ImageImageImageImageImage

Why not try the high screen pick and roll with nash and kobe

Moderators: TyCobb, Danny Darko, Kilroy

DubZzZzZ
Sophomore
Posts: 159
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 12, 2011

Re: Why not try the high screen pick and roll with nash and  

Post#16 » by DubZzZzZ » Mon Jan 7, 2013 1:48 pm

high pick and roll with a big and small moves a big out of the paint and gives either one of the two a speed or size advantage if the defender switches. If you run the pick and roll with 2 guards there is no advantage and either guard will be driving the paint with both big men defenders standing there..
TheKiteDesigner
Sophomore
Posts: 233
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 09, 2012

Re: Why not try the high screen pick and roll with nash and 

Post#17 » by TheKiteDesigner » Mon Jan 7, 2013 5:09 pm

GeneralNash wrote:Interesting stat....in the 2nd half Lakers had a stretch where they could not score a field goal in 9 minutes. Scream defense all you want...but if LA was able to score 8 points in those 9 minutes, la could of won.


Interesting stat...
Lakers
PPG 102.9 (5th out of 30)
Off Rtg 108.8 (6th out of 30)
Off efficiency 106.4 (6th out of 30)

Opposing PPG 100.8 (26th out of 30)
Defensive Rtg 106.6 (21st out of 30)
Def efficiency 103.2 (19th out of 30)

But you're right, it's an offensive problem.
IamBBAnalysis
Pro Prospect
Posts: 987
And1: 500
Joined: Dec 09, 2012

Re: Why not try the high screen pick and roll with nash and 

Post#18 » by IamBBAnalysis » Mon Jan 7, 2013 11:28 pm

TheKiteDesigner wrote:
GeneralNash wrote:Interesting stat....in the 2nd half Lakers had a stretch where they could not score a field goal in 9 minutes. Scream defense all you want...but if LA was able to score 8 points in those 9 minutes, la could of won.


Interesting stat...
Lakers
PPG 102.9 (5th out of 30)
Off Rtg 108.8 (6th out of 30)
Off efficiency 106.4 (6th out of 30)

Opposing PPG 100.8 (26th out of 30)
Defensive Rtg 106.6 (21st out of 30)
Def efficiency 103.2 (19th out of 30)

But you're right, it's an offensive problem.


Its definitely a defensive problem. However, he's completely right the Lakers are not getting enough out of the pick and roll. The Lakers should be the best team in the league on offense and they are not. And they should be an average or better team on defense and they are not. I see the above based on personnel and abilities.

Right now on offense Nash is not allowed to be super effective, either is Gasol or Howard. Its just not "quite right" with any of them. Although they are still very effective.
GeneralNash
Banned User
Posts: 666
And1: 13
Joined: Dec 23, 2012

Re: Why not try the high screen pick and roll with nash and 

Post#19 » by GeneralNash » Tue Jan 8, 2013 12:05 am

TheKiteDesigner wrote:
GeneralNash wrote:Interesting stat....in the 2nd half Lakers had a stretch where they could not score a field goal in 9 minutes. Scream defense all you want...but if LA was able to score 8 points in those 9 minutes, la could of won.


Interesting stat...
Lakers
PPG 102.9 (5th out of 30)
Off Rtg 108.8 (6th out of 30)
Off efficiency 106.4 (6th out of 30)

Opposing PPG 100.8 (26th out of 30)
Defensive Rtg 106.6 (21st out of 30)
Def efficiency 103.2 (19th out of 30)

But you're right, it's an offensive problem.


Never said it was an offensive problem. I am simply pointing out that the offense could be much better...and would allow this team to win games despite their horrid defense. Yes the defense is a problem as well. But this team would still be winning if they maximized their offensive potential.
rand0m
Junior
Posts: 300
And1: 25
Joined: Sep 20, 2007
Location: La La Land

Re: Why not try the high screen pick and roll with nash and  

Post#20 » by rand0m » Tue Jan 8, 2013 8:37 am

GeneralNash wrote:
TheKiteDesigner wrote:
GeneralNash wrote:Interesting stat....in the 2nd half Lakers had a stretch where they could not score a field goal in 9 minutes. Scream defense all you want...but if LA was able to score 8 points in those 9 minutes, la could of won.


Interesting stat...
Lakers
PPG 102.9 (5th out of 30)
Off Rtg 108.8 (6th out of 30)
Off efficiency 106.4 (6th out of 30)

Opposing PPG 100.8 (26th out of 30)
Defensive Rtg 106.6 (21st out of 30)
Def efficiency 103.2 (19th out of 30)

But you're right, it's an offensive problem.


Never said it was an offensive problem. I am simply pointing out that the offense could be much better...and would allow this team to win games despite their horrid defense. Yes the defense is a problem as well. But this team would still be winning if they maximized their offensive potential.


I agree with you here. Seems like an easier task to jump a few spots in offensive efficiency then defense. We just need a way to get wins at
this point.

Return to Los Angeles Lakers