LAL - BOS

Moderators: loserX, Trader_Joe, bondom34, jazzfan1971, HartfordWhalers, Chuck Texas, Smitty731, moocow007

User avatar
Kobe System
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,438
And1: 142
Joined: Mar 31, 2010
 

LAL - BOS 

Post#1 » by Kobe System » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:40 am

LAL trade: Hill/Blake/Ebanks
BOS trade: Lee/Bradley

Why for Lakers: They get a back court duo who can play defense
Why for Celtics: They get their big man.

Lakers:
Nash/Bradley/Morris
Bryant/Lee/Meeks
MWP/Clark
Pau/Jamison
Howard/Sacre

Boston:
Rondo/Blake
Barbosa/Terry
Pierce/Green/Ebanks
Garnett/Bass
Hill/Sullinger/Melo
HartfordWhalers
Forum Mod - 76ers
Forum Mod - 76ers
Posts: 19,786
And1: 3,103
Joined: Apr 07, 2010

Re: LAL - BOS 

Post#2 » by HartfordWhalers » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:47 am

Looks pretty bad for Boston to me.
loserX
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 29,795
And1: 4,302
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

Re: LAL - BOS 

Post#3 » by loserX » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:48 am

No way Boston does that. I think they value Lee and Bradley each more than Hill and the rest of that package is not positive value.
Cashin out
Banned User
Posts: 1,456
And1: 12
Joined: Nov 12, 2012

Re: LAL - BOS 

Post#4 » by Cashin out » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:52 am

Boston is pretty high on Bradley they need him against Miami vs Dwade.

Hill for Lee is a fair deal though.
Kupchak9
Analyst
Posts: 3,405
And1: 827
Joined: Jan 21, 2012

Re: LAL - BOS 

Post#5 » by Kupchak9 » Sat Dec 15, 2012 7:24 am

Thats awful for Boston
Image
User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 19,117
And1: 2,288
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Re: LAL - BOS 

Post#6 » by Dr Aki » Sat Dec 15, 2012 3:52 pm

lakers wonders what danny ainge is smoking and sends some more to the 28 other franchises
Image
User avatar
mcfly1204
Head Coach
Posts: 7,479
And1: 934
Joined: Oct 31, 2008

Re: LAL - BOS 

Post#7 » by mcfly1204 » Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:14 pm

Celtics Lakers trade while neither is rebuilding? History says that is unlikely.
Well at least we're not Detroit!

Return to Trades and Transactions