yardbarker

Cousins to OKC?

Moderators: loserX, HartfordWhalers, moocow007, VintaGe36, Trader_Joe, jazzfan1971

Cousins to OKC?

Postby j_angel on Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:24 pm

OKC receive: Cousins, Garcia, Brooks.
OKC trade: Perkins, Lamb, PJIII, Tor 1st, Dal 1st.

SAC receive: Perkins, Lamb, PJIII, Tor 1st, Dal 1st.
SAC trade: Cousins, Garcia, Brooks.


Why for OKC?
They get a quality bigman who can score. He has 2 years left of his rookie deal. Yes he will get paid at the end of this but I think OKC would pay him, giving max to center with the potential to be top 3 at his position is better than paying a guy who was your 6th man (Harden).
Lamb & PJIII are not helping now, DMC would.
They also get rid of Perkins for a backup SF and a PG to backup Westbrook and provide some instant offense.

Westbrook - Maynor - Brooks.
Sefolosha - Martin
Durant - Garcia
Ibaka
Cousins - Collison - Thabeet

Much improved starting 5 with a decent bench (Maynor, Brooks, Martin, Garcia, Collison make a strong 10 man playoff rotation).

Why for SAC?
Plain and simple they are not a good team. There's only so far a guy like DMC can lead a team. He needs to be the 2nd guy in order to mature and grow.
Yes Lamb is not in a position of need but they can start him and chose to move Evans or let him expire and save money. They rebuild completely with picks and a plethora of young players.
They do not really need Brooks or Garcia so moving them does not make them a lot worse.

Thomas - Fredette
Lamb - Evans - Thornton
Johnson - Salmons
Thompson - Robinson - PJIII
Perkins - Hayes

thoughts? adjustments you would make?
j_angel
Sixth Man
 
Posts: 1698
And1: 22
Joined: Jul 9, 2012
Location: England

Re: Cousins to OKC?

Postby lakerhater on Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:43 pm

Sac would be better off dealing Evans, keeping Cousins and replacing Smart with a coach that can better utilize Cousins.
lakerhater
Analyst
 
Posts: 3583
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 3, 2002

Re: Cousins to OKC?

Postby theatlfan on Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:10 pm

j_angel wrote:Why for OKC?
They get a quality bigman who can score. He has 2 years left of his rookie deal. Yes he will get paid at the end of this but I think OKC would pay him, giving max to center with the potential to be top 3 at his position is better than paying a guy who was your 6th man (Harden).
Lamb & PJIII are not helping now, DMC would.
They also get rid of Perkins for a backup SF and a PG to backup Westbrook and provide some instant offense.

Seen this a few times and still trying to figure this out - why does OKC need a backup PG? Is Maynor not any good? I've always thought he was a decent player who's on of the better backup PGs in the league and seems to have recovered from his injury. Am I missing something that everyone else sees?

BTW, this shouldn't affect the trade at all. Brooks can be removed without salary ramifications - the deal is for Cousins, not Brooks.
Image
User avatar
theatlfan
Sixth Man
 
Posts: 1606
And1: 4
Joined: Dec 22, 2008
Location: Where I at

Re: Cousins to OKC?

Postby j_angel on Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:18 pm

Good question.

I included Brooks for a few reasons.
1) Maynor has just come back from a serious injury
2) They should play Westbrook at SG for a portion of the game, especially against slower SG's.
3) Maynor is expiring this year, can they afford to pay him what he will want? If not Brooks is a cheap alternative.
4) I dont think sac need him (their other two PGs are so similar to him), so they save a little bit which they may want to since they are taking on perkins.

But yes the main deal is
PJIII/Lamb/picks for DMC.
with a Perkins for Garcia swap to sweeten the deal for OKC (and save them a couple of mil a year) and give them a player in a position of need.

Brooks could be taken out if needed though.
j_angel
Sixth Man
 
Posts: 1698
And1: 22
Joined: Jul 9, 2012
Location: England

Re: Cousins to OKC?

Postby vege on Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:57 pm

You do not rebuilding giving up a talented young Center for minor pieces.
User avatar
vege
RealGM
 
Posts: 11078
And1: 16
Joined: Jul 18, 2008
Location: Somewhere celebrating Drummond's Pick!!!!!!!

Re: Cousins to OKC?

Postby j_angel on Sun Nov 18, 2012 4:49 pm

Personally would not call a guaranteed lotto pick (likely high), a late 1st and two very good prospects minor pieces. Its more than Orlando got for Dwight and similar to what they got for Harden (PJIII as opposed to Martin).
j_angel
Sixth Man
 
Posts: 1698
And1: 22
Joined: Jul 9, 2012
Location: England

Re: Cousins to OKC?

