yardbarker

utah, mil, and lal

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, Trader_Joe, jazzfan1971, loserX, moocow007, Chuck Texas

Post#1 utah, mil, and lal
Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:50 am by shagadelic45

utah trades: marvin williams, paul milsap, raja bell

utah receives: monta ellis, beno udrih, drew gooden

jazz get the sg perimeter scorer they covet and dump williams and bell, but take on gooden in the process




mil trades: monta ellis, beno udrih, drew gooden, samuel dalembert


mil receives: pau gasol, steve blake, chris duhon, jorda hill

bucks lose ellis but dump gooden's deal in the process and get their man in gasol



lal trade: pau gasol, steve blake, chris duhon, jorda hill

lal receives: marvin williams, paul milsap, raja bell, samuel dalembert

lakers lose gasol but get some better depth and fits
shagadelic45
Head Coach
Posts: 7,299
And1: 3
Joined: Nov 19, 2001
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Top

Post#2 Re: utah, mil, and lal
Thu Jan 17, 2013 8:54 am by Chuck Texas

So LAL turns Gasol, an injured guy and two overpaid 3rd string pgs into 4 useful rotation pieces and only are responsible for the last year of Marvin's deal. They get better players and better contracts?

Utah takes on Gooden to turn Milsap into Ellis. That is never ever happening.
jayjaysee wrote:I'm all for KD never leaving OKC, but when people say "keep cap space for 2016" they are really just saying "hey KD could think we are pretty"
Chuck Texas





Forum Mod - Mavericks
Forum Mod - Mavericks
User avatar
Posts: 14,439
And1: 3,688
Joined: May 19, 2012
Top

Post#3 Re: utah, mil, and lal
Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:29 am by shagadelic45

gasol, is , the best player in the deal
shagadelic45
Head Coach
Posts: 7,299
And1: 3
Joined: Nov 19, 2001
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Top

Post#4 Re: utah, mil, and lal
Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:37 am by Chuck Texas

shagadelic45 wrote:gasol, is , the best player in the deal


I think I agree with that but understand Im still a Pau believer. But hes not that much better than Milsap how hes playing right now and hes certainly not a more valuable trade piece than Milsap right now. But fine just for argument's sake lets say Gasol is back to putting up 17/11/3 and moving well from today until the deadline. Now trading him straight up for Milsap seems more reasonable. But then you are turning an injured Hill and 2 worthless pgs into Marvin Williams, Daly, and Raja. Can you not see how unlikely that is? Plus why in the world would Utah take on Gooden? They arent gettng "the best player in the deal". They are getting Monta Ellis.

I know you are a Lakers fan looking to make deals to benefit your team. Thats great. I do the same thing for Dallas. But you have to actually consider how these deals help the other team(s) and you have to do it as objectively as possible. I know you cant look at this deal and think Utah would touch it. Its impossible.
jayjaysee wrote:I'm all for KD never leaving OKC, but when people say "keep cap space for 2016" they are really just saying "hey KD could think we are pretty"
Chuck Texas





Forum Mod - Mavericks
Forum Mod - Mavericks
User avatar
Posts: 14,439
And1: 3,688
Joined: May 19, 2012
Top

Post#5 Re: utah, mil, and lal
Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:03 pm by Underkanter

Texas Chuck wrote:
shagadelic45 wrote:gasol, is , the best player in the deal


I think I agree with that but understand Im still a Pau believer. But hes not that much better than Milsap how hes playing right now and hes certainly not a more valuable trade piece than Milsap right now. But fine just for argument's sake lets say Gasol is back to putting up 17/11/3 and moving well from today until the deadline. Now trading him straight up for Milsap seems more reasonable. But then you are turning an injured Hill and 2 worthless pgs into Marvin Williams, Daly, and Raja. Can you not see how unlikely that is? Plus why in the world would Utah take on Gooden? They arent gettng "the best player in the deal". They are getting Monta Ellis.

I know you are a Lakers fan looking to make deals to benefit your team. Thats great. I do the same thing for Dallas. But you have to actually consider how these deals help the other team(s) and you have to do it as objectively as possible. I know you cant look at this deal and think Utah would touch it. Its impossible.


Yeah Pau had value 5 years ago. Why are LAL fans always so ignorant on trades??
Underkanter
Starter
Posts: 2,104
And1: 160
Joined: Jan 18, 2013
Top

Post#6 Re: utah, mil, and lal
Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:20 pm by RandyBreuer

shagadelic45 wrote:gasol, is , the best player in the deal


:lol: :lol: :lol:
Mail it in for Mudiay
Play like clowns for Towns
Be a joke for Okafor

Drugbust wrote
"Sorry if my opinion offended your delicate sensibilities"
RandyBreuer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,274
And1: 59
Joined: Jun 25, 2012
Location: Phoenix, hitting cold margaritas and hot senoritas
Top

Post#7 Re: utah, mil, and lal
Fri Jan 18, 2013 3:26 pm by StocktonShorts

:lol:

This is horrible for Utah.
Image
StocktonShorts



Forum Mod - Jazz
Forum Mod - Jazz
User avatar
Posts: 11,245
And1: 1,342
Joined: Jun 2, 2009
Top

Post#8 Re: utah, mil, and lal
Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:16 pm by sendai91

I'll make this really simple why Utah is rejecting this trade.

Millsap's output and expiring salary are 100x more appealing than Gooden's output and nasty contract.

Utah would much rather have Marvin Williams ( even at his moderate / slightly underwhelming level of output) than Monta Ellis's drunk duck-hunter approach to shot selection and consistency, and I guess for that matter Ellis's overall bad fit in Utah's system in several ways.

And while Beno is definitely an more attractive piece than Bell is, there's no point in accepting the negative value of Monta / Gooden when the Jazz could just sign Udrih in the offseason if they wanted..
sendai91
Rookie
Posts: 1,223
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 2, 2006
Top

Post#9 Re: utah, mil, and lal
Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:50 pm by grizzlies50

Too good for LAL
Too bad for Utah

Pau value is as same as Bargnani or little better. do you understand this mean?
grizzlies50
Sophomore
Posts: 120
And1: 5
Joined: Dec 31, 2012
Top

Post#10 Re: utah, mil, and lal
Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:13 pm by JayMKE

Bucks would rather have Paul Milsap, we'd cut LA out.
FREE GIANNIS
JayMKE



RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 12,278
And1: 1,374
Joined: Jun 21, 2010
Location: AZ
Top


Return to Trades and Transactions


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: I_Socrates, moss_is_1, neno, teerfour+40LG, warren weel im, Wasabi_Johnson, winter_mute_13, youngthegiant