I_Socrates wrote:K_chile22 wrote:I_Socrates wrote:It'll be above what Houston offered, but front loaded so the Nets can pay the bulk of the salary off this season.
That's the smart move here, IMO. Use Morey's tactics against him to make it like a $20M cap hit this season so Houston won't dare match because they'll be in the luxury tax.
Well there are limits to how much a contract can change year to year, I believe it's 7.5% (right cap guys?), if you are referring to the unbalanced contract given out to Lin and Asik, I believe that was because of the Arenas provision, the first two years of someone in that situation (like Tyler Johnson) are restricted to the MLE and any year after that cango up to the max. You can't just be like "here's 30 million but you get 20 up front then 5 and 5" that's illegal under the CBA. I'm pretty sure, hopefully I'm not wrong and look stupid
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using RealGM mobile app
So let's assume what the Rockets offered him was $10M per for 3 years. If the Nets want to beat that and say offer 12.5 per for 4, that's 4 years, $50M. They can structure the deal to be where the cap hit is $20M the first season and then $10M per season after that for the Rockets, but remains at $12.5M per for the Nets while payments also remain at $12.5 (or whatever increasing structure they choose between $10-14M).
Perfectly legal under the CBA and perfectly applicable to this scenario because Motiejunas is an RFA.
I think the exact amount they'd have to offer for the first year is ~$18M which puts Houston just over the luxury tax making it a guarantee that they don't match. Of course they could always match and cut someone, but it's safe to say Houston doesn't like him enough or they'd have re-signed him already.
Well a 4 year contract is just not a good idea so they shouldn't match anyways
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using RealGM mobile app