Postby I_Socrates on Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:26 pm

j_angel wrote:Personally would not call a guaranteed lotto pick (likely high), a late 1st and two very good prospects minor pieces. Its more than Orlando got for Dwight and similar to what they got for Harden (PJIII as opposed to Martin).


Dwight wanted out and Orlando had no leverage. Cousins is happy (or so we're told) and Kings have ALL the leverage. Orlando didn't have to take on Perkins, instead they got to dump Duhon. This is horrendous for the Kings any way you try to put it. For it to even be considerable, Ibaka needs to be subbed in Perkins' place.
Image
User avatar
I_Socrates
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 5241
And1: 21
Joined: Jun 16, 2008

Re: Cousins to OKC?

Postby slick_watts on Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:50 pm

I don't want OKC to have to be the team to rehabilitate Cousins into a legitimate player. The guy has been able to do whatever he wants, shoot as often as he wants, and is not effective on the court.

http://bkref.com/tiny/w0gtr

Of three year high usage players, Cousins has the third worst TS% ever for a F or C behind Marcus Fizer and Antoine Walker.

There's a place out there for Cousins to learn how to play but it's not a team like OKC that wants to win now.
slick_watts
Forum Mod
 
Posts: 8489
And1: 12
Joined: Jan 3, 2005
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: Cousins to OKC?

Postby longfellow44 on Sun Nov 18, 2012 6:36 pm

OKC doesn't have the ability to obtain Cousins without sending out durant or westbrook plain and simple.
User avatar
longfellow44
Lead Assistant
 
Posts: 5311
And1: 3
Joined: May 3, 2007
Location: Washinton DC

Re: Cousins to OKC?

Postby Wasabi_Johnson on Sun Nov 18, 2012 6:58 pm

I wouldn't trade all that for Cousins. He's a very inefficient center. You can only be young and with potential for so long before its time to start showing something on the court.
Wasabi_Johnson
Rookie
 
Posts: 1235
And1: 12
Joined: Jan 7, 2012

Re: Cousins to OKC?

Postby Biz Gilwalker on Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:16 pm

Cousins/Ibaka/Durant/Sefolosha/Westbrook + Collison/Martin/Maynor/Brooks would just be downright scary. Dream scenario for OKC.

Don't know what Sacramento is supposed to do with Tyreke, Thornton, Lamb, Thomas, and Jimmer, essentially all combo guards, not mention value is off for them.
Image
Blkbrd671 wrote:horrible trade for NY. If Amare's going out, MKG should be coming back
RealGM, where trading the worst contract in the league for a #2 pick happens.
User avatar
Biz Gilwalker
General Manager
 
Posts: 9061
And1: 136
Joined: Feb 5, 2012
Location: A place where we shock the world with a two game winning streak and then mope when it's gone

Re: Cousins to OKC?

Postby LoyalKing on Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:12 pm

That makes zero sense for SAC

Yeah, SAC sucks and Cousins needs to mature. We all know that. But SAC won't trade him for minor pieces. SAC doesn't need another guard, SAC doesn't need another PF, the Dallas pick is heavy protected, Perkins sucks just like his contract and the only valuable piece here is the TOR pick.

It's an easy no from Sacramento.
User avatar
LoyalKing
Rookie
 
Posts: 1158
And1: 3
Joined: May 5, 2011

Re: Cousins to OKC?

Postby SuperflyKnick on Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:08 pm

Wasabi_Johnson wrote:I wouldn't trade all that for Cousins. He's a very inefficient center. You can only be young and with potential for so long before its time to start showing something on the court.



reallly dude lolzzzz cousins is far and away the best player in this deal....In case u havent noticed that package wont even sniff getting cousins
User avatar
SuperflyKnick
Veteran
 
Posts: 2974
And1: 12
Joined: Feb 23, 2003

Re: Cousins to OKC?

Postby mattg on Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:37 pm

this isn't even close to being enough to get cousins.
User avatar
mattg
Veteran
 
Posts: 2987
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 12, 2007

Re: Cousins to OKC?

Postby oyoyer on Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:18 am

Wait... Is there really people talking about VALUE in a Derrick Coleman, er, DeMarcus Cousins trade thread? Really???DC2 is a straight up nutjob and SAC has no shot of getting full value for him. This would actually be a great trade for them if OKC went for it. However, OKC is trying to win chips and head cases tend to derail chip aspirations. So it's a no go for them.
Speaking of Rip Hamilton...
Collymore wrote:He's a perfect match. He can teach the Cavs young core everything about locker room riots, how to get your own, and nice stuff like that.
oyoyer
Rookie
 
Posts: 1151
And1: 5
Joined: May 1, 2010

Next

Return to Trades and Transactions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Colbinii, Devilanche, Foshan, lakerhater, pennyspree, witnessraps, WizardsWorld