Edrees wrote:imagine if we had both hill and clark healthy. it would be hustleville
Hill probably won't see any playing time with Clark blowing up
Moderators: TyCobb, Danny Darko, Kilroy
Edrees wrote:imagine if we had both hill and clark healthy. it would be hustleville
Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing, Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before;
eablinksum wrote:We would probably trade gasol if we had Clark and Hill.
Slava wrote:I pulled a hammy while fapping. I won't make fun of Nash.
laduane1 wrote:6'10 and he hits 4 out of 5 three pointers. Just think if he got more playing time sooner, Lakers might have had more wins. Plus he is only 25 years old. Hope he is here for a long while.
LApwnd wrote:maybe he'll surprise us like Hill did and stay for a lil less, after all he's been on 2 teams now and neither one was condusive to his skills until now. He's still young enough if things do work out with Antoni for the long run, Clark, Howard, Hill can be a solid young/athletic front court for the forseable future.
Kilroy wrote:LApwnd wrote:maybe he'll surprise us like Hill did and stay for a lil less, after all he's been on 2 teams now and neither one was condusive to his skills until now. He's still young enough if things do work out with Antoni for the long run, Clark, Howard, Hill can be a solid young/athletic front court for the forseable future.
The thing is, if we're serious about cap room, it might have to be next to nothing...
Oddly, Clark's future might be directly tied to what happens with Pau even if he doesn't get traded with Pau. Because if we take on a long term contract with Pau, it might be more likely that we sign Clark long term too... If not, I just don't see us signing him to multi year contract even if he was willing to play for 5-6M a year. Which I highly doubt he would be.
Slava wrote:I pulled a hammy while fapping. I won't make fun of Nash.
ROballer wrote:^ Ariza got the MLE putting up worse numbers than Clark
Although he performed great in the playoffs ,where it counts,so I give him that..
But if Clark continues his solid play throughout the whole season,he'll get 4-5 mil a year at the very least from a team,that much I'm sure
His numbers since he became part of the rotation(12 games)
11,4 ppg
9,2 rpg
2,1 apg
0,9 bpg
50% FG ,61% 3P
All in 30,4 MPG
Slava wrote:I pulled a hammy while fapping. I won't make fun of Nash.
ROballer wrote:What did Green (Gerald)do besides scoring?Nada...
Clark plays D ,rebounds, surprinsingly good passer out of the post and he's even hitting his open shots and 3's(another surprise) at a decent clip(to say the least)...of course his 3P percentage won't last,but I'll be impressed even if he hit slightly better than half of what he's hitting now,considering the fact that he made 2 3's in his career before this season
And I gave you another example in Jeff Green
Clark's gonna get paid....
Kilroy wrote:He will be offered more than we think is reasonable and will go somewhere else.
Book it.
I'd love for him to stay but I just am not sure we want to invest in a player like him for the long run in this financial market.
In fact, as much as I don't want to see him go, it might make sense to try to trade him as an expiring.
OneWhoKnocks wrote:Any ridiculous trade scenario made up by a Laker fan may be one-upped by Mitch Kupchak in actuality. It's pretty scary.