Vujacic: Dead Man Walking?
Moderators: TyCobb, Danny Darko, Kilroy
Vujacic: Dead Man Walking?
-
semi-sentient
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 20,149
- And1: 5,609
- Joined: Feb 23, 2005
- Location: Austin, Tejas
-
Vujacic: Dead Man Walking?
[url=http://www.cnbc.com/id/24892642]Laker Vujacic
"Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere." - Carl Sagan
-
cavsfan_osiris
- Starter
- Posts: 2,173
- And1: 4
- Joined: Oct 28, 2007
-
DEEP3CL
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,899
- And1: 3,207
- Joined: Jul 23, 2005
- Location: LOS ANGELES,CA.
-
I hate betters of basketball anyway it's good they lost their f**king money, basketball is too unpredictable to bet on anyway.
VETERAN LAKERS FAN
SmartWentCrazy wrote:It's extremely unlikely that they end up in the top 3.They're probably better off trying to win and giving Philly the 8th pick than tanking and giving them the 4th.
-
tkb
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 10,759
- And1: 198
- Joined: Mar 19, 2005
- Location: Norway
-
I was on such a hot streak in the conference finals when it came to betting. Only bet I missed was that I bet that Kobe would score over 30 in game 4 against the Spurs (ended up with 28).
Anyway, I had the 8 point spread on this game, so at least Sasha didn't cost me my stake. I did lose the profit on that bet with that shot though.
Anyway, I had the 8 point spread on this game, so at least Sasha didn't cost me my stake. I did lose the profit on that bet with that shot though.
-
The Laker Kid
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,152
- And1: 6,500
- Joined: Dec 16, 2006
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
-
LA-LA-Land
- Junior
- Posts: 464
- And1: 0
- Joined: Aug 04, 2005
JustBlaze20 wrote:I'm kind of confused about sports betting, but just as his shot cost people money who bet on the Spurs covering the spread, doesn't it make people money who bet that they wouldn't???
ah but the article said that from data he has, 66% voted the spurs would cover. so yeah the 34% made their money, but that's a lot of losers.
-
atang00
- Banned User
- Posts: 943
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Theres nothing wrong with betting you losers.
Some people who actually can manage their money can actually make a living off it.
But yes, there are a lot of suckers too. Sort of like why play poker for money? Why go gamble cash at the casinos? Why do a friendly bet on the superbowl?
BETTING IS MORE COMMON THAN YOU THINK AHOLES...don't bash it just because you don't do it.
Heck, look at this forum. Its sponsored by a BETTING SPORTSBOOK.
Some people who actually can manage their money can actually make a living off it.
But yes, there are a lot of suckers too. Sort of like why play poker for money? Why go gamble cash at the casinos? Why do a friendly bet on the superbowl?
BETTING IS MORE COMMON THAN YOU THINK AHOLES...don't bash it just because you don't do it.
Heck, look at this forum. Its sponsored by a BETTING SPORTSBOOK.
-
LLcoleJ
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 24,393
- And1: 3,366
- Joined: Jan 20, 2005
- Location: El Segundo
- Contact:
-
atang00 wrote:Theres nothing wrong with betting you losers.
Some people who actually can manage their money can actually make a living off it.
But yes, there are a lot of suckers too. Sort of like why play poker for money? Why go gamble cash at the casinos? Why do a friendly bet on the superbowl?
BETTING IS MORE COMMON THAN YOU THINK AHOLES...don't bash it just because you don't do it.
Heck, look at this forum. Its sponsored by a BETTING SPORTSBOOK.
Warning for trolling and insults.
Cheers. 
— Mags
— Mags
-
CourtsideTV
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,755
- And1: 349
- Joined: Apr 12, 2004
- Location: L-I-M-R
-
