miggs wrote:Kblo, you like me, seem to know very little about ncaa prospects. I find that I knew so little, man I wanted Thomas Robinson badly when he came in the league. I figured we needed a low post pf and I saw him as that based on what I READ and WATCHED, despite this, I notice I always miss details on prospects, details that sometimes have been the difference between bust or at least a role player.
I can tell because you have mudiay so high above okafor and towns, that tells me all I need to know.
Let me ask you, why do you like Mudiay? He almost literally appears in every one of your posts. I'd also like to know you're assessment on Winslow and Hezonja, because straight up, all those 3 names to me, look more like role players compared to okafor and towns. Russell we seem to agree on.
I followed them I just don't see anything impressive.
Okafor has no defensive intensity or awareness at all. He's a guy who can't defend the rim, close out, or react to pnr. He is pudgy and has weak hands. He doesnt grab boards by position or force but by being long. Half hearted Pau was tougher. I look at him and I see low budget al because those hooks he takes ve midgets lack the air Al has.he has some moves but he's not a dominant force, and he lacks range and free throw consitency. Not really liking him at all as a force; he's not a 1 or 2 option. He's not commanding a double, not anchoring a D; he's flawed
Towns isn't great at all, hell he's not great at the college level. He doesn't have touch or moves on the block. He settles for a jumper. He doesn't board a lot. He has no base. He isn't this amazing guy at all. To me he screams a cross between dalembert if he doesn't pan out and Ibaka if he does. Personally Ibaka isn't special to me, in fact it's barely a third guy on a contender, just look at the actual Ibaka who only defends on the help side and can't get you double digit boards or score from the post consistently right now; a guy who can't even defend the best opposing big straight up still. That doesn't excite me.
I see Russell and he fits in this open court scoring league. He can drop buckets. He to me screams baby Lillard in this league. He's fast, can score off a dribble, and has a quick step that can be dynamic alongside Clarkson
When I see Muiday I see a PG with better vision than anyone in these past two drafts, he has size, maintains his dribble, and can defend the 1 or 2. I see Livingston pre injury to be honest and as fifth pick he will kill it looking over the D and making the right play for us. I think he will be a good solid player for years to come like 15/9/5 a night. Speaks wonders that he could run a team where there was a language barrier how he did.
Mario to me actually has a lot of intangibles we need and is a wing. He reminds me of parsons and Hayward as his floor and ceiling. He can do a little of everything, shoot off the dribble, has size, gets to his spots, draws contact, and is a guy with balls. He gets in guys faces, and he has some nasty to him. I value his style and what he would bring as a starting 3 and point forward for us, a two way wing.
So that leaves me Winslow who is see as a floor of Metta (not artest) and a ceiling of Leonard. He has great d capabilities but he lacks a shot and if he develops it i see a guy like Leonard. If he doesn't I can see a guy who shoots some corner 3s while left open and bullies guys like Metta in la. If he doesn't meet either of those I see simple hype ala batum who doesn't actuallt stop anyone but can get stats across the board.
I watch them all but I'm not going to call this a franchise changing draft just like I said about last years. They are all just peices and the perimeter ones are better suited to help sooner