ImageImageImageImageImage

Bynum Extension Coming Up.. Max Money?

Moderators: TyCobb, Danny Darko, Kilroy

dingclancy
Analyst
Posts: 3,335
And1: 90
Joined: Feb 28, 2004
Contact:

Bynum Extension Coming Up.. Max Money? 

Post#1 » by dingclancy » Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:15 pm

QUOTABLE

Asked why he thought Bynum picked last offseason to get serious about the game, Lakers coach Phil Jackson noted Bynum can this offseason get a maximum-value contract extension worth about $75 million over five years:
Image
User avatar
RJM
General Manager
Posts: 9,609
And1: 2,266
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Location: Paris, France
Contact:
     

 

Post#2 » by RJM » Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:19 pm

This contract better have weight and production-related incentives. I'm not repeating the Shaq situation.
User avatar
Joe Kleazy
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,502
And1: 95
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Location: where theres NO B**CH-AZZNESS

 

Post#3 » by Joe Kleazy » Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:24 pm

Money makes the world go round. Like how phil threw out cash being bynums motivation to get him a bit more focused on proving himself.

Phil you sneaky Bas****
Image
Lakers8
Sophomore
Posts: 240
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 21, 2006
Location: Melbourne, Aus

 

Post#4 » by Lakers8 » Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:25 pm

Iceburg Slim wrote:This contract better have weight and production-related incentives. I'm not repeating the Shaq situation.


Agreed, i dont know if he is worth max yet, maybe some kind of contract where the value gets higher each year and its based on performance.
Sedale Threatt
RealGM
Posts: 49,016
And1: 40,970
Joined: Feb 06, 2007
Location: Clearing space in the trophy case.

 

Post#5 » by Sedale Threatt » Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:44 pm

He's probably worth between 10 and 12 million per at this stage. But I'm not too worried about it. I have a hard time seeing the Lakers letting him walk.
davidse
Head Coach
Posts: 6,375
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 05, 2004

 

Post#6 » by davidse » Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:11 pm

doesn't make sense - if the lakers give him the financial security 1 year in advance, he needs to give back - which means no max.

probably close to it
hopefully a lot of insentives as was mentioned

but maxing out a player 1 year before his contract is up (and he becomes a RESTRICTED free agent) ?

why ?
User avatar
BallAboveAll
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,307
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 02, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#7 » by BallAboveAll » Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:26 pm

I don't think weight will be an issue with Andrew. But I'm skeptical as to what kind of money he'll be getting.
User avatar
Air Bryant
Junior
Posts: 446
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 06, 2005
Location: Slovenia

 

Post#8 » by Air Bryant » Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:59 pm

Joe Kleazy wrote:Money makes the world go round. Like how phil threw out cash being bynums motivation to get him a bit more focused on proving himself.

Phil you sneaky Bas****



My thoughts exactly.
You can't stop, what you can't catch! KB24
Gerald3Wallace
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,794
And1: 99
Joined: Apr 12, 2007
Location: cali baby

 

Post#9 » by Gerald3Wallace » Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:08 pm

like i said before,

bynum should not be getting any more than al jefferson
User avatar
TommyTheCat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,311
And1: 8
Joined: Jun 07, 2005
Location: oregon

 

Post#10 » by TommyTheCat » Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:40 pm

Gerald3Wallace wrote:like i said before,

bynum should not be getting any more than al jefferson


bynum will own jefferson next year

Joe Kleazy wrote:Money makes the world go round. Like how phil threw out cash being bynums motivation to get him a bit more focused on proving himself.

Phil you sneaky Bas****


no doubt
User avatar
Dexmor
Head Coach
Posts: 7,002
And1: 39
Joined: Jan 26, 2007

 

Post#11 » by Dexmor » Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:47 pm

Do you guys think what Phil said is true?
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 93,302
And1: 24,565
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

 

Post#12 » by hermes » Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:20 pm

i don't think bynum should get max money
a deal mentioned above with incentives and increases every year sounds good, i don't have any idea what a dollar figure should be

we're in good hands with mitch :wink:
User avatar
Teen Girl Squad
Head Coach
Posts: 6,898
And1: 2,992
Joined: Jul 29, 2005
Location: Southern California
       

 

Post#13 » by Teen Girl Squad » Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:20 pm

star24 wrote:Do you guys think what Phil said is true?


