lmao, my exact feelings. In this league where shooting is so important, especially from the guards, rondo just doesn't belongmcscotty wrote:I'd rather re-sign Lin than go with Rondo. No joke.
Sent from my GT-I9505G using RealGM Forums mobile app
Moderators: TyCobb, Danny Darko, Kilroy
lmao, my exact feelings. In this league where shooting is so important, especially from the guards, rondo just doesn't belongmcscotty wrote:I'd rather re-sign Lin than go with Rondo. No joke.
TwoStarz wrote:lmao, my exact feelings. In this league where shooting is so important, especially from the guards, rondo just doesn't belongmcscotty wrote:I'd rather re-sign Lin than go with Rondo. No joke.
Sent from my GT-I9505G using RealGM Forums mobile app
TyCobb wrote:You say Rajon, I say Rajon...
http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/ ... er=ya5nbcsTim MacMahon of ESPN:
The reality is Rondo’s run with the Mavs is extremely unlikely to extend past this season.
Ken Berger of CBSSports.com:
There are rumblings among rival front offices that Rondo might just be the personality type to forego a five-year deal with the Mavs for a four-year deal with the team of his choice — the Lakers.
Uhoh.
what would jack bauer do? wrote:Well Jason Kidd wasn't just "anything" he had a lot of basketball left in him at that point even if it wasn't at his superstar level. Dude produced at a very high level for four years after that. But yeah I agree with you and I wouldn't doubt that Kobe agrees with you too.
The question is if there's no Reggie Jackson and no Dragic available, the Lakers have to spend their money on someone in order to recruit Durant or whoever we're targeting, right? We can't just hang on to cap space this offseason, we need to be competitive next year to lure someone in. I don't think that guy will be Asik or Monroe (since he doesn't fit with randle) and we can't get Marc Gasol. So Rondo is pretty much all there is left out there. And in all reality Rondo is a player that compliments our terrible offense that Scott wants to run and our young players in Clarkson, Randle, Towns/Okafor well.
Pointgod wrote:I'd rather have Rondo at 8-12 million vs Dragic at 20 million. A lot of you posters don't seem to understand the concept of buying low. Yeah Rondo needs to be surrounded by shooters to be effective. You know who else is effective when surrounded by shooters? Kobe Muthafuvkcin Bryant! Milsap, Monta Ellis, Al Jefferson, Kyle Lowry are all examples of players who signed below their market value but were difference makers on their respective teams. It's time that the Lakers start getting some steals.
kblo247 wrote:We Pay a Lin 15 and we paid Nash 30 to do nothing. Rondo wouldn't hurt us. We are talking about the money some of you want to give to Ed Davis I mean. And his free throws are misleading, what's he attempted on the year .. 61? That's a week for a lot of guys. Case and pint Nick has taken almost 150 so far. It's not like teams are going to go hack him like DJ or Dwight
kblo247 wrote:Since when is a pick a sure thing? If we don't get rondo or Dragic, I think la goes calling for Jennings again tbh on his great deal.
ALL HAIL wrote:kblo247 wrote:Since when is a pick a sure thing? If we don't get rondo or Dragic, I think la goes calling for Jennings again tbh on his great deal.
I'm not a "let's depend on this young rookie" type of dude either, but, to be fair, he did say "almost".
I think you know what he's saying. Don't twist his words.