Page 1 of 1

Should the lakers sign Matt Carrol??

Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:35 am
by myersia
Just saw this on twitter from Marc Stein.
Word is Hornets & Matt Carroll working on buyout after CHA dealt Carroll for Hakim Warrick. Possible free-agent shooter for Lakers' radar?


This guy always killed us when we played the bobcats. Think he would be a legit shooter in Dantoni's system?

http://twitter.com/intent/user?screen_n ... NSteinLine

Re: Should the lakers sign Matt Carrol??

Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:50 am
by MensRea
No.

Re: Should the lakers sign Matt Carrol??

Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:51 am
by Gek
We should trade for Diop while we're at it. Maybe see if Vlad Rad wants to come back. While we're on top of it Smush looks like he needs work.

Re: Should the lakers sign Matt Carrol??

Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 3:15 am
by Compton310
hell no the point is to get younger an more athletic

Re: Should the lakers sign Matt Carrol??

Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 3:16 am
by Compton310
hell no the point is to get younger an more athletic

Re: Should the lakers sign Matt Carrol??

Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 3:19 am
by leeprettyp
I say Yes. With this Mike D. new offense why cant we use a great shooter

Re: Should the lakers sign Matt Carrol??

Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 3:22 am
by Baby Bop
give him a couple 10-day contracts

Re: Should the lakers sign Matt Carrol??

Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 3:49 am
by GAME TIME
@ESPNSteinLine

Word is Hornets & Matt Carroll working on buyout after CHA dealt Carroll for Hakim Warrick. Possible free-agent shooter for Lakers' radar?

@ESPNSteinLine

Raja Bell is a natural for D'Antoni Lakers to pursue but Bell still on Jazz roster. Lakes also have $100M payroll & full roster to cope with


:o

Re: Should the lakers sign Matt Carrol??

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 12:08 pm
by GoldKnightRises
Let's sign Bell as well, get the Suns back together >: D

Re: Should the lakers sign Matt Carrol??

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:01 pm
by Stebo_SSK
Why not just pick up Delonte West then? He's a high 30s 3pt shooter that provides playmaking and defense. Why should LA sign a guy that was struggling to get minutes on the Bobcats roster? Raja Bell really? He hasnt been a good role player in like 2 years and he is 36. There are other options including letting Meeks get his ish together before we go sign guys that are struggling to see time on lottery teams.

Re: Should the lakers sign Matt Carrol??

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:10 pm
by Jajwanda
They need Martell Webster, Quincy Pondexter, or Worell Wright. Another SG is useless.

Re: Should the lakers sign Matt Carrol??

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:12 am
by EArl
I wouldn't sign anyone that came from the Bobcats.
They are all Michael Jordan sleeper agents with the sole purpose of preventing Kobe from getting his sixth.

Re: Should the lakers sign Matt Carrol??

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 4:25 pm
by LApwnd
this is Blake 2.0 but 10x worse, as Carrol stinks at everything and pretty useless if he's not hitting his shots. This is Blake to a T, both these guys look like legit solid players when they played against us but once they sign here, pure garabage.