us to get beasley to do that? wtf team are you guys watching.
#doorgek
User avatar
Doormatt
RealGM
 
Posts: 12515
And1: 322
Joined: Mar 7, 2011

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13

Postby Doormatt on Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:00 pm

dudley on the other hand would be awesome, but again, i see no reason for the suns to trade him to us for trash.
#doorgek
User avatar
Doormatt
RealGM
 
Posts: 12515
And1: 322
Joined: Mar 7, 2011

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13

Postby Mirjalovic on Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:18 am

We almost had him back then if NBA allowed us to sign CP, i think he will flourish in a more mature team like the Lakers. Look at Blake, its doesnt matter if he plays or not, the Lakers still sucks, because since he injured , we cannot deal him atm. I dont wanna to argue though, we still can get better deals than Beasley, if we carefully wait & see the situation. Mitch has weakness, signing good/functional role players aint his strength, despite has ability to sign/trade stars. Should've cut Ebanks or another useless young guys who cannot produce in favour Pietrus.

Mitch can reedem that mistakes with Delonte West signing. Bipolar or not, hes our best bet on the bench, he can lead the 2nd unit together with Jamison & Hill. He will be our best creator from the bench.

Also, i think Lakers should be more patient with Pau, i heard Love slighty unhappy in Wolves, not like we can pull the trade easily, but Lakers could closely monitong the situation on there. Remember when Mitch turning down Bynum for Kidd trade ? Well, thats the turning point of Pau, Nash, Howard signing.
i'm not a native english speaker
harold lewis wrote:Tim "Penny" Hardaway 1991


soxfan2003 wrote:Wade was a top 8 player but he has never been a top 3 nba player

GrangerDanger wrote:Google Leonardo Messi. you get 9,650,000 hits.
User avatar
Mirjalovic
Rookie
 
Posts: 1130
And1: 14
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Forza Lazio & LA Lakers !

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13

Postby lazfa199 on Wed Dec 12, 2012 10:53 am

The suns have no reason to move Beasley 20 games into the new season when the whole team is struggling, and his contract doesn't hurt them because they still have cap space. But Beasley would do well in LA not because of the "veteran presence" but because of Norm Nixon. Also I do agree that hes playing poorly but hes also playing injured and has been moving the ball pretty well, just look at the game against the lakers he had 9 nice assists and could have had a couple more if the other players finished the play.
lazfa199
Rookie
 
Posts: 1139
And1: 7
Joined: Nov 26, 2011

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13

Postby 4real on Wed Dec 12, 2012 11:22 am

Question, would you guys consider trading Howard for Anderson Varejao? after watching last nights game, he seems like a better fit to D'Antoni's system.
4real
Senior
 
Posts: 741
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 5, 2004
Location: The Amway Center

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13

Postby dockingsched on Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:07 pm

:nonono:
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
 
Posts: 43729
And1: 389
Joined: Aug 2, 2005

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13

Postby Jimbacosystem on Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:48 pm

Great news!!!!

Barg's is injured so it looks like the Lkakers FO has been saved from making another mistake :lol:
Jimbacosystem
Ballboy
 
Posts: 33
And1: 2
Joined: Dec 10, 2012

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13

Postby dockingsched on Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:52 pm

what was it about the lakers player movement this off-season/season that made u think the FO needed to be saved from a bad trade?

was it the horrible bynum for howard trade that the lakers are surely regretting?
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
 
Posts: 43729
And1: 389
Joined: Aug 2, 2005

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13

Postby Michael Lucky on Wed Dec 12, 2012 1:00 pm

dockingsched wrote::nonono:


well at least you can add that trade to your timeline. :lol:
Michael Lucky
Starter
 
Posts: 2165
And1: 30
Joined: Jan 2, 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Official trade thread 2012-13

Postby Jimbacosystem on Wed Dec 12, 2012 1:48 pm

dockingsched wrote:what was it about the lakers player movement this off-season/season that made u think the FO needed to be saved from a bad trade?

was it the horrible bynum for howard trade that the lakers are surely regretting?


i think you misunderstood my point... i said a "mistake" not a trade

as for what have they done poorly... everything other than nash and D12 quite frankly

they missed out on a TON of FA's who signed for the minimum elsewhere in order to maintain roster spots for 4 scrubs DJO, Ebanks, Morris, Sacre

how would the lakers be playing if those spots were held by

blatche, barbosa, Pietrus, West?

I use those guys simply as examples... there are TONS of other vets who signed for the minimum who could help

The real problem is we accumulated ZERO bench assets this offseason KNOWING we had no picks we could deal during the season to improve the team...

what if we had signed a blatche for the minimum... wouldn't that have made hill expendable in a trade?

If Mitch and Jim had taken the approach the Nets did with their bench then we wouldn't be playing scrubs major minutes right now.

Bottom line, the FO got lazy after the two trades... nothing more nothing less
Jimbacosystem
Ballboy
 
Posts: 33
And1: 2
Joined: Dec 10, 2012

PreviousNext

Return to Los Angeles Lakers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ROballer, TGW