Are you implying that Russell has nothing to learn from Kobe (the facilitator) that will be of benefit?
If not, what are you saying exactly?
Is There a Point in Kobe?
Moderators: TyCobb, Danny Darko, Kilroy
Re: Is There a Point in Kobe?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,474
- And1: 1,213
- Joined: Dec 27, 2005
Re: Is There a Point in Kobe?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,639
- And1: 6,513
- Joined: Jan 02, 2012
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Re: Is There a Point in Kobe?
He'll be the facilitator for a few games until he goes back to doing what he always does. I have no interest in watching this team try something that everyone knows is doom to fail. Not to mention he's not a great facilitator to begin with when he does take on that role. He forces things way too much which is also something I don't want Russell to learn from.
Re: Is There a Point in Kobe?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,474
- And1: 1,213
- Joined: Dec 27, 2005
Re: Is There a Point in Kobe?
Michael Lucky wrote:He'll be the facilitator for a few games until he goes back to doing what he always does. I have no interest in watching this team try something that everyone knows is doom to fail. Not to mention he's not a great facilitator to begin with when he does take on that role. He forces things way too much which is also something I don't want Russell to learn from.
I suppose you'd rather someone jump out the stands and "Monica Seles" Kobe in the back of the knee?
As long as Kobe is unretired and unmaimed, this is the best role for him and the team's overall chemistry.
Do you have any ideas that are better, more realistic?
Let me guess, if you don't pray for him to get hurt, you probably want him to come off the bench or continue in his off-ball shooting role?
Re: Is There a Point in Kobe?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,446
- And1: 1,232
- Joined: May 20, 2014
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: Is There a Point in Kobe?
Kobe has a ton to offer the kids on the team, don't question that for a second...
you don't stay at the top of the NBA heap as a player for as long as Kobe did by accident or "natural talents " alone... even if he never spoke a single word to them just watching how he goes about his prep and approaches the game would be a better learning experience than they'd get otherwise. All they got to do is pay attention and listen to what he has to say and they'll be getting an education few young NBA players get
you don't stay at the top of the NBA heap as a player for as long as Kobe did by accident or "natural talents " alone... even if he never spoke a single word to them just watching how he goes about his prep and approaches the game would be a better learning experience than they'd get otherwise. All they got to do is pay attention and listen to what he has to say and they'll be getting an education few young NBA players get
Wife: "you haven't heard a single thing I said"
Me: that's a funny way to start a conversation...
Me: that's a funny way to start a conversation...
Re: Is There a Point in Kobe?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,639
- And1: 6,513
- Joined: Jan 02, 2012
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Re: Is There a Point in Kobe?
^
Yeah like his comments about how they are learning through his bricking of shots.
The idea of having young players learn from greats is good, if you completely ignore that players personality or mindset.
Yes in a perfect world he'd be retired already. In a perfect world with him playing he'd be a catch and shoot player not a let's increase his usage rate player like you're suggesting which would only make things worse and probably get him injured quicker.
Yeah like his comments about how they are learning through his bricking of shots.
The idea of having young players learn from greats is good, if you completely ignore that players personality or mindset.
ALL HAIL wrote:Michael Lucky wrote:He'll be the facilitator for a few games until he goes back to doing what he always does. I have no interest in watching this team try something that everyone knows is doom to fail. Not to mention he's not a great facilitator to begin with when he does take on that role. He forces things way too much which is also something I don't want Russell to learn from.
I suppose you'd rather someone jump out the stands and "Monica Seles" Kobe in the back of the knee?
As long as Kobe is unretired and unmaimed, this is the best role for him and the team's overall chemistry.
Do you have any ideas that are better, more realistic?
Let me guess, if you don't pray for him to get hurt, you probably want him to come off the bench or continue in his off-ball shooting role?
Yes in a perfect world he'd be retired already. In a perfect world with him playing he'd be a catch and shoot player not a let's increase his usage rate player like you're suggesting which would only make things worse and probably get him injured quicker.