Phil has also stated that was out of shape (proved that wrong), outmuscled (true to an extent but impoving) and now money hungry. Of course he wants the big payday, any half motivated player does. Our hope is that he signs an Al Jefferson type deal for all the help we've given him.
Image
User avatar
Joe Kleazy
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,502
And1: 95
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Location: where theres NO B**CH-AZZNESS

 

Post#14 » by Joe Kleazy » Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:32 pm

This is no doubt all mind tricks. Bynum has shown he is a type of player that loves a challenge and is not a guy that breaks down when somone says somthing negative about him. This may be one of his better qualities as a young player which will help his career greatly.


If anyone can benefit from a goal oriented contract at a decent payday to start with, it is AB17. Afterall he set a goal to be a allstar center and that gives the lakers a measuring point financially as long as they show him that is what they believe him to be capable of which lessens things from looking like a lowball offer.
Image
RatherUnique24
Senior
Posts: 733
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 26, 2007
Location: Brooklyn, New York

 

Post#15 » by RatherUnique24 » Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:09 pm

They dont pay him max money, he will find it somewhere else - good big man its extremely rare.
Gerald3Wallace
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,794
And1: 99
Joined: Apr 12, 2007
Location: cali baby

 

Post#16 » by Gerald3Wallace » Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:14 pm

bynum will own jefferson next year


the only reason why im saying bynum shouldnt get more is because, even though jeferson put up great stats he still came out and said, "im not worth max contract"...Bynums been doing good, but i stil dont think he deserves MAX money just yet
LLcoleJ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,393
And1: 3,366
Joined: Jan 20, 2005
Location: El Segundo
Contact:
       

 

Post#17 » by LLcoleJ » Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:18 pm

Bynum should sign a deal similar to what Al Jefferson did. If he plans it correctly he can take advantage of he new CBA that will be in 2010/11.
Cheers. :beer: — Mags
-G-
Analyst
Posts: 3,595
And1: 2,122
Joined: Jan 30, 2007

 

Post#18 » by -G- » Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:34 pm

Gerald3Wallace wrote:
bynum will own jefferson next year


the only reason why im saying bynum shouldnt get more is because, even though jeferson put up great stats he still came out and said, "im not worth max contract"...Bynums been doing good, but i stil dont think he deserves MAX money just yet


Of course he doesn't, but he's gonna get paid on potential. Kwame's making 9 mill this year, you think he deserved that? Depending on the beginning of next season, I still think he's gonna get at least 5 year 60 mill. He knows how much LA has invested in him.
LakerFanSince84
Junior
Posts: 311
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 06, 2007
Location: Seattle WA/Carson CA

 

Post#19 » by LakerFanSince84 » Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:46 pm

He can't get the max just yet, I'd give him a contract between Kaman and Jefferson. We still have Kobe, Odom, and Ariza contracts to deal with in the near future. I know people want Odom gone, but his versatility is something so rare and will be difficult to replace. U have to assume he'll still be there, but Odom wants to finish his career as a Laker, so I don't think Money will be such a issue with Odom. Kobe will DEMAND the MAX, because he's KOBE. But With Bynum's play now, one would have to assume that he is the TOP PRIORITY in the Laker Organization. If Bynum and Kobe really want to win, then they will work for what's best for ALL parties.
User avatar
Tommy Trojan
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,447
And1: 36
Joined: Aug 19, 2006
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#20 » by Tommy Trojan » Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:58 pm

Lakers8 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Iceburg Slim wrote:This contract better have weight and production-related incentives. I'm not repeating the Shaq situation.


Agreed, i dont know if he is worth max yet, maybe some kind of contract where the value gets higher each year and its based on performance.



I agree with both og you.

But, Bynum is still young and humble so I don't think he will be another Shaq.

Return to Los Angeles Lakers